Multiconjugate adaptive optics results from the laboratory for adaptive optics MCAO/MOAO testbed.

We report on the development of wavefront reconstruction and control algorithms for multiconjugate adaptive optics (MCAO) and the results of testing them in the laboratory under conditions that simulate an 8 meter class telescope. The University of California Observatories (UCO) Lick Observatory Laboratory for Adaptive Optics multiconjugate testbed allows us to test wide-field-of-view adaptive optics systems as they might be instantiated in the near future on giant telescopes. In particular, we have been investigating the performance of MCAO using five laser beacons for wavefront sensing and a minimum-variance algorithm for control of two conjugate deformable mirrors. We have demonstrated improved Strehl ratio and enlarged field-of-view performance when compared to conventional AO techniques. We have demonstrated improved MCAO performance with the implementation of a routine that minimizes the generalized isoplanatism when turbulent layers do not correspond to deformable mirror conjugate altitudes. Finally, we have demonstrated suitability of the system for closed loop operation when configured to feed back conditional mean estimates of wavefront residuals rather than the directly measured residuals. This technique has recently been referred to as the "pseudo-open-loop" control law in the literature.

[1]  Luc Gilles,et al.  Robustness study of the pseudo open-loop controller for multiconjugate adaptive optics. , 2005, Applied optics.

[2]  Lisa A. Poyneer Advanced techniques for Fourier transform wavefront reconstruction , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[3]  Brian J. Bauman,et al.  MCAO for Gemini South , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[4]  D. Fried Focus anisoplanatism in the limit of infinitely many artificial-guide-star reference spots , 1995 .

[5]  Jacques M. Beckers,et al.  Increasing the size of the isoplanatic patch with multiconjugate adaptive optics. , 1988 .

[6]  Donald Gavel Stability of Closed-loop Tomography Algorithms for Adaptive Optics , 2005 .

[7]  Brian J. Bauman,et al.  First results from the UCSC Laboratory for Adaptive Optics multi-conjugate and multi-object adaptive optics testbed , 2006, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[8]  E. Marchetti,et al.  Modal tomography for adaptive optics , 1999 .

[9]  M. le Louarn,et al.  Analysis of modes and behavior of a multiconjugate adaptive optics system. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[10]  Donald Gavel Laboratory for adaptive optics at UC Santa Cruz: project status and plans , 2006, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[11]  Christoph Baranec,et al.  Tomographic reconstruction of stellar wavefronts from multiple laser guide stars , 2006, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[12]  Claire E. Max,et al.  Enabling laboratory demonstrations of multi-object adaptive optics with linearity calibrations , 2007, SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications.

[13]  Donald Gavel Tomography for multiconjugate adaptive optics systems using laser guide stars , 2004, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[14]  Mette Owner-Petersen,et al.  The Lund dual-conjugate adaptive optics demonstrator , 2004, Extremely Large Telescopes.

[15]  Richard J. Sasiela,et al.  Wave-front correction by one or more synthetic beacons , 1994 .

[16]  Steve Hegwer,et al.  Solar multiconjugate adaptive optics at the Dunn Solar Telescope: preliminary results , 2004, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[17]  Norbert Hubin,et al.  MAD on sky results in star oriented mode , 2007, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[18]  Roberto Ragazzoni,et al.  MAD the ESO multi-conjugate adaptive optics demonstrator , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[19]  R. Foy,et al.  Adaptive telescope with laser probe : isoplanatism and cone effect , 1990 .

[20]  A. Tokovinin,et al.  Isoplanatism in a multiconjugate adaptive optics system. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[21]  B. Ellerbroek First-order performance evaluation of adaptive optics systems for atmospheric turbulence compensatio , 1994 .

[22]  M. Troy,et al.  Multiple guide star tomography demonstration at Palomar Observatory , 2006, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.