Evaluation of Multibody Parafoil Dynamics Using Distributed Miniature Wireless Sensors

Guided parafoils are comprised of two primary bodies, a payload and parafoil. The payload encompasses the majority of the overall system mass; however, the parafoil generates the majority of aerodynamic loads and is the sole source of control. Despite the canopy being the source of control, the sensor systems used for guidance are located away from the parafoil. Many multi-body models exist in literature and use different degrees-of-freedom to represent parafoil-payload relative motion. However, in all cases, simulations are used to investigate how the relative motion between bodies affects the overall dynamics without experimental validation determining accuracy of the motion predicted. Lack of validation for parafoil-payload relative motion has primarily been due to challenges in accurately measuring parafoil canopy motion which include; its flexibility, light weight, need to be packed in a small volume before deployment, and connection through suspension lines to the payload. In this paper, multiple miniature wireless sensors are embedded in the parafoil canopy and payload during flight and used to measure the parafoil-payload relative motion. Experimental measurements are then compared to a nine degree-of-freedom model and relative payload-parafoil motion is analyzed.

[1]  Christiaan Redelinghuys,et al.  A Flight Simulation Algorithm for a Parafoil Suspending an Air Vehicle , 2007 .

[2]  Mark Costello,et al.  Aspects of Control for a Parafoil and Payload System , 2003 .

[3]  Glen Brown,et al.  Apparent mass effects on parafoil dynamics , 1993 .

[4]  Thomas Jann Aerodynamic Model Identification and GNC Design for the Parafoil-Load System ALEX , 2001 .

[5]  Mike Henry,et al.  DOD New JPADS Programs and NATO Activities , 2009 .

[6]  Gottfried Sachs,et al.  A High-fidelity Nonlinear Multibody Simulation Model for Parafoil Systems , 2003 .

[7]  Sanjay Patel,et al.  DOD JPADS Programs Overview & NATO Activities , 2007 .

[8]  Gordon Strickert Study on the relative motion of parafoil-load-systems , 2004 .

[9]  Mark Costello,et al.  Use of Variable Incidence Angle for Glide Slope Control of Autonomous Parafoils , 2007 .

[10]  Erwin Mooij,et al.  9 dof Parafoil/Payload Simulator Development and Validation , 2003 .

[11]  R. Blevins,et al.  Formulas for natural frequency and mode shape , 1984 .

[12]  Vladimir Dobrokhodov,et al.  ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SIX-DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM MODEL OF A LOW- ASPECT-RATIO PARAFOIL DELIVERY SYSTEM , 2003 .

[13]  Oleg A. Yakimenko,et al.  Terminal Guidance of Autonomous Parafoils in High Wind-To-Airspeed Ratios , 2011 .

[14]  T. Barrows Apparent Mass of Parafoils with Spanwise Camber , 2001 .

[15]  Mark Costello,et al.  Model Predictive Control of a Parafoil and Payload System , 2004 .

[16]  Gordon Strickert,et al.  Analysis of the Relative Motion in a Parafoil-Load-System , 2001 .

[17]  Nathan Slegers,et al.  Development and Testing of the Miniature Aerial Delivery System Snowflake , 2009 .

[18]  Thomas Jann,et al.  Determination of the relative motion between parafoil canopy and load using advanced video-image processing techniques , 1999 .

[19]  Nathan Slegers,et al.  Effects of Canopy-Payload Relative Motion on Control of Autonomous Parafoils , 2009 .