THE LIMITS OF JOINED‐UP GOVERNMENT: TOWARDS A POLITICAL ANALYSIS

Joined-up government has featured prominently on the agenda of the New Labour government in the UK. However, the politics of joining-up remain under-explored, with disproportionate emphasis on the technical and managerial dimensions of the challenge. This paper argues that political value conflicts form an essential part of the explanation for the replication of 'silos' within city strategic partnerships, the joining-up institution of choice at the local scale. A study of the local politics of social inclusion in the British cities of Dundee and Hull revealed a strong partnership ethos. However, this ethos sustained only a shallow consensus over abstract goals, at the same time legitimating the avoidance of political value conflicts. Thematic partnerships comprising interest group clusters with different political values therefore tended to replicate silo practices. The paper argues, consequently, that the consensual partnership ethos caused the displacement of value conflicts, in turn causing fragmented governance. It concludes with three propositions for further research.

[1]  N. Mathur,et al.  Corporate Governance in a Collaborative Environment: What Happens When Government, Business and Civil Society Work Together? , 2006 .

[2]  S. Freud.  The Psychopathology of Everyday Life , 1915 .

[3]  E. Sørensen,et al.  The democratic Anchorage of Governance Networks , 2005 .

[4]  Erik-Hans Klijn,et al.  Partnership Arrangements: Governmental Rhetoric or Governance Scheme? , 2002 .

[5]  N. Fairclough,et al.  New Labour, New Language? , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  Mark Bevir,et al.  The Logic of the History of Ideas , 1999 .

[7]  Chris Skelcher,et al.  Jurisdictional Integrity, Polycentrism, and the Design of Democratic Governance , 2005 .

[8]  Christopher Pollitt,et al.  Joined-up Government: A Survey , 2003 .

[9]  John Medearis.  Social Movements and Deliberative Democratic Theory , 2005 .

[10]  David Chandler,et al.  Active citizens and the therapeutic state: the role of democratic participation in local government reform , 2001 .

[11]  M. Powell,et al.  The End of the Welfare State , 1998 .

[12]  Andrew Jordan,et al.  Coordinated European Governance: Self-Organizing or Centrally Steered? , 2005 .

[13]  Helen Sullivan.  Is Enabling Enough? Tensions and Dilemmas in New Labour's Strategies for Joining-up Local Governance , 2005 .

[14]  J. Friend,et al.  Partnership meets politics: managing within the maze , 2006 .

[15]  R. Rhodes,et al.  Interpretive Approaches to British Government and Politics , 2006 .

[16]  J. Davies,et al.  The governance of urban regeneration: a critique of the ‘governing without government’ thesis , 2002 .

[17]  B. Guy Peters,et al.  Managing Horizontal Government: The Politics of Co-Ordination , 1998 .

[18]  Y. Ahmad,et al.  Pedagogic implications of anxiety and loss of agency in public services managers and leaders , 2008 .

[19]  Catherine Durose,et al.  Governance and Collaboration: Review Article , 2006, Social Policy and Society.

[20]  C. Allen.  Desperately seeking fusion: on 'joined-up thinking', 'holistic practice' and the new economy of welfare professional power. , 2003, The British journal of sociology.

[21]  J. Davies,et al.  Conjuncture or Disjuncture? An Institutionalist Analysis of Local Regeneration Partnerships in the UK , 2004 .

[22]  S. Long.  Organizational defenses against anxiety: what has happened since the 1955 Jaques paper? , 2006 .

[23]  Michael Carley,et al.  Partnership and statutory local governance in a devolved Scotland , 2006 .

[24]  S. Osborne,et al.  Local Strategic Partnerships, Neighbourhood Renewal, and the Limits to Co-governance , 2003 .

[25]  L. Christiaensen,et al.  The Role of Agriculture in Poverty Reduction - an Empirical Perspective , 2006 .

[26]  A. Amin.  Local community on trial , 2005 .

[27]  J. Davies.  The Limits of Partnership: An Exit-Action Strategy for Local Democratic Inclusion , 2007 .

[28]  Chris Skelcher,et al.  The Public Governance of Collaborative Spaces: Discourse, Design and Democracy , 2005 .

[29]  P. Bourdieu.  Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* , 2018, Food and Culture.

[30]  T. Ling.  Delivering joined–up government in the UK: dimensions, issues and problems , 2002 .

[31]  G. Stoker.  Joined-up government for local and regional institutions , 2005 .

[32]  J. Gough.  Neoliberalism and Socialisation in the Contemporary City: Opposites, Complements and Instabilities , 2002 .

[33]  Peter Wilkins,et al.  Accountability and Joined-up Government , 2002 .

[34]  R. Common.  Convergence and transfer: a review of the globalisation of new public management , 1998 .

[35]  R. Rhodes.  Understanding governance : policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability , 1997 .

[36]  M. Bevir.  New Labour: A Critique , 2005 .

[37]  C. Hay.  The Political Economy Of New Labour , 1999 .

[38]  J. Percy-smith.  What Works in Strategic Partnerships for Children: A Research Review. , 2006 .

[39]  C. Hood,et al.  Joined-up government , 2005 .

[40]  Tom Christensen,et al.  The Whole-of-Government Approach – Regulation, Performance, and Public-Sector Reform , 2006 .

[41]  C. Hood,et al.  The Idea of Joined-Up Government: A Historical Perspective , 2005 .

[42]  G. Stoker.  Transforming Local Governance , 2003, Government Beyond the Centre.

[43]  Perri.  Joined-Up Government in the Western World in Comparative Perspective: A Preliminary Literature Review and Exploration , 2004 .

[44]  Geoff Mulgan,et al.  Joined-Up Government: Past, Present, and Future , 2005 .

[45]  M. Geddes.  Partnership and the Limits to Local Governance in England: Institutionalist Analysis and Neoliberalism , 2006 .

[46]  J. Davies.  LOCAL GOVERNANCE AND THE DIALECTICS OF HIERARCHY, MARKET AND NETWORK , 2005 .

[47]  J. Davies,et al.  Partnerships and Regimes: The Politics of Urban Regeneration in the UK , 2002 .

[48]  P. Lawless.  Locating and Explaining Area-Based Urban Initiatives: New Deal for Communities in England , 2004 .

[49]  B. Jessop.  Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and Urban Governance: A State‐Theoretical Perspective , 2002 .

[50]  Lucio Baccaro.  Civil society meets the state: towards associational democracy? , 2006 .

[51]  R. Rhodes.  Understanding Governance: Ten Years On , 2007 .

[52]  Paul Hoggett,et al.  Conflict, ambivalence, and the contested purpose of public organizations , 2006 .

[53]  Lawrence Pratchett,et al.  Local Government: Choice within Constraint , 2004 .