Clinical Evaluation of Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Cervical and Thoracic Spine and Spinal Cord

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: DWI has the potential to improve the detection and evaluation of spine and spinal cord pathologies. This study assessed whether a recently described method (rFOV DWI) adds diagnostic value in clinical patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing clinically indicated cervical and/or thoracic spine imaging received standard anatomic sequences supplemented with sagittal rFOV DWI by using a b-value of 500 s/mm2. Two neuroradiologists blinded to clinical history evaluated the standard anatomic sequences only for pathology and provided their level of confidence in their diagnosis. These readers then rescored the examinations after reviewing the rFOV DWI study and indicated whether this sequence altered findings or confidence levels. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-three patients were included in this study. One hundred eighty patient scans (80.7%) demonstrated at least 1 pathologic finding. Interobserver agreement for identifying pathology (κ = 0.77) and in assessing the added value of the rFOV DWI sequence (κ = 0.77) was high. In pathologic cases, the rFOV DWI sequence added clinical utility in 33% of cases (P < .00001, Fisher exact test). The rFOV DWI sequence was found to be helpful in the evaluation of acute infarction, demyelination, infection, neoplasm, and intradural and epidural collections (P < .001, χ2 test) and provided a significant increase in clinical confidence in the evaluation of 11 of the 15 pathologic subtypes assessed (P < .05, 1-sided paired Wilcoxon test). CONCLUSIONS: rFOV diffusion-weighted imaging of the cervical and thoracic spine is feasible in a clinical population and increases clinical confidence in the diagnosis of numerous common spinal pathologies.

[1]  G. Zaharchuk,et al.  Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion Imaging of the Human Spinal Cord: Comparison with Conventional Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[2]  A. Osborn.  Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Differentiate Degenerative From Infectious Endplate Abnormalities in the Lumbar Spine , 2011 .

[3]  S. Pedraza,et al.  Diagnostic value of apparent diffusion coefficients to differentiate benign from malignant vertebral bone marrow lesions. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[4]  Jin Hyung Lee,et al.  DWI of the spinal cord with reduced FOV single‐shot EPI , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  S. Skare,et al.  Readout-segmented EPI for rapid high resolution diffusion imaging at 3 T. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[6]  Yong Liu,et al.  Optimization of b value in diffusion-weighted MRI for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant vertebral fractures , 2007, Skeletal Radiology.

[7]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Reduced field‐of‐view MRI using outer volume suppression for spinal cord diffusion imaging , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  E. Kholmovski,et al.  High‐resolution DTI with 2D interleaved multislice reduced FOV single‐shot diffusion‐weighted EPI (2D ss‐rFOV‐DWEPI) , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  Y. Huan,et al.  Multishot Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Features in Spinal Cord Infarction , 2005, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[10]  Kazuhiro Tsuchiya,et al.  Diffusion tractography of the cervical spinal cord by using parallel imaging. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[11]  Roland Bammer,et al.  Diffusion Imaging of the Human Spinal Cord and the Vertebral Column , 2003, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[12]  S. Maier,et al.  Quantitative assessment of diffusion abnormalities in benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures by line scan diffusion-weighted imaging. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  M. Horsfield,et al.  Sensitivity-encoded diffusion tensor MR imaging of the cervical cord. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[14]  R. Bammer.  Basic principles of diffusion-weighted imaging. , 2003, European journal of radiology.

[15]  R. Stollberger,et al.  Diffusion‐weighted imaging of the spinal cord: Interleaved echo‐planar imaging is superior to fast spin‐echo , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  W. Peh,et al.  Acute vertebral body compression fractures: discrimination between benign and malignant causes using apparent diffusion coefficients. , 2002, The British journal of radiology.

[17]  Xiaohong Joe Zhou,et al.  Characterization of benign and metastatic vertebral compression fractures with quantitative diffusion MR imaging. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[18]  E. Melhem,et al.  Technical challenges in MR imaging of the cervical spine and cord. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[19]  C. Holder.  MR diffusion imaging of the cervical spine. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[20]  P Wach,et al.  Diffusion-weighted imaging with navigated interleaved echo-planar imaging and a conventional gradient system. , 1999, Radiology.

[21]  G. Barker,et al.  Magnetic resonance diffusion imaging of the human cervical spinal cord in vivo , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  J. Kucharczyk,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of diffusion and perfusion , 1991, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[23]  D. Le Bihan.  Molecular diffusion nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. , 1991, Magnetic resonance quarterly.