Identifying and rating cultural sustainability indicators: a case study of wood-based bioenergy systems in eastern Finland

Cultural sustainability has become a much discussed topic in the forestry and bioenergy sectors. However, there are not many indicators available for measuring cultural sustainability. In order to identify indicators for the assessment of the cultural sustainability impacts of wood-based bioenergy in eastern Finland, two-phased expert interviews were conducted. The process was supported by a hybrid approach: A qualitative mapping technique was applied when the indicators were identified, and weights for the indicators were set using a quantitative rating technique. The experts identified 49 indicators of cultural sustainability. Most of the generated indicators were relevant for local uses and highlighted the perceptions of the general public. Furthermore, most of the indicators were relevant from the perspective of raw material acquisition. Applying methods of differing backgrounds enabled advanced problem structuring, which allowed the identification of indicators suitable for assessing cultural sustainability of wood-based bioenergy in Eastern Finland. The quantitative rating technique enabled the determination of the importance of the indicators generated. Nevertheless, it seems that the hybrid approaches have many challenges related to the quantitative measuring of the participants’ perceptions. Cultural sustainability indicators should be identified within a case study, since it seems that most of the cultural sustainability indicators are case specific. The process introduced here offers steps for identifying case-specific cultural sustainability indicators; however, the concept of cultural sustainability cannot be strictly defined.

[1]  O. Petkova,et al.  Mixing Multiple Criteria Decision Making with soft systems thinking techniques for decision support in complex situations , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[2]  R. Stedman,et al.  Moving towards local-level indicators of sustainability in forest-based communities: A mixed-method approach , 2001 .

[3]  Pekka Leskinen,et al.  Sustainability assessment of wood-based bioenergy A methodological framework and a case-study , 2013 .

[4]  T. L. Saaty.  A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[5]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology , 2020, Systems Approaches to Making Change: A Practical Guide.

[6]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[7]  G. Kelly.  The Psychology of Personal Constructs , 2020 .

[8]  Rudolf de Groot,et al.  Critical natural capital: a socio-cultural perspective , 2003 .

[9]  Mark Reed,et al.  An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities , 2006 .

[10]  T. Buchholz,et al.  Sustainability criteria for bioenergy systems: results from an expert survey , 2009 .

[11]  Guillermo A. Mendoza,et al.  Qualitative multi-criteria approaches to assessing indicators of sustainable forest resource management , 2003 .

[12]  Mikko Kurttila,et al.  Measuring and Monitoring Socio- Cultural Sustainability in the Action of Forest Biodiversity Cooperation Networks , 2012 .

[13]  Sue Holwell,et al.  Systems Approaches to Making Change: A Practical Guide , 2010 .

[14]  Roger Frost,et al.  International Organization for Standardization (ISO) , 2004 .

[15]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS: THE PROMETHEE METHOD , 1986 .

[16]  Koichiro Matsuura,et al.  UNESCO Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity , 2005 .

[17]  Patrick McAlpine,et al.  Bottom up and top down: analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[18]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples , 1968 .

[19]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited , 2001 .

[20]  H. Vacik,et al.  Mapping indicator models: From intuitive problem structuring to quantified decision-making in sustainable forest management , 2011 .

[21]  Vincent C. Van Hulle.  Nurses’ perceptions of children's pain: A Pilot study of cognitive representations , 2007 .

[22]  Carlos A. Bana e Costa,et al.  The MACBETH Approach: Basic Ideas, Software, and an Application , 1999 .

[23]  Marc Roubens,et al.  Advances in decision analysis , 1999 .

[24]  P. Glavič,et al.  Indicators of sustainable production , 2003 .

[25]  M. El-Haram,et al.  A critical review of reductionist approaches for assessing the progress towards sustainability , 2008 .

[26]  P. Leskinen,et al.  A systematic literature review on indicators to assess local sustainability of forest energy production , 2014 .

[27]  G. Munda.  “Measuring Sustainability”: A Multi-Criterion Framework , 2005 .

[28]  Valentina Ferretti,et al.  Integrated sustainability assessments: a spatial multicriteria evaluation for siting a waste incinerator plant in the Province of Torino (Italy) , 2012, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[29]  W. Edwards,et al.  Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research , 1986 .

[30]  L Diaz Balteiro.  MAKING FORESTRY DECISIONS WITH MULTIPLE CRITERIA: A REVIEW AND AN ASSESSMENT , 2008 .

[31]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[32]  P. Leskinen,et al.  Numerical scaling of ratio scale utilities in multi-criteria decision analysis with geometric model , 2008, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[33]  Diana Gallego Carrera,et al.  Sustainability assessment of energy technologies via social indicators: Results of a survey among European energy experts , 2010 .

[34]  Carlos A. Bana e Costa,et al.  A career choice problem: An example of how to use MACBETH to build a quantitative value model based on qualitative value judgments , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  Keith Nurse,et al.  Culture as the Fourth Pillar of Sustainable Development , 2006 .

[36]  Lasse Okkonen,et al.  Regional socio-economic impacts of decentralised bioeconomy: a case of Suutela wooden village, Finland , 2013, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[37]  T. Mrosek,et al.  Field testing of a criteria and indicators system for sustainable forest management at the local level. Case study results concerning the sustainability of the private forest Haliburton Forest and Wild Life Reserve in Ontario, Canada , 2006 .

[38]  Niki Frantzeskaki,et al.  Sustainable energy planning by using multi-criteria analysis application in the island of Crete , 2009 .

[39]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Participatory multicriteria decision analysis with Web-HIPRE: a case of lake regulation policy , 2004, Environ. Model. Softw..

[40]  R. Gregory,et al.  Incorporating Value Trade-offs into Community-Based Environmental Risk Decisions , 2002, Environmental Values.

[41]  Jay W. Forrester,et al.  System dynamics, systems thinking, and soft OR , 1994 .

[42]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Toward a Methodology for the Measurement of Knowledge Structures of Ordinary People , 1997 .

[43]  A. Kangas,et al.  Decision Support in Assessing the Sustainable Use of Forests and Other Natural Resources - A Comparative Review , 2011 .

[44]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity , 1996 .

[45]  A. Stirling.  Analysis, participation and power: justification and closure in participatory multi-criteria analysis , 2006 .

[46]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[47]  Guillermo A. Mendoza,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms , 2006 .