Nuclear arthrography: combined scintigraphic and radiographic procedure for diagnosis of total hip prosthesis loosening.

UNLABELLED Radiographic arthrography and bone scintigraphy are common diagnostic procedures used for evaluating total hip prostheses. In this study, both techniques are combined, and nuclear contrast imaging (nuclear arthrography) is added. The efficacy of the procedures is evaluated. METHODS After intravenous injection of 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (MDP), standard radiographic arthrography was performed in 105 patients (107 prostheses). The radiographic contrast medium was mixed with insoluble 111In-colloid (5 MBq/20 ml). After completion of the radiographic arthrography, nuclear arthrography was performed, and multiple-view dualisotope images (111In, 247-keV peak only) were recorded. Images were interpreted by superposition of the 111In image and the corresponding 99mTc-MDP image, the latter serving as a landmark for the position of the prosthesis and osseous structures. Findings at surgery were used as the gold standard. RESULTS In both cemented and uncemented acetabular and femoral components, nuclear arthrography performed better than or equal to radiographic arthrography (70%-90% and 60%-75%, respectively). Nuclear arthrography had higher diagnostic accuracy than 99mTc-MDP images alone. CONCLUSION Nuclear arthrography is a sensitive technique for detection of loosening of prostheses, offering added value over radiographic arthrography and bone scanning alone, especially for evaluation of the femoral component. Radiographic arthrography remains necessary not only for adequate deposition of contrast agents but also for detailed evaluation of osseous structures.

[1]  J. Barentsz,et al.  The use of subtraction arthrography in total hip arthroplasties. , 1986, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[2]  J. Kereiakes,et al.  A comparative study of indium-111 DTPA radionuclide and iothalamate meglumine roentgenographic arthrography in the evaluation of painful total hip arthroplasty. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  G. Bower,et al.  Radionuclide arthrography and transmission imaging for assessment of painful hip prostheses. , 1994, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  J. Tehranzadeh,et al.  Radiological evaluation of painful total hip replacement. , 1981, Radiology.

[5]  C. D. Teates,et al.  Radionuclide bone imaging as a means of differentiating loosening and infection in patients with a painful total hip prosthesis. , 1979, Radiology.

[6]  W. Capello,et al.  Comparison of radiographic and radionuclide hip arthrography in determination of femoral component loosening of hip arthroplasties. , 1985, The Hip.

[7]  H S Dobbs,et al.  Survivorship of total hip replacements. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  J. Lette,et al.  Bone imaging after cementless press fit total hip arthroplasty. , 1989, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[9]  W. Capello,et al.  Evaluation of metallic osseous implants with nuclear medicine. , 1988, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[10]  C. Resnik,et al.  Arthroscintigraphic Evaluation of the Painful Total Hip Prosthesis , 1986, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[11]  R. Wixson,et al.  Arthrography after total hip arthroplasty: a modified technique used in the diagnosis of pain. , 1983, Radiology.

[12]  R. Hendrix,et al.  Arthrographic and radiologic evaluation of prosthetic joints. , 1981, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[13]  William H. Harris,et al.  Total Hip and Total Knee Replacement , 1990 .

[14]  R. Bourne,et al.  Analysis of radionuclide arthrograms, radiographic arthrograms, and sequential plain radiographs in the assessment of painful hip arthroplasty. , 1990, The Journal of arthroplasty.