EUV Resist Materials Design for 15 nm Half Pitch and Below

Chemically amplified resist materials with a different sensitivity were prepared to investigate impact of sensitivity on resolution at 15 nm half-pitch (hp) using a EUV microfield exposure tool (MET) at SEMATECH Berkeley. Sensitivity at least slower than 30 mJ/cm was required to resolve 15 nm hp patterns using current EUV resists. It is noteworthy that resolution of 15 nm hp was limited by not only pattern collapse but also pinching of patterns. The same tendency is observed in E-beam patterning at 20 nm hp. A strong relationship between pinching and sensitivity in E-beam exposure indicates contribution of photon-shot noise on the pinching. Clear correlation between diffusion length and pinching using the E-beam exposure indicates that acid diffusion is another contributor on the pinching. Bound PAG into polymer and molecular PAG with a big anchor group showed almost same character on pinching. Key conclusion here is even in a molecular PAG, we can control acid diffusion to achieve 15 nm hp resolution capability. Strategy to improve sensitivity is to utilize resist with high deprotection efficiency. Polymer with a low thermal activation energy on deprotection (low Ea polymer) was demonstrated as a key technology to achieve 15 nm hp resolution with a faster sensitivity below 26 mJ/cm. Special rinse material was effective for reducing LWR by ~ 20%. Sensitivity dependency of outgassing have been systematically discussed at first. A good linear correlation between a cleanable outgassing amount and exposure energy strongly indicates tradeoff relationship between outgassing and sensitivity. Applying a new EUV topcoat to resist demonstrated reduction of outgassing from 7.39 nm to below 0.1 nm with maintaining resolution.

[1]  Daiju Shiono,et al.  Characteristics of low Ea 193-nm chemical amplification resists , 2006, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[2]  Kim Dean,et al.  Effects of material design on extreme ultraviolet (EUV) resist outgassing , 2006, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[3]  David Van Steenwinckel,et al.  Lithographic importance of acid diffusion in chemically amplified resists , 2005, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[4]  Hideaki Tsubaki,et al.  Study on approaches for improvement of EUV-resist sensitivity , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[5]  Ivan Pollentier,et al.  Assessment of resist outgassing related EUV optics contamination for CAR and non-CAR material chemistries , 2011, Advanced Lithography.

[6]  Hideaki Tsubaki,et al.  EUV Resist Materials for 16 nm And below Half Pitch Applications , 2012 .

[7]  Kenneth A. Goldberg,et al.  Critical challenges for EUV resist materials , 2011, Advanced Lithography.

[8]  Yayi Wei,et al.  Evaluation of EUV resist materials for use at the 32 nm half-pitch node , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[9]  Anne-Marie Goethals,et al.  Unraveling the effect of resist composition on EUV optics contamination , 2011, Advanced Lithography.

[10]  Nobuji Matsumura,et al.  Performance comparison of chemically amplified resists under EUV, EB, and KrF exposure , 2006, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[11]  G. Odian,et al.  Principles of polymerization , 1981 .

[12]  Hideaki Tsubaki,et al.  Characterizing polymer bound PAG-type EUV resist , 2011, Advanced Lithography.

[13]  Takahiro Kozawa,et al.  Radiation and photochemistry of onium salt acid generators in chemically amplified resists , 2000, Advanced Lithography.

[14]  Hideaki Tsubaki,et al.  Resolution and LWR improvements by acid diffusion control in EUV lithography , 2009, Advanced Lithography.

[15]  Nigel P. Hacker,et al.  Photochemistry of triarylsulfonium salts , 1990 .

[16]  Hiroshi Ito Chemical amplification resists for microlithography , 2005 .

[17]  Yasumasa Kawabe,et al.  The material design to reduce outgassing in acetal-based chemically amplified resist for EUV lithography , 2006, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[18]  Scott A. MacDonald,et al.  Airborne chemical contamination of a chemically amplified resist , 1991, Other Conferences.

[19]  Kenneth A. Goldberg,et al.  The SEMATECH Berkeley MET pushing EUV development beyond 22nm half pitch , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[20]  Hideaki Tsubaki,et al.  A study on the material design for the reduction of LWR , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[21]  Yasin Ekinci,et al.  Measuring resist-induced contrast loss using EUV interference lithography , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[22]  T. Wallow,et al.  EUV resist performance: current assessment for sub-22-nm half-pitch patterning on NXE:3300 , 2012, Advanced Lithography.

[23]  Remco Jager,et al.  Optimum dose for shot noise limited CD uniformity in electron-beam lithography , 2004 .

[24]  Hiroki Yamamoto,et al.  Dependence of acid generation efficiency on the protection ratio of hydroxyl groups in chemically amplified electron beam, x-ray and EUV resists , 2004 .

[25]  Nigel P. Hacker,et al.  Photochemistry of Triarylsulfonium Salts. , 1990 .