Measuring contrast sensitivity with inappropriate optical correction*

Spatial frequency‐selective minima (notches) in the contrast sensitivity function (CSF) because of defocus can mimic those that occur with ocular disease. We examined the influence of measurement conditions on CSF shape in simulated clinical testing. CSF notches occurred with almost all levels of defocus for all subjects. Multiple notches were found under some conditions. Notches were found with defocus as small as 0.50 D. Effects of induced astigmatism depended on the orientation of the target. Notches were apparent in defocus conditions after stimulus size and room illuminance were modified and when subjects had insufficient accommodation to compensate for hypermetropic defocus. The equivalent of notches was not noted with the Pelli‐Robson chart. As defocus‐induced CSF notches may be mistaken for functional loss, careful refractive correction should be conducted prior to clinical or experimental CSF measurement, even at low spatial frequencies.

[1]  A. Bradley,et al.  Consequences of Monocular Diplopia for the Contrast Sensitivity Function , 1996, Vision Research.

[2]  F. W. Campbell,et al.  Effect of Focus on the Visual Response to a Sinusoidally Modulated Spatial Stimulus , 1965 .

[3]  R. Woods,et al.  Screening for ophthalmic disease in older subjects using visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. , 1998, Ophthalmology.

[4]  Charman Wn.  Effect of refractive error in visual tests with sinusoidal gratings. , 1979 .

[5]  M. Rosenfield,et al.  Repeatability of Subjective and Objective Refraction , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[6]  A Bradley,et al.  Effects of Spherical and Astigmatic Defocus on Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity: A Comparison of Three Clinical Charts , 1991, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[7]  M F Marmor,et al.  Effect of visual blur on contrast sensitivity. Clinical implications. , 1988, Ophthalmology.

[8]  R. Woods.  Reliability of visual performance measurement under optical degradation , 1993, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[9]  R. Hess,et al.  Contrast attenuation characteristics of iris clipped intraocular lens implants in situ. , 1985, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  R. Hess,et al.  The functional area for summation to threshold for sinusoidal gratings , 1978, Vision Research.

[11]  D B Elliott,et al.  The reliability of the Pelli‐Robson contrast sensitivity chart , 1990, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[12]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  THE DESIGN OF A NEW LETTER CHART FOR MEASURING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY , 1988 .

[13]  R L Woods,et al.  Spatial frequency dependent observer bias in the measurement of contrast sensitivity. , 1996, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[14]  M. Yap,et al.  CONTRAST SENSITIVITY IN PSEUDOPHAKIA AND APHAKIA , 1986, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[15]  L G Carney,et al.  Visual loss in keratoconus. , 1982, Archives of ophthalmology.

[16]  H. H. Hopkins.  The frequency response of a defocused optical system , 1955, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[17]  A Bradley,et al.  A comparison of clinical acuity and contrast sensitivity charts: effect of uncorrected myopia , 1991, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[18]  D A Atchison,et al.  Effects of defocus and pupil size on human contrast sensitivity , 1999, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[19]  R E Fusaro,et al.  The Repeatability of Automated and Clinician Refraction , 1998, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[20]  G E McCaghrey,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a range of autorefractors , 1993, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[21]  D A Atchison,et al.  Predicting the effects of optical defocus on human contrast sensitivity. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[22]  D. Whitaker,et al.  Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects. , 1994, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[23]  L. Bour,et al.  Segmented refraction of the crystalline lens as a prerequisite for the occurrence of monocular polyplopia, increased depth of focus, and contrast sensitivity function notches , 1994 .

[24]  K. Alexander,et al.  Spatial-frequency characteristics of letter identification. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[25]  J. Morrison,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE INVESTIGATION INTO THE EFFECTS OF PUPIL DIAMETER AND DEFOCUS ON CONTRAST SENSITIVITY FOR AN EXTENDED RANGE OF SPATIAL FREQUENCIES IN NATURAL AND HOMATROPINIZED EYES , 1987, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[26]  Lo J. Bour,et al.  Selective broad-band spatial frequency loss in contrast sensitivity functions. Comparison with a model based on optical transfer functions. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[27]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood , 1982, Vision Research.

[28]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  The visual filter mediating letter identification , 1994, Nature.

[29]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Origin of notches in CSF: optical or neural? , 1987, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[30]  W N Charman,et al.  Fluctuations in accommodation: a review , 1988, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[31]  D. P. Andrews,et al.  APE: Adaptive probit estimation of psychometric functions , 1981 .

[32]  G B Arden,et al.  A simple grating test for contrast sensitivity: preliminary results indicate value in screening for glaucoma. , 1978, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[33]  D. G. Green,et al.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.