Homeostatic adjustment and metabolic remodeling in glucose-limited yeast cultures.

We studied the physiological response to glucose limitation in batch and steady-state (chemostat) cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by following global patterns of gene expression. Glucose-limited batch cultures of yeast go through two sequential exponential growth phases, beginning with a largely fermentative phase, followed by an essentially completely aerobic use of residual glucose and evolved ethanol. Judging from the patterns of gene expression, the state of the cells growing at steady state in glucose-limited chemostats corresponds most closely with the state of cells in batch cultures just before they undergo this "diauxic shift." Essentially the same pattern was found between chemostats having a fivefold difference in steady-state growth rate (the lower rate approximating that of the second phase respiratory growth rate in batch cultures). Although in both cases the cells in the chemostat consumed most of the glucose, in neither case did they seem to be metabolizing it primarily through respiration. Although there was some indication of a modest oxidative stress response, the chemostat cultures did not exhibit the massive environmental stress response associated with starvation that also is observed, at least in part, during the diauxic shift in batch cultures. We conclude that despite the theoretical possibility of a switch to fully aerobic metabolism of glucose in the chemostat under conditions of glucose scarcity, homeostatic mechanisms are able to carry out metabolic adjustment as if fermentation of the glucose is the preferred option until the glucose is entirely depleted. These results suggest that some aspect of actual starvation, possibly a component of the stress response, may be required for triggering the metabolic remodeling associated with the diauxic shift.

[1]  D. Botstein,et al.  Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  M. Carlson,et al.  Glucose repression in yeast. , 1999, Current opinion in microbiology.

[3]  C. Martínez-Campa,et al.  Transcriptional regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HXK1, HXK2 and GLK1 genes , 1995, Yeast.

[4]  D. Botstein,et al.  Systematic changes in gene expression patterns following adaptive evolution in yeast. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  J. Monod,et al.  Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. , 1961, Journal of Molecular Biology.

[6]  P. Brown,et al.  Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. , 1997, Science.

[7]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Glucose control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the role of Mig1 in metabolic functions. , 1998, Microbiology.

[8]  David Botstein,et al.  Characteristic genome rearrangements in experimental evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Duboc,et al.  An interlaboratory comparison of physiological and genetic properties of four Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. , 2000, Enzyme and microbial technology.

[10]  M. Schweizer,et al.  The metabolism and molecular physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1998 .

[11]  Mark Johnston,et al.  Glucose sensing and signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through the Rgt2 glucose sensor and casein kinase I. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  J. Berden,et al.  Expression and activity of the Hxt7 high‐affinity hexose transporter of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2001, Yeast.

[13]  J. Visser,et al.  Carbon metabolism. , 1994, Progress in industrial microbiology.

[14]  Jacques Monod,et al.  LA TECHNIQUE DE CULTURE CONTINUE THÉORIE ET APPLICATIONS , 1978 .

[15]  J. Diderich,et al.  Physiological Properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae from Which Hexokinase II Has Been Deleted , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[16]  I. Pedruzzi,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ras/cAMP pathway controls post‐diauxic shift element‐dependent transcription through the zinc finger protein Gis1 , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[17]  C. Verrips,et al.  Analysis of transcription and translation of glycolytic enzymes in glucose-limited continuous cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1992, Journal of general microbiology.

[18]  L. Hartwell,et al.  Genetic control of the cell division cycle in yeast. , 1974, Science.

[19]  M. Jacquet,et al.  High cAMP levels antagonize the reprogramming of gene expression that occurs at the diauxic shift in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1996, Microbiology.

[20]  David Botstein,et al.  Nutritional homeostasis in batch and steady-state culture of yeast. , 2004, Molecular biology of the cell.

[21]  M. Jacquet,et al.  Msn2p and Msn4p Control a Large Number of Genes Induced at the Diauxic Transition Which Are Repressed by Cyclic AMP inSaccharomyces cerevisiae , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[22]  T. Ferenci,et al.  Hungry bacteria--definition and properties of a nutritional state. , 2001, Environmental microbiology.

[23]  A. Novick,et al.  Description of the chemostat. , 1950, Science.

[24]  Curt Wittenberg,et al.  Grr1-dependent inactivation of Mth1 mediates glucose-induced dissociation of Rgt1 from HXT gene promoters. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.

[25]  P. Oeller,et al.  Physiological characterization of adaptive clones in evolving populations of the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1985, Genetics.

[26]  J. François,et al.  Dynamic responses of reserve carbohydrate metabolism under carbon and nitrogen limitations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1999, Yeast.

[27]  J. Pronk,et al.  The Genome-wide Transcriptional Responses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Grown on Glucose in Aerobic Chemostat Cultures Limited for Carbon, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Sulfur* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[28]  T. Jeffries,et al.  Respiratory efficiency and metabolite partitioning as regulatory phenomena in yeasts , 1990 .

[29]  David Botstein,et al.  The Stanford Microarray Database: data access and quality assessment tools , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[30]  D. Hartl,et al.  Selection in chemostats. , 1983, Microbiological reviews.

[31]  J. Pérez-Ortín,et al.  Stress response and expression patterns in wine fermentations of yeast genes induced at the diauxic shift , 2000, Yeast.

[32]  P. Ljungdahl,et al.  Sensors of extracellular nutrients in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2001, Current Genetics.

[33]  C. Paquin,et al.  Frequency of fixation of adaptive mutations is higher in evolving diploid than haploid yeast populations , 1983, Nature.

[34]  M. Perrot,et al.  The Transcriptional Activator Cat8p Provides a Major Contribution to the Reprogramming of Carbon Metabolism during the Diauxic Shift inSaccharomyces cerevisiae * , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[35]  C. Paquin,et al.  Relative fitness can decrease in evolving asexual populations of S. cerevisiae , 1983, Nature.

[36]  Mark Johnston,et al.  Function and Regulation of Yeast Hexose Transporters , 1999, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[37]  A. Kastaniotis,et al.  The Yeast Mitochondrial Proteome, a Study of Fermentative and Respiratory Growth* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[38]  D. Dykhuizen Chemostats used for studying natural selection and adaptive evolution. , 1993, Methods in enzymology.

[39]  T. Ferenci,et al.  Adaptive mgl-regulatory mutations and genetic diversity evolving in glucose-limited Escherichia coli populations. , 1999, Environmental microbiology.

[40]  D. Botstein,et al.  Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.