Measuring Performance of Knowledge-Intensive Workgroups through Social Networks

In this article, we examine the effect of social network position, structure, and ties on the performance of knowledge-intensive workers in dispersed occupational communities. Using structural holes and strength-of-tie theory, we develop a theoretical framework and a valid and reliable survey instrument. Second, we apply network and structural holes measures for understanding its association with performance. Empirical results suggest that degree centrality in a knowledge workers’ professional network positively influences performance use, whereas a highly constrained professional network is detrimental to performance. The findings show that social network structure and position are important factors to consider for individual performance.

[1]  James N. Baron,et al.  Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace , 1997 .

[2]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams , 2001 .

[3]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  Daniel J. Brass Technology and the structuring of jobs: Employee satisfaction, performance, and influence , 1985 .

[5]  W. Borman,et al.  Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance , 1993 .

[6]  Edward Muzio,et al.  Soft Skills Quantification (SSQ) Foi Project Manager Competencies , 2007 .

[7]  Harold Guetzkow,et al.  The Impact of Certain Communication Nets Upon Organization and Performance in Task-Oriented Groups , 1955 .

[8]  E. Aries,et al.  Men and Women in Interaction: Reconsidering the Differences , 1996 .

[9]  E. Salas,et al.  Effects of communication network structure: Components of positional centrality , 1991 .

[10]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitudes toward objects as predictors of sin-gle and multiple behavioral criteria , 1974 .

[11]  E. Higgins,et al.  Handbook of motivation and cognition : foundations of social behavior , 1991 .

[12]  P. Killworth,et al.  The Problem of Informant Accuracy: The Validity of Retrospective Data , 1984 .

[13]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  A. W. Wicker Attitudes Versus Actions: The Relationship of Verbal and Overt Behavioral Responses to Attitude Objects. , 1969 .

[15]  K. S. Chung Understanding Attitudes towards Performance in Knowledge-intensive Work: The Influence of Social Networks and ICT Use , 2009 .

[16]  E. Rosenthal,et al.  Social networks and team performance , 1997 .

[17]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Defining and measuring quality of care: a perspective from US researchers. , 2000, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[18]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[19]  Mark S. Granovetter T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[20]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Measuring Tie Strength , 1984 .

[21]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  The geography of coordination: dealing with distance in R&D work , 1999, GROUP.

[22]  Robert Fletcher,et al.  Systematic Review: The Relationship between Clinical Experience and Quality of Health Care , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[23]  Kon Shing Kenneth Chung,et al.  Actor centrality correlates to project based coordination , 2006, CSCW '06.

[24]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[25]  H.J. Thamhain,et al.  Team Leadership Effectiveness in Technology-Based Project Environments , 2004, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[26]  M. Roland,et al.  Defining quality of care. , 2000, Social science & medicine.

[27]  Alex Bavelas,et al.  Communication Patterns in Task‐Oriented Groups , 1950 .

[28]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  Investigating the interplay between structure and information and communications technology in the real estate industry , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.

[29]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance , 1992 .

[30]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-Analysis , 1990 .

[31]  Robin M. Hogarth,et al.  The Social Capital of French and American Managers , 2000 .

[32]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[33]  Tonya M. Peterson,et al.  Motivation: How to Increase Project Team Performance , 2007 .

[34]  Patricia E. Tweet Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital , 2006 .

[35]  J. Humphreys,et al.  A modified framework for rural general practice: the importance of recruitment and retention. , 1998, Social science & medicine.

[36]  C. Kiesler The psychology of commitment : experiments linking behavior to belief , 1971 .

[37]  Harold Guetzkow,et al.  Factors in the Organizational Development of Task-Oriented Groups , 1957 .

[38]  L. Sproull,et al.  Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams , 2000 .

[39]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[40]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Tie and Network Correlates of Individual Performance in Knowledge-Intensive Work , 2004 .

[41]  L. Freeman,et al.  Cognitive Structure and Informant Accuracy , 1987 .

[42]  R. Burt Secondhand Brokerage: Evidence On The Importance Of Local Structure For Managers, Bankers, And Analysts , 2007 .

[43]  R. Cattell The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors. , 1966, Multivariate behavioral research.

[44]  Margaret Tan,et al.  The consequences of information technology acceptance on subsequent individual performance , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[45]  M. Gurevitch,et al.  The social structure of acquaintanceship networks , 1961 .

[46]  M. Allen,et al.  Sex differences in self-disclosure: a meta-analysis. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  The Dynamics of Organizational Proximity , 1985 .

[48]  Dov Dvir,et al.  Projects and Project Managers: The Relationship between Project Managers' Personality, Project Types, and Project Success , 2006 .

[49]  Disentangling direct and indirect gender effects on the supportive network , 1990 .

[50]  R. Sanson-Fisher,et al.  Measuring general practitioners' attitudes towards medical care. , 1987, Family practice.

[51]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[52]  R. Burt Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[53]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[54]  M. Hammer,et al.  Explorations into the meaning of social network interview data , 1984 .

[55]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  Social Networks and the Performance of Individuals and Groups , 2001 .

[56]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[57]  Judith A. Hall Nonverbal sex differences : communication accuracy and expressive style , 1984 .

[58]  Yutaka Aoki,et al.  Physician gender effects in medical communication: a meta-analytic review. , 2002, JAMA.

[59]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Individual Centrality and Performance in Virtual R&D Groups: An Empirical Study , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[60]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[61]  L. Freeman,et al.  Centrality in social networks: ii. experimental results☆ , 1979 .

[62]  R. Hanneman Introduction to Social Network Methods , 2001 .

[63]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  A Partial Test of the Social Information Processing Model of Job Attitudes , 1980 .

[64]  J. Teachman Analysis of Population Diversity , 1980 .

[65]  H. Leavitt Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. , 1951, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[66]  Daniel J. Brass Structural Relationships, Job Characteristics, and Worker Satisfaction and Performance. , 1981 .

[67]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[68]  M. Mellow The Work of Rural Professionals: Doing the Gemeinschaft‐Gesellschaft Gavotte , 2005 .

[69]  C. Weisman,et al.  Women and health care communication. , 1989, Patient education and counseling.

[70]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. , 1978, Administrative science quarterly.

[71]  Katherine Faust Centrality in affiliation networks , 1997 .

[72]  Robert L. Burgess,et al.  Communication Networks and Behavioral Consequences! , 1969 .

[73]  D. Krackhardt The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations , 2003 .

[74]  G. Labianca,et al.  Group Social Capital and Group Effectiveness: The Role of Informal Socializing Ties , 2004 .

[75]  R. Fazio How do attitudes guide behavior , 1986 .

[76]  Ajay Mehra,et al.  The Social Networks of High and Low Self-Monitors: Implications for Workplace Performance , 2001 .

[77]  J. Rodney Turner,et al.  The Project Manager's Leadership Style as a Success Factor on Projects: A Literature Review , 2005 .

[78]  James William Coleman,et al.  Competition and the Structure of Industrial Society: Reply to Braithwaite , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[79]  Phillip Bonacich,et al.  Simultaneous group and individual centralities , 1991 .

[80]  L. Verbrugge,et al.  Physician Treatment of Men and Women Patients: Sex Bias or Appropriate Care? , 1981, Medical care.

[81]  Jonathon N. Cummings Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization , 2004, Manag. Sci..