Investigating the success of operational business process management systems

Business process management systems (BPMS) belong to a class of enterprise information systems that are characterized by the dependence on explicitly modeled process logic. Through the process logic, it is relatively easy to manage explicitly the routing and allocation of work items along a business process through the system. Inspired by the DeLone and McLean framework, we theorize that these process-aware system features are important attributes of system quality, which in turn will elevate key user evaluations such as perceived usefulness, and usage satisfaction. We examine this theoretical model using data collected from four different, mostly mature BPM system projects. Our findings validate the importance of input quality as well as allocation and routing attributes as antecedents of system quality, which, in turn, determines both usefulness and satisfaction with the system. We further demonstrate how service quality and workflow dependency are significant precursors to perceived usefulness. Our results suggest the appropriateness of a multi-dimensional conception of system quality for future research, and provide important design-oriented advice for the design and configuration of BPMSs.

[1]  Hsiu-Fen Lin,et al.  Measuring Online Learning Systems Success: Applying the Updated DeLone and McLean Model , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[2]  Fabio Casati,et al.  Workflow Evolution , 1996, ER.

[3]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[4]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Process descriptions as organisational accounting devices: the dual use of workflow technologies , 2001, GROUP.

[5]  Barbara H Wixom,et al.  A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  Manfred Reichert,et al.  Adeptflex—Supporting Dynamic Changes of Workflows Without Losing Control , 1998, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems.

[7]  William J. Doll,et al.  A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument , 1994, MIS Q..

[8]  Gianpaolo Cugola,et al.  Tolerating Deviations in Process Support Systems via Flexible Enactment of Process Models , 1998, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[9]  Blake Ives,et al.  The measurement of user information satisfaction , 1983, CACM.

[10]  Arun Rai,et al.  Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  Mo Adam Mahmood,et al.  Variables affecting information technology end-user satisfaction: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[12]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Measuring e-Commerce Success: Applying the DeLone & McLean Information Systems Success Model , 2004, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[13]  Ronald T. Cenfetelli,et al.  Identifying and Testing the Inhibitors of Technology Usage Intentions , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  Thomas J. Housel,et al.  Measuring and Managing Knowledge , 2001 .

[15]  Wynne W. Chin Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[16]  Thomas J. Housel,et al.  Measuring the Return on Information Technology: A Knowledge-Based Approach for Revenue Allocation at the Process and Firm Level , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Peter Gyngell,et al.  Process Innovation: Reengineering Work through Information Technology , 1994 .

[18]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Gender and age differences in employee decisions about new technology: an extension to the theory of planned behavior , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[19]  Ing-Long Wu,et al.  A hybrid technology acceptance approach for exploring e-CRM adoption in organizations , 2005, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[20]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[21]  Boudewijn F. van Dongen,et al.  Business process mining: An industrial application , 2007, Inf. Syst..

[22]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness , 1993 .

[23]  Ronald Batenburg,et al.  Do users go with the new workflow? from user participation to quality of work during wfm deployment , 2009, ECIS.

[24]  D. Straub,et al.  Editor's comments: a critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly , 2012 .

[25]  Victor R. Prybutok,et al.  Examining the Merits of Usefulness Versus Use in an Information Service Quality and Information System Success Web-Based Model , 2008, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[26]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  Survey Research Methodology in Management Information Systems: An Assessment , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Rudolf R. Sinkovics,et al.  The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing , 2009 .

[28]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution , 1995 .

[29]  Hongyan Ma,et al.  Process-aware information systems: Bridging people and software through process technology , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[30]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[31]  Frank Leymann,et al.  Web services and business process management , 2002, IBM Syst. J..

[32]  Mathias Weske,et al.  Case handling: a new paradigm for business process support , 2005, Data Knowl. Eng..

[33]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research , 2007, MIS Q..

[35]  Dale L. Goodhue,et al.  Development and Measurement Validity of a Task-Technology Fit Instrument for User Evaluations of Inf , 1998 .

[36]  Kees M. van Hee,et al.  Workflow Management: Models, Methods, and Systems , 2002, Cooperative information systems.

[37]  Clarence A. Ellis,et al.  ML-DEWS: Modeling Language to Support Dynamic Evolution within Workflow Systems , 2000, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[38]  Claus Hagen,et al.  The fruits of Business Process Management: an experience report from a Swiss bank , 2007, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[39]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .

[40]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Peter B. Seddon A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[42]  Darshana Sedera,et al.  Re-conceptualizing Information System Success: The IS-Impact Measurement Model , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Barbara Pernici,et al.  Database Support for Workflow Management: The WIDE Project , 2012 .

[44]  Giorgio De Michelis,et al.  A Light Workflow Management System Using Simple Process Models , 2000, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[45]  Barbara Wixom,et al.  Antecedents of Information and System Quality: An Empirical Examination Within the Context of Data Warehousing , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Shouhong Wang,et al.  The Implementation of Business Process Reengineering , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Judy A. Siguaw,et al.  Formative versus Reflective Indicators in Organizational Measure Development: A Comparison and Empirical Illustration , 2006 .

[48]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  Assessing eGovernment systems success: A validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[49]  Dimitris Karagiannis,et al.  BPMS: business process management systems , 1995, SIGO.

[50]  Stefan Jablonski,et al.  A comprehensive approach to flexibility in workflow management systems , 1999, WACC '99.

[51]  John Bowers,et al.  Workflow From Within and Without: Technology and Cooperative Work on the Print Industry Shopfloor , 1995, ECSCW.

[52]  Manfred Reichert,et al.  Beyond rigidity - dynamic process lifecycle support : A Survey on dynamic changes in process-aware information systems (Special Issue Paper) , 2009 .

[53]  Megan Seen,et al.  Explaining and Predicting Information Systems Acceptance and Success: An Integrative Model , 2007, ECIS.

[54]  Doherty,et al.  The Cultural Impact of Workflow Management Systems in the Financial Services Sector , 2001 .

[55]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  ORGANIZATIONS: A MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE , 2007 .

[56]  Hajo A. Reijers,et al.  Business process management: Attempted concepticide? , 2004 .

[57]  Hajo A. Reijers,et al.  Re-Configuring Workflow Management Systems to Facilitate a "smooth Flow of Work" , 2007, Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst..

[58]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  An overview of workflow management: From process modeling to workflow automation infrastructure , 1995, Distributed and Parallel Databases.

[59]  Christoph Bussler,et al.  Workflow Management: Modeling Concepts, Architecture and Implementation , 1996 .

[60]  Manfred Reichert,et al.  Beyond rigidity – dynamic process lifecycle support , 2009, Computer Science - Research and Development.

[61]  Jen-Her Wu,et al.  An organizational memory information systems success model: an extension of DeLone and McLean's I/S success model , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.