Spray droplet size and carrier volume effect on dicamba and glufosinate efficacy.

BACKGROUND Pesticide applications using a specific droplet size and carrier volume could maximize herbicide efficacy while mitigating particle drift in a precise and efficient manner. The objectives of this study were to investigate the influence of spray droplet size and carrier volume on dicamba and glufosinate efficacy, and to determine the plausibility of droplet-size based site-specific weed management strategies. RESULTS Generally, across herbicides and carrier volumes, as droplet size increased, weed control decreased. Increased carrier volume (187 L ha-1 ) buffered this droplet size effect, thus greater droplet sizes could be used to mitigate drift potential while maintaining sufficient levels of weed control. To mitigate drift potential and achieve satisfactory weed control (≥ 90% of maximum observed control), a 900 µm (Ultra Coarse) droplet size paired with 187 L ha-1 carrier volume is recommended for dicamba applications and a 605 µm (Extremely Coarse) droplet size across carrier volumes is recommended for glufosinate applications. Although general droplet size recommendations were created, optimum droplet sizes for weed control varied significantly across site-years. CONCLUSION Convoluted interactions occur between droplet size, carrier volume, and other application parameters. Recommendations for optimizing herbicide applications based on droplet size should be based on a site-specific management approach to better account for these interactions. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry.

[1]  M. C. Butler Ellis,et al.  PM—Power and Machinery: Design Factors affecting Spray Characteristics and Drift Performance of Air Induction Nozzles , 2002 .

[2]  J. Ryerse,et al.  Droplet size affects glyphosate retention, absorption, and translocation in corn , 2003, Weed Science.

[3]  G. Kruger,et al.  Effect of Nozzle Selection and Spray Volume on Droplet Size and Efficacy of Engenia Tank-Mix Combinations , 2016, Weed Technology.

[4]  E. A. Anglund,et al.  FIELD EVALUATION OF RESPONSE TIMES FOR A VARIABLE RATE (PRESSURE–BASED AND INJECTION) LIQUID CHEMICAL APPLICATORS , 2003 .

[5]  Alvin R. Womac,et al.  Spray Tip Effect on Glufosinate Canopy Deposits in Palmer Amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri ) for Pulse-Width Modulation versus Air-Induction Technologies , 2016 .

[6]  P.C.H. Miller,et al.  A simulation model of the spray drift from hydraulic nozzles , 1989 .

[7]  Joe D. Luck,et al.  Field application uniformity and accuracy of two rate control systems with automatic section capabilities on agricultural sprayers , 2013, Precision Agriculture.

[8]  G. Matthews,et al.  Pesticide Application Methods: Matthews/Pesticide Application Methods , 2014 .

[9]  D. L. Reichard,et al.  Simulation of drift of discrete sizes of water droplets from field sprayers , 1994 .

[10]  BRADFORD K. RAMSDALE,et al.  Drift-Reducing Nozzle Effects on Herbicide Performance1 , 2001, Weed Technology.

[11]  H. E. Ozkan,et al.  Droplet Size Distributions Across the Fan Patterns of New and Worn Nozzles , 1992 .

[12]  F. Hall,et al.  Effects of spray adjuvants on swath patterns and droplet spectra for a flat-fan hydraulic nozzle , 1993 .

[13]  J. R. Lake.  The effect of drop size and velocity on the performance of agricultural sprays , 1977 .

[14]  R. S. Henry,et al.  The Impact of Spray Droplet Size on the Efficacy of 2,4-D, Atrazine, Chlorimuron-Methyl, Dicamba, Glufosinate, and Saflufenacil , 2016, Weed Technology.

[15]  E. Webster,et al.  Effects of Spray Volume and Droplet Size on Herbicide Deposition and Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) Control1 , 2000, Weed Technology.

[16]  A. Womac,et al.  Characterization of the Spray Droplet Spectra and Patterns of Four Venturi-Type Drift Reduction Nozzles , 1999, Weed Technology.

[17]  R. S. Henry,et al.  Influence of Herbicide Active Ingredient, Nozzle Type, Orifice Size, Spray Pressure, and Carrier Volume Rate on Spray Droplet Size Characteristics , 2015, Weed Technology.

[18]  C. R. Tuck,et al.  The effect of some adjuvants on sprays produced by agricultural flat fan nozzles , 1997 .

[19]  Dvoralai Wulfsohn,et al.  PA—Precision Agriculture: Agricultural Sprays in Cross-flow and Drift , 2001 .

[20]  John P. Fulton,et al.  Real-time nozzle flow uniformity when using automatic section control on agricultural sprayers , 2011 .

[21]  Greg R. Kruger,et al.  Performance of Postemergence Herbicides Applied at Different Carrier Volume Rates , 2015, Weed Technology.

[22]  Robert D. Grisso,et al.  The Cost of Misapplication of Herbicides , 1989 .

[23]  M. Knoche.  Effect of droplet size and carrier volume on performance of foliage-applied herbicides , 1994 .

[24]  J. P. Cunha,et al.  Assessment of spray drift from pesticide applications in soybean crops. , 2017 .

[25]  Alvin R. Womac,et al.  Spray Tip Configurations with Pulse-Width Modulation for Glufosinate-Ammonium Deposits in Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) , 2017 .

[26]  W. G. Johnson,et al.  Herbicide coverage in narrow row soybean as influenced by spray nozzle design and carrier volume , 2016 .

[27]  Joe D. Luck,et al.  Analyzing the Nozzle Spray Fan Pattern of an Agricultural Sprayer Using Pulse Width Modulation Technology to Generate an On-Ground Coverage Map , 2017 .

[28]  J. B. Byass,et al.  Spray drift from a tractor-powered field sprayer† , 1977 .

[29]  David Nuyttens,et al.  Effect of nozzle type, size and pressure on spray droplet characteristics , 2007 .

[30]  ANDREW J. PRICE,et al.  Evaluating the Potential for Site-Specific Herbicide Application in Soybean1 , 2004, Weed Technology.

[31]  C. Messersmith,et al.  Nozzle, Spray Volume, and Adjuvant Effects on Carfentrazone and Imazamox Efficacy1 , 2001, Weed Technology.

[32]  K. S. Mckinlay,et al.  Droplet Size and Phytotoxicity of Herbicides , 1972, Weed Science.

[33]  W. G. Johnson,et al.  Glufosinate Efficacy as Influenced by Carrier Water pH, Hardness, Foliar Fertilizer, and Ammonium Sulfate , 2016, Weed Technology.

[34]  Peter Hobson,et al.  Spray Drift from Hydraulic Spray Nozzles: the Use of a Computer Simulation Model to Examine Factors Influencing Drift , 1993 .

[35]  W. Taylor,et al.  Effect of the form of a deposit on the activity of barban applied to Avena fatua L. , 1974 .

[36]  Santosh K. Pitla,et al.  A CASE STUDY CONCERNING THE EFFECTS OF CONTROLLER RESPONSE AND TURNING MOVEMENTS ON APPLICATION RATE UNIFORMITY WITH A SELF―PROPELLED SPRAYER , 2011 .

[37]  R. E. Williamson,et al.  Influence of Droplet Size on Effectiveness of Low-Volume Herbicidal Sprays , 1963 .

[38]  L. Tian,et al.  Evaluation of a flow control system for site-specific herbicide applications , 1999 .

[39]  Mandy D. Bish,et al.  Survey of Missouri Pesticide Applicator Practices, Knowledge, and Perceptions , 2017, Weed Technology.

[40]  T. C. Mueller,et al.  Effect of Venturi-Type Nozzles and Application Volume on Postemergence Herbicide Efficacy1 , 2001, Weed Technology.

[41]  John F. Reid,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A PRECISION SPRAYER FOR SITE-SPECIFIC WEED MANAGEMENT , 1999 .