A sequential mixed model research design: Design, analytical and display issues

Abstract A new era in research methods is emerging and has been quietly lauded by several emerging authorities in the field of mixed methods research. Like the mythology of the phoenix, mixed methods research has arisen out of the ashes of the paradigm wars to become the third methodological movement (Cameron & Miller 2007). The fields of applied social science and evaluation are among those which have shown the greatest popularity and uptake of mixed methods research designs. This article provides a brief overview of the rise of mixed methods research, its usage in business and management fields and its relationship to the philosophy of pragmatism. Typologies of mixed methods research designs are discussed and a case study of a sequential mixed model research design in the human resource development (HRD) field is presented. Issues related to design, analytical processes and display arising from utilising this particular mixed method research design are discussed. As a consequence, the article contains several Tables and Figures which exemplify display options that may assist those researchers who are considering utilising a mixed method research design.

[1]  D L Morgan,et al.  Practical Strategies for Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Applications to Health Research , 1998, Qualitative health research.

[2]  N. Nummela,et al.  Mixed methods in international business research: A value-added perspective , 2006 .

[3]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1997 .

[4]  Jennifer Caroline Greene,et al.  Crafting mixed‐method evaluation designs , 1997 .

[5]  John Mingers,et al.  Multi-Paradigm Multimethodology , 1997 .

[6]  James A. Davis,et al.  Constructing social research , 1994 .

[7]  James H. McMillan,et al.  Research in Education: Evidence Based Inquiry , 2005 .

[8]  P. Miller,et al.  Mixed method research: phoenix of the paradigm wars , 2007 .

[9]  John Mingers,et al.  The paucity of multimethod research: a review of the information systems literature , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[10]  George R. Franke,et al.  HANDBOOK OF MIXED METHODS IN SOCIAL & BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (Book) , 2004 .

[11]  Benoît Rihoux,et al.  Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis , 2006 .

[12]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  What Is a Case?: Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry , 1992 .

[13]  E. Guba,et al.  Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences. , 2005 .

[14]  John Gerring.  Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards . Edited by Henry Brady and David Collier. (Rowman and Littlefield, 2004.) , 2008 .

[15]  Mark A. Earley.  Developing a Syllabus for a Mixed‐Methods Research Course , 2007 .

[16]  D. Mertens.  Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods , 1997 .

[17]  I. Holloway,et al.  Mixed Methods Research , 2010 .

[18]  E. Guba,et al.  The Paradigm dialog , 1990 .

[19]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Constructing social research :the unity and diversity of method , 1996 .

[20]  W. Neuman,et al.  Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 2002 .

[21]  David Collier,et al.  Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards , 2004 .

[22]  Benoît Rihoux,et al.  Innovative Comparative Methods for policy Analysis. Beyond the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide , 2006 .

[23]  Thomas S. Eberle,et al.  A Cartography of Qualitative Research in Switzerland , 2005 .

[24]  John W. Creswell,et al.  The mixed methods reader , 2008 .

[25]  Pat Bazeley,et al.  Teaching Mixed Methods , 2006 .

[26]  A. Bryman,et al.  Contextualizing Methods Choice in Organizational Research , 2007 .

[27]  R. Murray Thomas,et al.  Blending qualitative & quantitative research methods in theses and dissertations , 2003 .

[28]  Jennifer Caroline Greene,et al.  Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry , 2007 .

[29]  Valerie J. Caracelli,et al.  Advances in mixed-method evaluation : the challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms , 1997 .

[30]  K. Perreault,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2011 .

[31]  J. Creswell,et al.  Mixed Methods Research Designs in Counseling Psychology. , 2005 .

[32]  B. Rihoux.  Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Systematic Comparative Methods , 2006 .

[33]  Kurt Weyland,et al.  Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards , 2005, Perspectives on Politics.

[34]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[35]  Peta. Heywood.  Blending Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods in Theses and Dissertations [Book Review] , 2005 .

[36]  Manfred Max Bergman,et al.  Advances in mixed methods research , 2008 .

[37]  A. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come , 2004 .

[38]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .