Spatial variation and prediction of forest biomass in a heterogeneous landscape

Large areas assessments of forest biomass distribution are a challenge in heterogeneous landscapes, where variations in tree growth and species composition occur over short distances. In this study, we use statistical and geospatial modeling on densely sampled forest biomass data to analyze the relative importance of ecological and physiographic variables as determinants of spatial variation of forest biomass in the environmentally heterogeneous region of the Big Sur, California. We estimated biomass in 280 forest plots (one plot per 2.85 km2) and measured an array of ecological (vegetation community type, distance to edge, amount of surrounding non-forest vegetation, soil properties, fire history) and physiographic drivers (elevation, potential soil moisture and solar radiation, proximity to the coast) of tree growth at each plot location. Our geostatistical analyses revealed that biomass distribution is spatially structured and autocorrelated up to 3.1 km. Regression tree (RT) models showed that both physiographic and ecological factors influenced biomass distribution. Across randomly selected sample densities (sample size 112 to 280), ecological effects of vegetation community type and distance to forest edge, and physiographic effects of elevation, potential soil moisture and solar radiation were the most consistent predictors of biomass. Topographic moisture index and potential solar radiation had a positive effect on biomass, indicating the importance of topographicallymediated energy and moisture on plant growth and biomass accumulation. RT model explained 35% of the variation in biomass and spatially autocorrelated variation were retained in regession residuals. Regression kriging model, developed from RT combined with kriging of regression residuals, was used to map biomass across the Big Sur. This study demonstrates how statistical and geospatial modeling can be used to discriminate the relative importance of physiographic and ecologic effects on forest biomass and develop spatial models to predict and map biomass distribution across a heterogeneous landscape.

[1]  M. D. Nelson,et al.  Mapping U.S. forest biomass using nationwide forest inventory data and moderate resolution information , 2008 .

[2]  H. Poulos.  Mapping fuels in the Chihuahuan Desert borderlands using remote sensing, geographic information systems, and biophysical modeling , 2009 .

[3]  Frank W. Davis,et al.  VEGETATION DYNAMICS, FIRE, AND THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT IN COASTAL CENTRAL CALIFORNIA' , 1993 .

[4]  R. Moss,et al.  Climate change 1995 - impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change : scientific-technical analyses , 1997 .

[5]  I. Moore,et al.  Digital terrain modelling: A review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications , 1991 .

[6]  R. Houghton.  The annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use 1850–1990* , 1999 .

[7]  R. Mickler,et al.  Regional estimation of current and future forest biomass. , 2002, Environmental pollution.

[8]  S. Grunwald,et al.  Regional hybrid geospatial modeling of soil nitrate–nitrogen in the Santa Fe River Watershed , 2006 .

[9]  David B. Clark,et al.  Landscape-scale variation in forest structure and biomass in a tropical rain forest , 2000 .

[10]  Ted S. Vinson,et al.  Forest sector carbon offset projects: Near-term opportunities to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions , 1993 .

[11]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Ecosystem Function in Heterogeneous Landscapes , 2005 .

[12]  G. Marland,et al.  The role of forest and bioenergy strategies in the global carbon cycle , 1996 .

[13]  R. Birdsey,et al.  National-Scale Biomass Estimators for United States Tree Species , 2003, Forest Science.

[14]  Sandra A. Brown,et al.  Spatial distribution of biomass in forests of the eastern USA , 1999 .

[15]  Sandra A. Brown.  Measuring carbon in forests: current status and future challenges. , 2002, Environmental pollution.

[16]  S. Nilsson,et al.  Management of forests for mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions , 1996 .

[17]  R. Houghton,et al.  Aboveground Forest Biomass and the Global Carbon Balance , 2005 .

[18]  G. Mroz,et al.  Microclimate in Forest Ecosystem and Landscape Ecology , 1999 .

[19]  David M. Rizzo,et al.  Establishment of an emerging generalist pathogen in redwood forest communities , 2005 .

[20]  R. Dubayah.  Modeling a solar radiation topoclimatology for the Rio Grande River Basin , 1994 .

[21]  R. Meentemeyer,et al.  Distribution of plant life history types in California chaparral: the role of topographically‐determined drought severity , 2002 .

[22]  Sassan Saatchi,et al.  Mapping landscape scale variations of forest structure, biomass, and productivity in Amazonia , 2009 .

[23]  F. Bravo,et al.  Studying within-stand structure and dynamics with geostatistical and molecular marker tools , 2004 .

[24]  G. Moisen,et al.  Evaluating Kriging as a Tool to Improve Moderate Resolution Maps of Forest Biomass , 2007, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[25]  Timothy G. Gregoire,et al.  Sampling Methods for Multiresource Forest Inventory , 1993 .

[26]  T. Spies,et al.  Influence of environment, disturbance, and ownership on forest vegetation of coastal Oregon. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[27]  F. Davis,et al.  Pre-impact forest composition and ongoing tree mortality associated with sudden oak death in the Big Sur region; California. , 2010 .

[28]  Sassan Saatchi,et al.  Estimation of Forest Fuel Load From Radar Remote Sensing , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[29]  M. Ashton,et al.  Effects of habitat fragmentation on the buffering capacity of edge environments in a seasonally dry tropical oak forest ecosystem in Oaxaca, Mexico , 2004 .

[30]  R. Meentemeyer,et al.  Impact of sudden oak death on tree mortality in the Big Sur ecoregion of California , 2008, Biological Invasions.

[31]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Forest biomass estimation over regional scales using multisource data , 2004 .

[32]  George H. Taylor,et al.  High-quality spatial climate data sets for the United States and beyond , 2000 .

[33]  J. Navar,et al.  Allometric equations for tree species and carbon stocks for forests of northwestern Mexico , 2009 .

[34]  G. De’ath,et al.  CLASSIFICATION AND REGRESSION TREES: A POWERFUL YET SIMPLE TECHNIQUE FOR ECOLOGICAL DATA ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[35]  P. Henson,et al.  The natural history of Big Sur , 1993 .

[36]  Pierre Goovaerts,et al.  Geostatistical modelling of uncertainty in soil science , 2001 .

[37]  Phaedon C. Kyriakidis,et al.  Improving spatial distribution estimation of forest biomass with geostatistics: A case study for Rondônia, Brazil , 2007 .

[38]  K. P. Overmarsa,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation in multi-scale land use models , 2003 .

[39]  P. Legendre.  Spatial Autocorrelation: Trouble or New Paradigm? , 1993 .

[40]  W. Klaassen,et al.  Increased heat fluxes near a forest edge , 2002 .

[41]  M. Ashton,et al.  Measuring Carbon in Forests , 2012 .

[42]  Hong S. He,et al.  Simulating forest fuel and fire risk dynamics across landscapes—LANDIS fuel module design , 2004 .

[43]  T. Vanwalleghem,et al.  Predicting Forest Microclimate in Heterogeneous Landscapes , 2009, Ecosystems.

[44]  Michael J. Oimoen,et al.  The National Elevation Dataset , 2002 .

[45]  Roland W Scholz,et al.  Decision making under uncertainty in case of soil remediation. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[46]  R. Reese.  Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists , 2001 .

[47]  G. Heuvelink,et al.  A generic framework for spatial prediction of soil variables based on regression-kriging , 2004 .

[48]  W. B. Smith,et al.  Forest inventory and analysis: a national inventory and monitoring program. , 2002, Environmental pollution.

[49]  M. Madden,et al.  Large area forest inventory using Landsat ETM+: A geostatistical approach , 2009 .

[50]  Dean L. Urban,et al.  Spatially varying rules of landscape change: lessons from a case study , 2006 .

[51]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[52]  G. Wang,et al.  Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in the South Carolina Piedmont between 1936 and 2005 , 2008 .

[53]  Kim Lowell,et al.  Forest attributes and spatial autocorrelation and interpolation: effects of alternative sampling schemata in the boreal forest , 1997 .

[54]  H. Poulos,et al.  A hierarchical approach for scaling forest inventory and fuels data from local to landscape scales in the Davis Mountains, Texas, USA , 2007 .

[55]  R. Olea.  Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation By Pierre Goovaerts, Oxford University Press, Applied Geostatistics Series, 1997, 483 p., hardcover, $65 (U.S.), ISBN 0-19-511538-4 , 1999 .

[56]  William F. Laurance,et al.  Influence of landscape heterogeneity on spatial patterns of wood productivity, wood specific density and above ground biomass in Amazonia , 2009 .