An improved statistical approach for consistency test in AHP

The pair-wise comparison matrix (PCM) is widely used in multi-criteria decision making methods. If the PCM is inconsistent, the resulting priority vector is not reliable. Hence, it is necessary to measure the level of the inconsistency of the PCM. There are two approaches for testing the consistency of the PCM: deterministic approaches and statistical or stochastic approaches. In this paper, an improved statistical approach to test the consistency of the PCM is proposed, which combines hypothesis test and maximum likelihood estimation. The proposed statistical approach is flexible and reliable because it sets a suitable significance level according to different situations. Two numerical examples are introduced to illustrate the proposed statistical approach.

[1]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1983 .

[2]  José María Moreno-Jiménez,et al.  Reciprocal distributions in the analytic hierarchy process , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Miroslaw Kwiesielewicz,et al.  Inconsistent and contradictory judgements in pairwise comparison method in the AHP , 2004, Comput. Oper. Res..

[4]  P. D. Jong A statistical approach to Saaty's scaling method for priorities , 1984 .

[5]  Y. Shen,et al.  A probability distribution and convergence of the consistency index u in the analytic hierarchy process , 1990 .

[6]  Luis G. Vargas The consistency index in reciprocal matrices: Comparison of deterministic and statistical approaches , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Alessio Ishizaka,et al.  Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  H. Monsuur An intrinsic consistency threshold for reciprocal matrices , 1997 .

[9]  William E. Stein,et al.  The harmonic consistency index for the analytic hierarchy process , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Gang Kou,et al.  Analytic network process in risk assessment and decision analysis , 2014, Comput. Oper. Res..

[11]  Gang Kou,et al.  A simple method to improve the consistency ratio of the pair-wise comparison matrix in ANP , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  G. Crawford,et al.  A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices , 1985 .

[13]  R. Jiang,et al.  Scale transitivity in the AHP , 2003, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[14]  Yi Peng,et al.  Ensemble of Software Defect Predictors: an AHP-Based Evaluation Method , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[15]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[16]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[17]  Stanislav Karapetrovic,et al.  A quality control approach to consistency paradoxes in AHP , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Luis G. Vargas Reciprocal matrices with random coefficients , 1982 .

[19]  Lu Sun,et al.  Multicriteria Group Decision Making: Optimal Priority Synthesis from Pairwise Comparisons , 2006 .

[20]  Luis G. Vargas An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications , 1990 .

[21]  Alessio Ishizaka,et al.  An expert module to improve the consistency of AHP matrices , 2004 .

[22]  José María Moreno-Jiménez,et al.  The geometric consistency index: Approximated thresholds , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  James W. Kolari,et al.  Deriving weights from general pairwise comparison matrices , 2008, Math. Soc. Sci..

[24]  Yi Peng,et al.  FAMCDM: A fusion approach of MCDM methods to rank multiclass classification algorithms , 2011 .

[25]  M. T. Lamata,et al.  A new measure of consistency for positive reciprocal matrices , 2003 .

[26]  Carlos A. Bana e Costa,et al.  A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  María Teresa Lamata,et al.  Consistency in the Analytic Hierarchy Process: a New Approach , 2006, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[28]  Gang Kou,et al.  Questionnaire design improvement and missing item scores estimation for rapid and efficient decision making , 2012, Ann. Oper. Res..

[29]  P. Tadikamalla,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process in an uncertain environment: A simulation approach , 1996 .

[30]  X. Zeshui,et al.  A consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy process , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  M. Degroot,et al.  Probability and Statistics , 2021, Examining an Operational Approach to Teaching Probability.

[32]  Ying Luo,et al.  Aggregation of direct and indirect judgments in pairwise comparison matrices with a re-examination of the criticisms by Bana e Costa and Vansnick , 2009, Inf. Sci..

[33]  Raffaello Seri,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Theory of Measurement , 2010, Manag. Sci..