Mapping landscape services: A case study in a multifunctional rural landscape in The Netherlands

The wide variety of landscape services, e.g. food production, water quality, and recreation, necessitates the use of a wide range of data sources for their identification. Subsequently, an array of approaches is required to analyse and map differ different landscape services, which we have explored in this study. Approaches to identify and map four landscape services are illustrated for the municipalities Deurne and Asten in province Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands: wetland habitat, forest recreation, land-based animal husbandry, and recreation for hikers. The landscape services were identified through ground observations at 389 locations. Spatial indicators were used to identify and map the landscape services. Based on the ground observations, correlations between the landscape services and spatial characteristics (e.g. elevation, soil, road-type) were calculated within a neighbourhood with a radius of 0 m, 50 m, and 100 m. These correlations identified several site-specific indicators to map the landscape services. The accuracy of the landscape service maps created was assessed. The indicators proved to be adequately reliable for forest recreation and reasonably reliable for land-based animal husbandry and recreation for hikers. Only landscape service map forest recreation was shown to be highly accurate. The four landscape services rarely coincide, but within a 1 km radius it is apparent that some occur closer together. The approach that we have used is applicable for a wide range of different services and establishes a fundamental basis for determining their spatial variation. As such, it should provide vital information for policy makers and spatial planners.

[1]  L. Hein,et al.  Spatial characterization of landscape functions , 2008 .

[2]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[3]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services , 2006 .

[4]  R. Gil Pontius,et al.  Land-cover change model validation by an ROC method for the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA , 2001 .

[5]  Tim Hess,et al.  A framework for the assessment of ecosystem goods and services; a case study on lowland floodplains in England , 2010 .

[6]  G. Fry Multifunctional landscapes - towards transdisciplinary research , 2001 .

[7]  Peter H. Verburg,et al.  Sensitising rural policy: Assessing spatial variation in rural development options for Europe , 2011 .

[8]  Louise Willemen,et al.  Space for people, plants, and livestock? Quantifying interactions among multiple landscape functions in a Dutch rural region , 2010 .

[9]  Paul Schot,et al.  Land use change modelling: current practice and research priorities , 2004 .

[10]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes , 2006 .

[11]  Arnold Bregt,et al.  Measuring Visible Space to Assess Landscape Openness , 2011 .

[12]  Vasilios P. Papanastasis,et al.  Land Use Changes , 2012 .

[13]  R. DeFries,et al.  Land‐use choices: balancing human needs and ecosystem function , 2004 .

[14]  Iris Heller,et al.  Assessing Landscape Functions with Broad-Scale Environmental Data: Insights Gained from a Prototype Development for Europe , 2009, Environmental management.

[15]  Katharina Helming,et al.  Land use functions — a multifunctionality approach to assess the impact of land use changes on land use sustainability , 2008 .

[16]  Roy Haines-Young,et al.  Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: Mapping marginal changes and trade-offs , 2012 .

[17]  D. Horst,et al.  Mapping hotspots of multiple landscape functions: a case study on farmland afforestation in Scotland , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[18]  G. Wilson From ‘weak’ to ‘strong’ multifunctionality: Conceptualising farm-level multifunctional transitional pathways , 2008 .

[19]  D. Richardson,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management , 2008 .

[20]  O. Bastian,et al.  A framework for monitoring landscape functions: The Saxon Academy Landscape Monitoring Approach (SALMA), exemplified by soil investigations in the Kleine Spree floodplain (Saxony, Germany) , 2007 .

[21]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making , 2010 .

[22]  Lars Hein,et al.  Concept and valuation of landscape functions at different scales , 2007 .

[23]  J. W. Termorshuizen,et al.  Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development , 2009, Landscape Ecology.

[24]  S. Menard Applied Logistic Regression Analysis , 1996 .

[25]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[26]  Gretchen C Daily,et al.  Conservation Planning for Ecosystem Services , 2006, PLoS biology.

[27]  F. Müller,et al.  Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets , 2012 .

[28]  P. Verburg,et al.  From land cover change to land function dynamics: a major challenge to improve land characterization. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[29]  J. Holmes,et al.  Impulses towards a Multifunctional Transition in Rural Australia: Gaps in the Research Agenda. , 2006 .