Experimental path-following of equilibria using Newton’s method. Part I: Theory, modelling, experiments

Abstract Modern numerical path-following techniques provide a comprehensive suite of computational tools to study the bifurcation behaviour of engineering structures. In contrast, experimental testing of load-bearing nonlinear structures is still performed using simple force control (dead loading) or displacement control (rigid loading). This means that established experimental methods cannot trace equilibrium manifolds in their entirety because structures snap to alternative equilibria at limit points in the forcing parameter and because branch switching to alternative equilibria cannot be controlled and performed reliably. To extend current testing methods, in Part I of this paper, we implement an experimental path-following method that uses tangent quantities (stiffness and residual forces) and Newton’s method to continue along stable and unstable equilibrium paths and traverse limit points. In addition to enforcing the displacement at primary load-introduction points, the overall shape of the structure is controlled via secondary actuators and sensors. Small perturbations of the structure using the secondary actuators allow an experimental tangent stiffness to be computed, which is then used in a control algorithm. As a pertinent test case, the experimental method is applied to a transversely loaded shallow circular arch. Due to the complexity of the test setup, the experiment is first designed using a virtual testing environment based on a surrogate finite element model. Experimental results demonstrate the robustness of the proposed experimental method and the usefulness of virtual testing as a surrogate, but also highlight that experimental efficiency and the effects of noise and sensor uncertainty is of particular concern. In Part II, we present perspectives on future research directions and novel testing capabilities that are enabled by extending the methodology to pinpointing of critical points, tracing of critical boundaries, and branch switching.

[1]  Farid Abed-Meraim,et al.  A proposed set of popular limit-point buckling benchmark problems , 2011 .

[2]  E. Riks An incremental approach to the solution of snapping and buckling problems , 1979 .

[3]  Anders Eriksson,et al.  Structural instability analyses based on generalised path-following , 1998 .

[4]  Rainer Groh,et al.  Generalised path-following for well-behaved nonlinear structures , 2018 .

[5]  L. Renson,et al.  Numerical continuation in nonlinear experiments using local Gaussian process regression , 2019, Nonlinear Dynamics.

[6]  Pedro M. Reis,et al.  A Perspective on the Revival of Structural (In) Stability With Novel Opportunities for Function: From Buckliphobia to Buckliphilia , 2015 .

[7]  Rigoberto Burgueño,et al.  Tailoring the elastic postbuckling response of cylindrical shells: A route for exploiting instabilities in materials and mechanical systems , 2015 .

[8]  Raf Theunissen,et al.  Adaptive compliant structures for flow regulation , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[9]  M. Schenk,et al.  Beyond the fold: experimentally traversing limit points in nonlinear structures , 2020, Proceedings of the Royal Society A.

[10]  Emmanuel Virot,et al.  Stability Landscape of Shell Buckling. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[11]  K. Bertoldi,et al.  Negative Poisson's Ratio Behavior Induced by an Elastic Instability , 2010, Advanced materials.

[12]  Ludovic Renson,et al.  Experimental Tracking of Limit-Point Bifurcations and Backbone Curves Using Control-Based Continuation , 2017, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[13]  M. Crisfield A FAST INCREMENTAL/ITERATIVE SOLUTION PROCEDURE THAT HANDLES "SNAP-THROUGH" , 1981 .

[14]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  A Review on Bistable Composite Laminates for Morphing and Energy Harvesting , 2015 .

[15]  Daniel C. Kammer Sensor placement for on-orbit modal identification and correlation of large space structures , 1991 .

[16]  Daniel C. Kammer,et al.  Optimal sensor placement for modal identification using system-realization methods , 1996 .

[17]  Keith A. Seffen,et al.  Surface Texturing Through Cylinder Buckling , 2014 .

[18]  Michael Gomez,et al.  Passive Control of Viscous Flow via Elastic Snap-Through. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[19]  Alberto Pirrera,et al.  Shape Control for Experimental Continuation. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[20]  Ryan L. Harne,et al.  A review of the recent research on vibration energy harvesting via bistable systems , 2013 .

[21]  Michele Meo,et al.  On the optimal sensor placement techniques for a bridge structure , 2005 .

[22]  J. M. T. Thompson,et al.  Optimization as a generator of structural instability , 1972 .

[23]  Brian L. Wardle Solution to the Incorrect Benchmark Shell-Buckling Problem , 2008 .

[24]  Jongmin Shim,et al.  Buckling-induced encapsulation of structured elastic shells under pressure , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.