A land-use and land-cover modeling strategy to support a national assessment of carbon stocks and fluxes

Abstract Changes in land use, land cover, disturbance regimes, and land management have considerable influence on carbon and greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes within ecosystems. Through targeted land-use and land-management activities, ecosystems can be managed to enhance carbon sequestration and mitigate fluxes of other GHGs. National-scale, comprehensive analyses of carbon sequestration potential by ecosystem are needed, with a consistent, nationally applicable land-use and land-cover (LULC) modeling framework a key component of such analyses. The U.S. Geological Survey has initiated a project to analyze current and projected future GHG fluxes by ecosystem and quantify potential mitigation strategies. We have developed a unique LULC modeling framework to support this work. Downscaled scenarios consistent with IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES) were constructed for U.S. ecoregions, and the FORE-SCE model was used to spatially map the scenarios. Results for a prototype demonstrate our ability to model LULC change and inform a biogeochemical modeling framework for analysis of subsequent GHG fluxes. The methodology was then successfully used to model LULC change for four IPCC SRES scenarios for an ecoregion in the Great Plains. The scenario-based LULC projections are now being used to analyze potential GHG impacts of LULC change across the U.S.

[1]  H. Tian,et al.  China's terrestrial carbon balance: Contributions from multiple global change factors , 2011 .

[2]  W. Parton,et al.  Analysis of factors controlling soil organic matter levels in Great Plains grasslands , 1987 .

[3]  C. Field,et al.  Temporal evolution of the European forest sector carbon sink from 1950 to 1999 , 2003 .

[4]  E. Lambin,et al.  The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Peter H. Verburg,et al.  Future carbon sequestration in Europe—Effects of land use change , 2008 .

[6]  T. Loveland,et al.  The characteristics and interpretability of land surface change and implications for project design , 2004 .

[7]  Chengquan Huang,et al.  Assessing rates of forest change and fragmentation in Alabama, USA, using the vegetation change tracker model , 2009 .

[8]  Stephen V. Stehman,et al.  A Strategy for Estimating the Rates of Recent United States Land-Cover Changes , 2002 .

[9]  Shuguang Liu,et al.  Ignoring detailed fast-changing dynamics of land use overestimates regional terrestrial carbon sequestration. , 2009 .

[10]  R. G. Pontius.  Statistical Methods to Partition Effects of Quantity and Location During Comparison of Categorical Maps at Multiple Resolutions , 2002 .

[11]  Michael E. Chang,et al.  ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION STRATEGIES FOR RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT , 2005 .

[12]  Mnv,et al.  The IMAGE 2.2 implementation of the SRES scenarios; A comprehensive analysis of emissions, climate change and impacts in the 21st century , 2001 .

[13]  Stephen V. Stehman,et al.  Detecting trends in landscape pattern metrics over a 20-year period using a sampling-based monitoring programme , 2003 .

[14]  F. Wagner,et al.  Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry , 2003 .

[15]  K. Paustian,et al.  GRASSLAND MANAGEMENT AND CONVERSION INTO GRASSLAND: EFFECTS ON SOIL CARBON , 2001 .

[16]  David S. Powlson,et al.  Meeting Europe's climate change commitments: quantitative estimates of the potential for carbon mitigation by agriculture , 2000 .

[17]  M. Rollins,et al.  The LANDFIRE prototype project: Nationally consistent and locally relevant geospatial data for wildland fire management , 2006 .

[18]  C. Wiedinmyer,et al.  Prescribed fire as a means of reducing forest carbon emissions in the western United States. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  J. Fry,et al.  Updating the 2001 National Land Cover Database land cover classification to 2006 by using Landsat imagery change detection methods , 2009 .

[20]  Sharon W. Woudenberg,et al.  The Forest Inventory and Analysis Database: Database Description and Users Manual Version 4.0 for Phase 2 , 2012 .

[21]  Robert Gilmore Pontius,et al.  Uncertainty in the difference between maps of future land change scenarios , 2009 .

[22]  Limin Yang,et al.  COMPLETION OF THE 1990S NATIONAL LAND COVER DATA SET FOR THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES FROM LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER DATA AND ANCILLARY DATA SOURCES , 2001 .

[23]  B. Eickhout,et al.  A multi-scale, multi-model approach for analyzing the future dynamics of European land use , 2008 .

[24]  Roger F. Auch,et al.  Scenarios of land use and land cover change in the conterminous United States: Utilizing the special report on emission scenarios at ecoregional scales , 2012 .

[25]  Thomas R. Loveland,et al.  Contemporary Carbon Dynamics in Terrestrial Ecosystems in the Southeastern Plains of the United States , 2004 .

[26]  Shuguang Liu,et al.  Modeling carbon dynamics in vegetation and soil under the impact of soil erosion and deposition , 2003 .

[27]  Peter H. Verburg,et al.  Simulation of changes in the spatial pattern of land use in China , 1999 .

[28]  Terry L Sohl,et al.  Using an Ecoregion Framework to Analyze Land-Cover and Land-Use Dynamics , 2004, Environmental management.

[29]  J. Wickham,et al.  Completion of the 2001 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States , 2007 .

[30]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) , 2013 .

[31]  Richard Bernknopf,et al.  A method for assessing carbon stocks, carbon sequestration, and greenhouse-gas fluxes in ecosystems of the United States under present conditions and future scenarios , 2010 .

[32]  S. Goward,et al.  An automated approach for reconstructing recent forest disturbance history using dense Landsat time series stacks , 2010 .

[33]  Christopher A. Barnes,et al.  Completion of the 2006 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States. , 2011 .

[34]  Eric Koomen,et al.  Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change , 2008 .

[35]  Zhengpeng Li,et al.  A spatial resolution threshold of land cover in estimating terrestrial carbon sequestration in four counties in Georgia and Alabama, USA , 2010 .

[36]  G. Richards,et al.  Development of a carbon accounting model (FullCAM Vers. 1.0) for the Australian continent , 2004 .

[37]  David Neil Bird,et al.  Integration of albedo effects caused by land use change into the climate balance: Should we still account in greenhouse gas units? , 2010, Forest Ecology and Management.

[38]  J. Omernik.  Ecoregions of the Conterminous United States , 1987 .

[39]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories , 2006 .

[40]  T. Sohl,et al.  Using the FORE-SCE model to project land-cover change in the southeastern United States , 2008 .

[41]  Rattan Lal,et al.  SOIL CARBON SEQUESTRATION TO MITIGATE CLIMATE CHANGE AND ADVANCE FOOD SECURITY , 2007 .

[42]  C. Potter,et al.  Satellite-derived estimates of potential carbon sequestration through afforestation of agricultural lands in the United States , 2007 .

[43]  Thomas R. Loveland,et al.  Addressing foundational elements of regional land-use change forecasting , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[44]  G. P. Zimmerman,et al.  The first state of the carbon cycle report (SOCCR): The North American carbon budget and implications for the global carbon cycle. , 2007 .

[45]  T. Loveland,et al.  The FORE-SCE model: a practical approach for projecting land cover change using scenario-based modeling , 2007 .