Look Again: Effects of Brain Images and Mind–Brain Dualism on Lay Evaluations of Research

Brain scans have frequently been credited with uniquely seductive and persuasive qualities, leading to claims that fMRI research receives a disproportionate share of public attention and funding. It has been suggested that functional brain images are fascinating because they contradict dualist beliefs regarding the relationship between the body and the mind. Although previous research has indicated that brain images can increase judgments of an article's scientific reasoning, the hypotheses that brain scans make research appear more interesting, surprising, or worthy of funding have not been tested. Neither has the relation between the allure of brain imaging and dualism. In the following three studies, laypersons rated both fictional research descriptions and real science news articles accompanied by brain scans, bar charts, or photographs. Across 988 participants, we found little evidence of neuroimaging's seductive allure or of its relation to self-professed dualistic beliefs. These results, taken together with other recent null findings, suggest that brain images are less powerful than has been argued.

[1]  Evian Gordon.  Integrative psychophysiology. , 2001, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[2]  Matthew B. Crawford.  Scientific and Philosophical Perspectives in Neuroethics: The limits of neuro-talk , 2010 .

[3]  Cayce J. Hook,et al.  The Seductive Allure of “Seductive Allure” , 2013, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[4]  Michael Lifshitz,et al.  Empirical neuroenchantment: from reading minds to thinking critically , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[5]  H. Merckelbach,et al.  Alters in dissociative identity disorder. Metaphors or genuine entities? , 2002, Clinical psychology review.

[6]  James P. Byrnes,et al.  Educational neuroscience: definitional, methodological, and interpretive issues. , 2015, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[7]  D. K. Marcus,et al.  The effects of neuroimaging and brain injury on insanity defenses. , 2008, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[8]  R. Ratcliff.  The role of mathematical psychology in experimental psychology , 1998 .

[9]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Brain imaging and cognitive neuroscience. Toward strong inference in attributing function to structure. , 1996, The American psychologist.

[10]  Siddharth Suri,et al.  Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[11]  Deena Skolnick Weisberg,et al.  The Seductive Allure of Neuroscience Explanations , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[13]  Carolyn Remick,et al.  Editorial , 2013, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp..

[14]  J. Illes,et al.  ELSI Priorities for Brain Imaging , 2006, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[15]  E. Greene,et al.  Effects of neuroimaging evidence on mock juror decision making. , 2012, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[16]  Alan D. Castel,et al.  Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning , 2008, Cognition.

[17]  E. Stern,et al.  Functional Neuroimaging and Neuropsychology: Convergence, Advances and New Directions , 2001 .

[18]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  Different clues from different views: The role of image format in public perceptions of neuroimaging results , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis,et al.  Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.

[20]  J. Giedd,et al.  Adolescent maturity and the brain: the promise and pitfalls of neuroscience research in adolescent health policy. , 2009, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[21]  Laura Chamberlain,et al.  What is "neuromarketing"? A discussion and agenda for future research. , 2007, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[22]  Diego Fernandez-Duque,et al.  Superfluous Neuroscience Information Makes Explanations of Psychological Phenomena More Appealing , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  N. J. Schweitzer,et al.  Neuroimage evidence and the insanity defense. , 2011, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[24]  P. Garfinkel,et al.  Psychiatry in the New Millennium , 2000, Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie.

[25]  Evan F. Risko,et al.  Fooled by the brain: Re-examining the influence of neuroimages , 2013, Cognition.

[26]  Steven Laureys,et al.  Dualism Persists in the Science of Mind , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[27]  E. Murphy,et al.  Neuroimages as Evidence in a Mens Rea Defense: No Impact , 2011 .

[28]  Jonathan H. Marks,et al.  A Neuroskeptic's Guide to Neuroethics and National Security , 2010 .

[29]  David R. Gruber,et al.  Persuasive images in popular science: Testing judgments of scientific reasoning and credibility , 2012, Public understanding of science.

[30]  Judy Illes,et al.  Neurotalk: improving the communication of neuroscience research , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[31]  B. Peterson,et al.  Developmental processes and brain imaging studies in Tourette syndrome. , 2003, Journal of Psychosomatic Research.

[32]  Chris M. Nicholson.  Thinking It Over: fMRI and Psychological Science , 2006 .

[33]  CAVEAT LECTOR: THE PRESENTATION OF NEUROSCIENCE INFORMATION IN THE POPULAR MEDIA , 2008 .

[34]  M. Brammer.  Statistical analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data: current state and recent developments. , 2003, Statistical methods in medical research.

[35]  Geoff Cumming,et al.  On the (non)persuasive power of a brain image , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  Matthew G. Rhodes,et al.  The influence of FMRI lie detection evidence on juror decision-making. , 2011, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[37]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Implicit Philosophies of Mind: The Dualism Scale and Its Relation to Religiosity and Belief in Extrasensory Perception , 1989 .