The turn to work in organization and management theory: Some implications for strategic organization

Over the past decade, the study of management and organization theory has experienced a significant ‘turn to work’. This turn to work has not, however, been a return to the study of the forms of work that have been the traditional focus of organizational scholars. Instead, the turn to work involves a widespread scholarly engagement with new forms of work that involve individuals and organizations purposefully and strategically expending effort to affect their social-symbolic context. For example, boundary work (Gieryn, 1983; Kreiner et al.,2009), identity work (Ibarra and Barbulescu, 2010; Watson, 2008) and institutional work (Lawrence and Suddaby, 2006; Zietsma and Lawrence,2010) have all become important areas of scholarship despite being largely unknown or unexplored just a few years ago. Although the streams of research on various new forms of work are largely disconnected at present, we argue that together they represent an important trend in the study of management and organization with important ramifications for researchers interested in strategic organization. In this essay, we introduce the turn to work, explain what it is and why it has occurred, discuss its implications for the field of strategic organization and propose some new research directions for strategic organization that incorporate this turn to work.

[1]  R. Whittington Completing the Practice Turn in Strategy Research , 2006 .

[2]  T. Lawrence,et al.  Institutional Work in the Transformation of an Organizational Field: The Interplay of Boundary Work and Practice Work , 2010 .

[3]  Richard Whittington,et al.  Practices of Strategising/Organising: Broadening Strategy Work and Skills , 2006 .

[4]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[5]  M. Lounsbury Cultural Entrepreneurship: Stories, Legitimacy and the Acquisition of Resources , 2001 .

[6]  C. R. Hinings,et al.  Organizational Diversity and Change in Institutional Theory , 1998 .

[7]  Chris Warhurst,et al.  Employee experience of aesthetic labour in retail and hospitality , 2007 .

[8]  A. Hochschild Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure , 1979, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Of strategies, deliberate and emergent , 1985, Strategic Management Journal.

[10]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Values Work: A Process Study of the Emergence and Performance of Organizational Values Practices , 2013 .

[11]  M. Glynn When Cymbals Become Symbols: Conflict Over Organizational Identity Within a Symphony Orchestra , 2000 .

[12]  Glen E. Kreiner,et al.  BALANCING BORDERS AND BRIDGES: NEGOTIATING THE WORK-HOME INTERFACE VIA BOUNDARY WORK TACTICS , 2009 .

[13]  M. Lamont,et al.  The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences , 2002 .

[14]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[15]  H. Ibarra,et al.  Identity As Narrative: Prevalence, Effectiveness, and Consequences of Narrative Identity Work in Macro Work Role Transitions , 2010 .

[16]  Anat Rafaeli,et al.  Expression of Emotion as Part of the Work Role , 1987 .

[17]  S. Barley,et al.  Bringing Work Back In , 2001 .

[18]  T. Lawrence,et al.  Institutions and Institutional Work , 2006 .

[19]  B. Barnes Practice as collective action , 2005 .

[20]  Mats Alvesson,et al.  Managing Managerial Identities: Organizational Fragmentation, Discourse and Identity Struggle , 2003 .

[21]  D. Snow,et al.  Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment , 2000 .

[22]  K. K. Cetina,et al.  The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory , 2001 .

[23]  T. D'Aunno,et al.  Institutional Work and the Paradox of Embedded Agency , 2009 .

[24]  T. Watson,et al.  Managing Identity: Identity Work, Personal Predicaments and Structural Circumstances , 2008 .

[25]  T. Gieryn Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional , 1983 .