Further study on efficiency of sequential approximate programming for probabilistic structural design optimization

Compared to the traditional deterministic optimization based on safety factors, the probabilistic structural design optimization (PSDO) is considered to be a more rational design philosophy because of reasonable account of uncertainties in material properties, loading, boundary condition and geometry, and even mathematical representation of the system model. However, it is well known that the computation for PSDO can be prohibitive when the associated function evaluation is expensive. As a result, many approximate PSDO methods have been developed in recent literatures. In previous works, we developed two sequential approximate programming (SAP) strategies for PSDO based on reliability index approach (RIA) and performance measure approach (PMA). In PMA with SAP, a sequence of approximate programming of PSDO was formulated and solved before the final optimum was located. In each subprogramming, rather than relying on direct linear Taylor expansion of the probabilistic performance measure (PPM), we developed a formulation for approximate PPM at the current design point and used its linearization instead. The approximate PPM and its sensitivity were obtained by approximating the optimality conditions in the vicinity of the minimum performance target point (MPTP). The present paper further elaborates the SAP for PMA. In addition to detailed description of the algorithm, we present error analysis and show that in the ɛ-vicinity of optimum design and corresponding MPTP, the difference between the Taylor expansion of PPM and the linear expansion of approximate PPM is of higher order of ɛ. Four examples are optimized by six algorithms appearing in recent literatures for efficiency comparison. The effect of target reliability index and statistical distribution of random variables on the comparison is discussed. The third example shows that PMA with SAP performs well even for the problem for which reliability index calculation by first order reliability method (FORM) fails. Finally, the fourth example with 144 probabilistic constraints is shown to demonstrate the effectiveness of PMA with SAP. All example results illustrate that with the algorithm PMA with SAP, we get concurrent convergence of both design optimization and probabilistic performance measure calculation, which agrees well with the error analysis.

[1]  A. M. Hasofer,et al.  Exact and Invariant Second-Moment Code Format , 1974 .

[2]  R. Grandhi,et al.  Safety index calculation using intervening variables for structural reliability analysis , 1996 .

[3]  R. J. Yang,et al.  Recent Applications on Reliability-Based Optimization of Automotive Structures , 2003 .

[4]  G. Cheng,et al.  A sequential approximate programming strategy for reliability-based structural optimization , 2006 .

[5]  T. Cruse,et al.  Advanced probabilistic structural analysis method for implicit performance functions , 1990 .

[6]  Johannes O. Royset,et al.  Reliability-based optimal structural design by the decoupling approach , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[7]  Ren-Jye Yang,et al.  Experience with approximate reliability-based optimization methods , 2003 .

[8]  Ren-Jye Yang,et al.  Experience with approximate reliability-based optimization methods II: an exhaust system problem , 2005 .

[9]  John Dalsgaard Sørensen,et al.  Reliability-Based Optimization in Structural Engineering , 1994 .

[10]  E. Nikolaidis,et al.  Reliability based optimization: A safety index approach , 1988 .

[11]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  A NEW STUDY ON RELIABILITY-BASED DESIGN OPTIMIZATION , 1999 .

[12]  Xiaoping Du,et al.  Sequential Optimization and Reliability Assessment Method for Efficient Probabilistic Design , 2004, DAC 2002.

[13]  R. Rackwitz,et al.  Non-Normal Dependent Vectors in Structural Safety , 1981 .

[14]  Ping Yi,et al.  Tolerance synthesis by a new method for system reliability-based optimization , 2005 .

[15]  T. Torng,et al.  AN ADVANCED RELIABILITY BASED OPTIMIZATION METHOD FOR ROBUST STRUCTURAL SYSTEM DESIGN , 1993 .

[16]  R. Grandhi,et al.  Efficient safety index calculation for structural reliability analysis , 1994 .

[17]  Liping Wang,et al.  AN EFFICIENT METHOD FOR PROBABILISTIC AND ROBUST DESIGN WITH NON -NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS , 2002 .

[18]  Lei Jiang,et al.  A sequential approximate programming strategy for performance-measure-based probabilistic structural design optimization , 2008 .

[19]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  General purpose procedure for reliability based structural optimization under parametric uncertainties , 1995 .

[20]  B. Youn,et al.  An Investigation of Nonlinearity of Reliability-Based Design Optimization Approaches , 2004 .

[21]  H. Thomas,et al.  A study of move limit adjustment strategies in the approximation concepts approach to structural synthesis , 1992 .

[22]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  Hybrid Analysis Method for Reliability-Based Design Optimization , 2003 .