Research-Based-Decision-Making in Canadian Health Organizations: A Behavioural Approach

Decision making in Health sector is affected by a several elements such as economic constraints, political agendas, epidemiologic events, managers’ values and environment … These competing elements create a complex environment for decision making. Research-Based-Decision-Making (RBDM) offers an opportunity to reduce the generated uncertainty and to ensure efficacy and efficiency in health administrations. We assume that RBDM is dependant on decision makers’ behaviour and the identification of the determinants of this behaviour can help to enhance research results utilization in health sector decision making. This paper explores the determinants of RBDM as a personal behaviour among managers and professionals in health administrations in Canada. From the behavioural theories and the existing literature, we build a model measuring “RBDM” as an index based on five items. These items refer to the steps accomplished by a decision maker while developing a decision which is based on evidence. The determinants of RBDM behaviour are identified using data collected from 942 health care decision makers in Canadian health organizations. Linear regression is used to model the behaviour RBDM. Determinants of this behaviour are derived from Triandis Theory and Bandura's construct “self-efficacy.” The results suggest that to improve research use among managers in Canadian governmental health organizations, strategies should focus on enhancing exposition to evidence through facilitating communication networks, partnerships and links between researchers and decision makers, with the key long-term objective of developing a culture that supports and values the contribution that research can make to decision making in governmental health organizations. Nevertheless, depending on the organizational level, determinants of RBDM are different. This difference has to be taken into account if RBDM adoption is desired. Decision makers in Canadian health organizations (CHO) can help to build networks, develop partnerships between professionals locally, regionally and nationally, and also act as change agents in the dissemination and adoption of knowledge and innovations in health services. However, the research focused on knowledge use as a support to decision-making, further research is needed to identify and evaluate effective incentives and strategies to implement so as to enhance RBDM adoption among health decision makers and more theoretical development are to complete in this perspective.

[1]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[2]  H. Triandis The Self and Social Behavior in Differing Cultural Contexts , 1989 .

[3]  D. Nutbeam,et al.  Improving the fit between research and practice in health promotion: overcoming structural barriers. , 1996, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[4]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Practice guidelines. What are internists looking for? , 1996, Journal of general internal medicine.

[5]  David K. Whynes,et al.  Towards an Evidence-Based National Health Service? , 1996 .

[6]  D. Sackett,et al.  Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't , 1996, BMJ.

[7]  M. Roland,et al.  Getting research into practice. , 1997, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[8]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[9]  C. Estabrooks,et al.  Will evidence-based nursing practice make practice perfect? , 1998, The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres.

[10]  P Carlsson,et al.  Economic evaluation of screening for prostate cancer: a randomized population based programme during a 10-year period in Sweden. , 1998, Health policy.

[11]  R. Thomson,et al.  Decision analysis in evidence-based decision making. , 2000, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[12]  K Walshe,et al.  Evidence-based management: from theory to practice in health care. , 2001, The Milbank quarterly.

[13]  Réjean Landry,et al.  Utilization of social science research knowledge in Canada , 2001 .

[14]  C Estabrooks,et al.  Decision aids: are they worth it? A systematic review , 2001, Journal of health services research & policy.

[15]  Sarv Devaraj,et al.  An empirical comparison of statistical construct validation approaches , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[16]  S. Bray,et al.  Pre-competition imagery, self-efficacy and performance in collegiate golfers , 2001, Journal of sports sciences.

[17]  Kyung Hee Shon,et al.  Medication and symptom management education program for the rehabilitation of psychiatric patients in Korea: the effects of promoting schedule on self-efficacy theory. , 2002, Yonsei medical journal.

[18]  Pratima Bansal,et al.  The Conventions of Management Research and their Relevance to Management Practice , 2002 .

[19]  Jan Barnsley,et al.  A framework for the dissemination and utilization of research for health-care policy and practice. , 2002, The online journal of knowledge synthesis for nursing.

[20]  Ellen Lavelle,et al.  The writing approaches of secondary students. , 2002, The British journal of educational psychology.

[21]  Gislaine Afonso de Souza,et al.  A auto-eficácia como mediadora da melhora em índices clínicos de saúde oral , 2002 .

[22]  Gislaine Afonso de Souza,et al.  [Self-efficacy as a mediator for improvement in oral health clinical indices]. , 2002, Pesquisa odontologica brasileira = Brazilian oral research.

[23]  Ronald R Lindstrom Evidence-based decision-making in healthcare: exploring the issues though the lens of complex, adaptive systems theory. , 2003, HealthcarePapers.

[24]  Susan Jones,et al.  Preoperative teaching and hysterectomy outcomes. , 2003, AORN journal.

[25]  Marie-Pierre Gagnon,et al.  An adaptation of the theory of interpersonal behaviour to the study of telemedicine adoption by physicians , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[26]  A. Bandura,et al.  Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[27]  Kevin P D Smith,et al.  The healthcare manager as catalyst for evidence-based practice: changing the healthcare environment and changing experience. , 2003, HealthcarePapers.

[28]  Geroge P Browman,et al.  Negotiating for change. The healthcare manager as catalyst for evidence-based practice: changing the healthcare environment and sharing experience. , 2003, HealthcarePapers.

[29]  B M Niedźwiedzka,et al.  Barriers to evidence-based decision making among Polish healthcare managers , 2003, Health services management research.

[30]  Craig Mitton,et al.  Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation Open Access Health Care Priority Setting: Principles, Practice and Challenges , 2022 .

[31]  R. Jeffery,et al.  How can Health Behavior Theory be made more useful for intervention research? , 2004, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[32]  G Godin,et al.  Evaluation of a theoretically based AIDS/STD peer education program on postponing sexual intercourse and on condom use among adolescents attending high school. , 2004, Health education research.

[33]  Maureen Dobbins,et al.  Use of systematic reviews in the development of new provincial public health policies in Ontario , 2004, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[34]  Nabil Amara,et al.  New Evidence on Instrumental, Conceptual, and Symbolic Utilization of University Research in Government Agencies , 2004 .

[35]  Leanne M. Casey,et al.  An integrated cognitive model of panic disorder: the role of positive and negative cognitions. , 2004, Clinical psychology review.

[36]  A. Hewison,et al.  Evidence-based management in the NHS: is it possible? , 2004, Journal of health organization and management.

[37]  S. Emin,et al.  Les facteurs déterminant la création d'entreprise par les chercheurs publics : application des modèles d'intention , 2004 .

[38]  Craig Mitton,et al.  Evidence-based priority-setting: what do the decision-makers think? , 2004, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy.

[39]  Albert Bandura,et al.  Social cognitive theory of posttraumatic recovery: the role of perceived self-efficacy. , 2004, Behaviour research and therapy.

[40]  Mark Helfand,et al.  Using evidence reports: progress and challenges in evidence-based decision making. , 2005, Health affairs.

[41]  Nina Stipich,et al.  Enhancing skills for evidence-based healthcare leadership: the Executive Training for Research Application (EXTRA) program. , 2005, Nursing leadership.

[42]  David Mowat,et al.  Fostering evidence-based decision-making in Canada: examining the need for a Canadian population and public health evidence centre and research network. , 2005, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[43]  Kevin Brazil,et al.  From theory to practice: improving the impact of health services research , 2005, BMC health services research.

[44]  Jane Hemsley-Brown,et al.  Using research to support management decision making within the field of education , 2005 .

[45]  Vivek Goel,et al.  The impact of context on evidence utilization: a framework for expert groups developing health policy recommendations. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[46]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Evidence-based management. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[47]  Nancy Harding,et al.  EVIDENCE‐BASED MANAGEMENT: THE VERY IDEA , 2006 .

[48]  R. Hayward,et al.  What are internists looking for? , 1996, Journal of General Internal Medicine.