Modelling the influence of incident radiation on the SIF-based GPP estimation for maize

Abstract Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) has been shown to be an ideal indicator of vegetation gross primary productivity (GPP), but the variation in the ratio of the photosynthetic light use efficiency (LUE = GPP/APAR) to the total SIF quantum yield (SIFyield = SIFtotal/APAR) is an important source of uncertainty in SIF‒GPP models. Incident radiation is one of the key factors influencing LUE and SIFyield. In this study, to investigate the influence of PAR on LUE and SIFyield, pulse-amplitude-modulated (PAM) fluorometry was carried out at the leaf level along with tower-based continuous SIF‒GPP measurements at the canopy level for maize. LUE was found to decrease as PAR increased, following a hyperbolic function, at both the leaf level (R2 = 0.978) and canopy level (R2 = 0.460 for half-hourly averaged dataset; R2 = 0.341 for daily averaged dataset). However, the variation of SIFyield with PAR was found to be very small. By integrating the influence of PAR on LUE, the GPP estimation model based on the red band and near-infrared (NIR) band SIF for maize became more linear. For both the half-hourly and daily datasets, the values of R2 for the SIF-GPP model increased (e.g. from 0.573 to 0.718 for the half-hourly NIR band SIF), and the RMSE for the estimated GPP reduced (e.g. from 8.30 to 6.75 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1 for the half-hourly NIR band SIF). These results highlight that the ratio of LUE to SIFyield is an important source of uncertainty in SIF‒GPP models and should be carefully corrected. The results also show that PAR is a key factor influencing this ratio. This PAR-based LUE model can be integrated not only in SIF‒GPP models but also in other LUE-related GPP estimation models for unstressed maize.

[1]  A. Porcar-Castell,et al.  A high-resolution portrait of the annual dynamics of photochemical and non-photochemical quenching in needles of Pinus sylvestris. , 2011, Physiologia plantarum.

[2]  Y. Ryu,et al.  A practical approach for estimating the escape ratio of near-infrared solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[3]  Liangyun Liu,et al.  Improving the potential of red SIF for estimating GPP by downscaling from the canopy level to the photosystem level , 2020 .

[4]  L. Guanter,et al.  Model-based analysis of the relationship between sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and gross primary production for remote sensing applications , 2016 .

[5]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  From the Ground to Space: Using Solar‐Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence to Estimate Crop Productivity , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.

[6]  Anatoly A. Gitelson,et al.  Relationship between fraction of radiation absorbed by photosynthesizing maize and soybean canopies and NDVI from remotely sensed data taken at close range and from MODIS 250 m resolution data , 2014 .

[7]  A. Gitelson,et al.  Convergence of daily light use efficiency in irrigated and rainfed C3 and C4 crops , 2018, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[8]  Xi Yang,et al.  Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and its link to canopy photosynthesis in maize from continuous ground measurements , 2020 .

[9]  J. Anderson,et al.  Adjustments of photosystem stoichiometry in chloroplasts improve the quantum efficiency of photosynthesis. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Xi Yang,et al.  On the Covariation of Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Photosynthesis Across Scales , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.

[11]  Liangyun Liu,et al.  Directly estimating diurnal changes in GPP for C3 and C4 crops using far-red sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence , 2017 .

[12]  J. Berry,et al.  Canopy structure explains the relationship between photosynthesis and sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence in crops , 2020 .

[13]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  Moisture availability mediates the relationship between terrestrial gross primary production and solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence: Insights from global‐scale variations , 2020, Global change biology.

[14]  J. Berry,et al.  Models of fluorescence and photosynthesis for interpreting measurements of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence , 2014, Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences.

[15]  L. Hutyra,et al.  Solar‐Induced Fluorescence Does Not Track Photosynthetic Carbon Assimilation Following Induced Stomatal Closure , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.

[16]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  Using field spectroscopy to assess the potential of statistical approaches for the retrieval of sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence from ground and space , 2013 .

[17]  Yi Peng,et al.  Productivity, absorbed photosynthetically active radiation, and light use efficiency in crops: implications for remote sensing of crop primary production. , 2015, Journal of plant physiology.

[18]  L. Guanter,et al.  Reduction of structural impacts and distinction of photosynthetic pathways in a global estimation of GPP from space-borne solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence , 2020 .

[19]  N. Baker Chlorophyll fluorescence: a probe of photosynthesis in vivo. , 2008, Annual review of plant biology.

[20]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  Global monitoring of terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence from moderate-spectral-resolution near-infrared satellite measurements: methodology, simulations, and application to GOME-2 , 2013 .

[21]  J. Monteith SOLAR RADIATION AND PRODUCTIVITY IN TROPICAL ECOSYSTEMS , 1972 .

[22]  T. Vesala,et al.  Advantages of diffuse radiation for terrestrial ecosystem productivity , 2002 .

[23]  Neus Sabater,et al.  Diurnal and Seasonal Solar Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Photosynthesis in a Boreal Scots Pine Canopy , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[24]  J. Berry,et al.  Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence is non-linearly related to canopy photosynthesis in a temperate evergreen needleleaf forest during the fall transition , 2021, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[25]  L. Guanter,et al.  Downscaling of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence from canopy level to photosystem level using a random forest model , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[26]  S. V. Caemmerer,et al.  Biochemical models of leaf photosynthesis. , 2000 .

[27]  C. Tol,et al.  Linking canopy scattering of far-red sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence with reflectance. , 2018 .

[28]  M. Rossini,et al.  Linking photosynthesis and sun-induced fluorescence at sub-daily to seasonal scales , 2018, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[29]  David M. Kramer,et al.  New Fluorescence Parameters for the Determination of QA Redox State and Excitation Energy Fluxes , 2004, Photosynthesis Research.

[30]  Xiangyu Tang,et al.  The Effects of Timing of Inundation on Soil Physical Quality in the Water‐Level Fluctuation Zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China , 2018 .

[31]  J. Eitel,et al.  On the Functional Relationship Between Fluorescence and Photochemical Yields in Complex Evergreen Needleleaf Canopies , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.

[32]  Jian Guo,et al.  SIFSpec: Measuring Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Observations for Remote Sensing of Photosynthesis , 2019, Sensors.

[33]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  Varying Contributions of Drivers to the Relationship Between Canopy Photosynthesis and Far‐Red Sun‐Induced Fluorescence for Two Maize Sites at Different Temporal Scales , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences.

[34]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  Linking chlorophyll a fluorescence to photosynthesis for remote sensing applications: mechanisms and challenges. , 2014, Journal of experimental botany.

[35]  J. Berry,et al.  Radiance-based NIRv as a proxy for GPP of corn and soybean , 2020, Environmental Research Letters.

[36]  J. Berry,et al.  A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species , 1980, Planta.

[37]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  Systematic Assessment of Retrieval Methods for Canopy Far‐Red Solar‐Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Using High‐Frequency Automated Field Spectroscopy , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences.

[38]  M. S. Moran,et al.  Global and time-resolved monitoring of crop photosynthesis with chlorophyll fluorescence , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  R. Colombo,et al.  Red and far red Sun‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence as a measure of plant photosynthesis , 2015 .

[40]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  New global observations of the terrestrial carbon cycle from GOSAT: Patterns of plant fluorescence with gross primary productivity , 2011, Geophysical Research Letters.

[41]  M. Schaepman,et al.  Far-red sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence shows ecosystem-specific relationships to gross primary production: An assessment based on observational and modeling approaches , 2015 .

[42]  David Baker,et al.  Using chlorophyll fluorescence to assess the fraction of absorbed light allocated to thermal dissipa , 2008 .

[43]  J. Berry,et al.  Sun‐Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence, Photosynthesis, and Light Use Efficiency of a Soybean Field from Seasonally Continuous Measurements , 2018 .

[44]  N. Baker,et al.  Resolving chlorophyll a fluorescence images of photosynthetic efficiency into photochemical and non-photochemical components – calculation of qP and Fv-/Fm-; without measuring Fo-; , 1997, Photosynthesis Research.

[45]  W. L. Butler,et al.  Quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence and primary photochemistry in chloroplasts by dibromothymoquinone. , 1975, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[46]  Yelu Zeng,et al.  A radiative transfer model for solar induced fluorescence using spectral invariants theory , 2020 .

[47]  J. Minagawa State transitions--the molecular remodeling of photosynthetic supercomplexes that controls energy flow in the chloroplast. , 2011, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[48]  J. Monteith Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain , 1977 .

[49]  K. Niyogi,et al.  A kinetic model of rapidly reversible nonphotochemical quenching , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  P. Blanken,et al.  Mechanistic evidence for tracking the seasonality of photosynthesis with solar-induced fluorescence , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  M. Bergin,et al.  Impact of atmospheric aerosol light scattering and absorption on terrestrial net primary productivity , 2002 .

[52]  L. Gu,et al.  Sun-induced Chl fluorescence and its importance for biophysical modeling of photosynthesis based on light reactions. , 2019, The New phytologist.

[53]  M. Rossini,et al.  Solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence that correlates with canopy photosynthesis on diurnal and seasonal scales in a temperate deciduous forest , 2015 .

[54]  J. Berry,et al.  Sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence is more strongly related to absorbed light than to photosynthesis at half-hourly resolution in a rice paddy , 2018, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[55]  Liangxu Wang,et al.  The Heihe Integrated Observatory Network: A Basin‐Scale Land Surface Processes Observatory in China , 2018 .

[56]  Shaomin Liu,et al.  A comparison of eddy-covariance and large aperture scintillometer measurements with respect to the energy balance closure problem , 2011 .

[57]  P. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  Relationships between net photosynthesis and steady-state chlorophyll fluorescence retrieved from airborne hyperspectral imagery , 2013 .