Root Zone Sensors for Irrigation Management in Intensive Agriculture

Crop irrigation uses more than 70% of the world’s water, and thus, improving irrigation efficiency is decisive to sustain the food demand from a fast-growing world population. This objective may be accomplished by cultivating more water-efficient crop species and/or through the application of efficient irrigation systems, which includes the implementation of a suitable method for precise scheduling. At the farm level, irrigation is generally scheduled based on the grower’s experience or on the determination of soil water balance (weather-based method). An alternative approach entails the measurement of soil water status. Expensive and sophisticated root zone sensors (RZS), such as neutron probes, are available for the use of soil and plant scientists, while cheap and practical devices are needed for irrigation management in commercial crops. The paper illustrates the main features of RZS’ (for both soil moisture and salinity) marketed for the irrigation industry and discusses how such sensors may be integrated in a wireless network for computer-controlled irrigation and used for innovative irrigation strategies, such as deficit or dual-water irrigation. The paper also consider the main results of recent or current research works conducted by the authors in Tuscany (Italy) on the irrigation management of container-grown ornamental plants, which is an important agricultural sector in Italy.

[1]  Fabio Bartolini,et al.  Water Policy and Sustainability of Irrigated Farming Systems in Italy , 2005 .

[2]  Gerrit H. de Rooij,et al.  Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 4. Physical Methods , 2004 .

[3]  A. P. Annan,et al.  Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines , 1980 .

[4]  P. Stradiot,et al.  THE GRODAN WATER CONTENT METER FOR ROOT MANAGEMENT IN STONEWOOL , 2001 .

[5]  G. Incrocci,et al.  The calibration of WET-sensor for volumetric water content and pore water electrical conductivity in different horticultural substrates , 2009 .

[6]  A. Klute.  Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. , 1988 .

[7]  W. A. Take,et al.  A porous‐matrix sensor to measure the matric potential of soil water in the field , 2007 .

[8]  Axel Ritter,et al.  Performance of the Commercial WET Capacitance Sensor as Compared with Time Domain Reflectometry in Volcanic Soils , 2007 .

[9]  H. Vereecken,et al.  Evaluation of a low-cost soil water content sensor for wireless network applications , 2007 .

[10]  Jan W. Hopmans,et al.  Frequency, electrical conductivity and temperature analysis of a low-cost capacitance soil moisture sensor , 2008 .

[11]  John Burland,et al.  Use of the tensile strength of water for the direct measurement of high soil suction: Discussion , 1999 .

[12]  William C. Fonteno,et al.  Hydrology of Horticultural Substrates: II. Predicting Physical Properties of Media in Containers , 1989, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science.

[13]  Steve B. Orloff,et al.  Effectiveness of tensiometers and electrical resistance sensors varies with soil conditions , 2000 .

[14]  Dani Or,et al.  Who invented the tensiometer , 2001 .

[15]  Jochen Hemming,et al.  Sensors and wireless sensor networks for irrigation management under deficit conditions (FLOW-AID) , 2008 .

[16]  Michael D. Dukes,et al.  Tomato yield, biomass accumulation, root distribution and irrigation water use efficiency on a sandy soil, as affected by nitrogen rate and irrigation scheduling , 2009 .

[17]  A. Baille.  Water management in soilless cultivation in relation to inside and outside climatic conditions and type of substrate , 2001 .

[18]  Calvin D. Perry,et al.  A real-time wireless smart sensor array for scheduling irrigation , 2008 .

[19]  G. Incrocci,et al.  What limits and how to improve water use efficiency in outdoor container cultivation of ornamental nursery stocks. , 2009 .

[20]  R. Whalley,et al.  Response of cucumber to deficit irrigation. , 2009 .

[21]  Malcolm D. Bolton,et al.  Tensiometer saturation and the reliable measurement of soil suction , 2003 .

[22]  Magnus Persson,et al.  Soil water content and salinity determination using different dielectric methods in saline gypsiferous soil / Détermination de la teneur en eau et de la salinité de sols salins gypseux à l'aide de différentes méthodes diélectriques , 2008 .

[23]  Rachel Cardell-Oliver,et al.  A Reactive Soil Moisture Sensor Network: Design and Field Evaluation , 2005, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[24]  H. Jones.  Irrigation scheduling: advantages and pitfalls of plant-based methods. , 2004, Journal of experimental botany.

[25]  Rodney B. Thompson,et al.  Using plant water status to define threshold values for irrigation management of vegetable crops using soil moisture sensors , 2007 .

[26]  M. A. Hilhorst.  Dielectric characterisation of soil. , 1998 .

[27]  Alessandro Tarantino,et al.  Experimental procedures and cavitation mechanisms in tensiometer measurements , 2001 .

[28]  Dani Or,et al.  A new soil metric potential sensor based on time domain reflectometry , 1999 .

[29]  Rodney B. Thompson,et al.  Identification of irrigation and N management practices that contribute to nitrate leaching loss from an intensive vegetable production system by use of a comprehensive survey , 2007 .

[30]  E. Krüger,et al.  Scheduling strawberry irrigation based upon tensiometer measurement and a climatic water balance model , 1999 .

[31]  F. Ferrini,et al.  Municipal-treated wastewater reuse for plant nurseries irrigation. , 2004, Water research.

[32]  L. Bacci,et al.  IRRIGATION CONTROL OF CONTAINER CROPS BY MEANS OF TENSIOMETERS , 2003 .

[33]  J. H. Lieth,et al.  Growth Response of Chrysanthemum to Various Container Medium Moisture Tension Levels , 1992 .

[34]  Steven J. Thomson,et al.  Calibration of the Watermark Model 200 Soil Moisture Sensor , 1987 .

[35]  C. Dirksen,et al.  IMPROVED CALIBRATION OF TIME DOMAIN REFLECTOMETRY SOIL WATER CONTENT MEASUREMENTS , 1993 .

[36]  E. J. van Henten,et al.  Wireless sensor networks: state of the art and future perspective , 2008 .

[37]  M. A. Hilhorst.  A Pore Water Conductivity Sensor , 2000 .

[38]  W. Rawls,et al.  Soil Water Characteristic Estimates by Texture and Organic Matter for Hydrologic Solutions , 2006 .

[39]  Yakov A. Pachepsky,et al.  Performance of TDR calibration models as affected by soil texture , 1999 .

[40]  L. S. Pereira,et al.  Crop evapotranspiration : guidelines for computing crop water requirements , 1998 .

[41]  J. Balendonck,et al.  WET-sensor, application note , 2001 .

[42]  O. Verdonck,et al.  METHOD FOR MEASURING THE WATERRELEASE CURVE OF ORGANIC SUBSTRATES. , 1974 .

[43]  Michael J. Delwiche,et al.  Site-Specific Water and Chemical Application by Wireless Valve Controller Network , 2008 .

[44]  Joshua Anhalt,et al.  A Low-cost Multihop Wireless Sensor Network, Enabling Real-Time Management of Environmental Data for the Greenhouse and Nursery Industry , 2008 .

[45]  L. Bacci,et al.  An integrated method for irrigation scheduling of potted plants , 2008 .

[46]  J. Balendonck,et al.  WET-sensor pore water EC calibration for three horticultural soils , 2005 .

[47]  André Gosselin,et al.  Improvements in Automatic Irrigation of Peat-grown Greenhouse Tomatoes , 1994 .

[48]  C. Sonneveld,et al.  Soil analysis by means of a 1:2 volume extract , 1971, Plant and Soil.

[49]  Michael J. Delwiche,et al.  Solar-Powered, Wirelessly-Networked Valves for Site-Specific Irrigation , 2006 .

[50]  Richard P. Regan.  WATER CONSERVATION IN CONTAINER PRODUCTION NURSERIES—IRRIGATION SCHEDULING , 1996 .

[51]  M. G. McCarthy,et al.  Regulated deficit irrigation and partial rootzone drying as irrigation management techniques for grapevines , 2002 .