Automatic recording of individual oestrus vocalisation in group-housed dairy cattle: development of a cattle call monitor.

Oestrus detection remains a problem in the dairy cattle industry. Therefore, automatic detection systems have been developed to detect specific behavioural changes at oestrus. Vocal behaviour has not been considered in such automatic oestrus detection systems in cattle, though the vocalisation rate is known to increase during oestrus. The main challenge in using vocalisation to detect oestrus is correctly identifying the calling individual when animals are moving freely in large groups, as oestrus needs to be detected at an individual level. Therefore, we aimed to automate vocalisation recording and caller identification in group-housed dairy cows. This paper first presents the details of such a system and then presents the results of a pilot study validating its functionality, in which the automatic detection of calls from individual heifers was compared to video-based assessment of these calls by a trained human observer, a technique that has, until now, been considered the 'gold standard'. We developed a collar-based cattle call monitor (CCM) with structure-borne and airborne sound microphones and a recording unit and developed a postprocessing algorithm to identify the caller by matching the information from both microphones. Five group-housed heifers, each in the perioestrus or oestrus period, were equipped with a CCM prototype for 5 days. The recorded audio data were subsequently analysed and compared with audiovisual recordings. Overall, 1404 vocalisations from the focus heifers and 721 vocalisations from group mates were obtained. Vocalisations during collar changes or malfunctions of the CCM were omitted from the evaluation. The results showed that the CCM had a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 94%. The negative and positive predictive values were 80% and 96%, respectively. These results show that the detection of individual vocalisations and the correct identification of callers are possible, even in freely moving group-housed cattle. The results are promising for the future use of vocalisation in automatic oestrus detection systems.

[1]  C. Wrenzycki,et al.  Vocalization as an indicator of estrus climax in Holstein heifers during natural estrus and superovulation. , 2018, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  C J Rutten,et al.  Invited review: sensors to support health management on dairy farms. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  Lucas P. J. J. Noldus,et al.  Sound analysis in dairy cattle vocalisation as a potential welfare monitor , 2015, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[4]  Nitendra Rajput,et al.  Effective and accurate discrimination of individual dairy cattle through acoustic sensing , 2013 .

[5]  Lisette M. C. Leliveld,et al.  Vocal correlates of emotional reactivity within and across contexts in domestic pigs (Sus scrofa) , 2017, Physiology & Behavior.

[6]  G. Manteuffel,et al.  Differential vocal responses to physical and mental stressors in domestic pigs (Sus scrofa) , 2008 .

[7]  R. Seyfarth,et al.  Baboon loud calls advertise male quality: acoustic features and their relation to rank, age, and exhaustion , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[8]  P C Schön,et al.  Linear prediction coding analysis and self-organizing feature map as tools to classify stress calls of domestic pigs (Sus scrofa). , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  C. Clark,et al.  Invited review: The evolution of cattle bioacoustics and application for advanced dairy systems. , 2017, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[10]  Klaus Zuberbühler,et al.  A method for automated individual, species and call type recognition in free-ranging animals , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  Lisette M. C. Leliveld,et al.  Behavioural and physiological measures indicate subtle variations in the emotional valence of young pigs , 2016, Physiology & Behavior.

[12]  R L Nebel,et al.  Time of ovulation relative to mounting activity in dairy cattle. , 1996, Journal of dairy science.

[13]  T. Grandin.  Cattle vocalizations are associated with handling and equipment problems at beef slaughter plants. , 2001, Applied animal behaviour science.

[14]  M. Crowe,et al.  The relationship between activity clusters detected by an automatic activity monitor and endocrine changes during the periestrous period in lactating dairy cows. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  P C Schön,et al.  Altered vocalization rate during the estrous cycle in dairy cattle. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  Gerhard Manteuffel,et al.  Automated recording of stress vocalisations as a tool to document impaired welfare in pigs , 2004, Animal Welfare.

[17]  Lisa F. Gill,et al.  A minimum‐impact, flexible tool to study vocal communication of small animals with precise individual‐level resolution , 2016 .

[18]  M. Nielen,et al.  Relationship among estradiol, cortisol and intensity of estrous behavior in dairy cattle. , 2000, Theriogenology.

[19]  Jean-Marie Aerts,et al.  Cough localization for the detection of respiratory diseases in pig houses , 2008 .

[20]  E. Briefer,et al.  Fallow bucks attend to vocal cues of motivation and fatigue , 2014 .

[21]  Denis Réale,et al.  Spying on small wildlife sounds using affordable collar-mounted miniature microphones: an innovative method to record individual daylong vocalisations in chipmunks , 2015, Scientific reports.

[22]  S Reith,et al.  Review: Behavioral signs of estrus and the potential of fully automated systems for detection of estrus in dairy cattle. , 2017, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[23]  Gerhard Manteuffel,et al.  Castration-induced vocalisation in domestic piglets, Sus scrofa: Complex and specific alterations of the vocal quality , 2005 .