The “Visual Shock” of Francis Bacon: an essay in neuroesthetics

In this paper we discuss the work of Francis Bacon in the context of his declared aim of giving a “visual shock.”We explore what this means in terms of brain activity and what insights into the brain's visual perceptive system his work gives. We do so especially with reference to the representation of faces and bodies in the human visual brain. We discuss the evidence that shows that both these categories of stimuli have a very privileged status in visual perception, compared to the perception of other stimuli, including man-made artifacts such as houses, chairs, and cars. We show that viewing stimuli that depart significantly from a normal representation of faces and bodies entails a significant difference in the pattern of brain activation. We argue that Bacon succeeded in delivering his “visual shock” because he subverted the normal neural representation of faces and bodies, without at the same time subverting the representation of man-made artifacts.

[1]  F. Simion,et al.  Congruency as a nonspecific perceptual property contributing to newborns' face preference. , 2008, Child development.

[2]  C. Pallis IMPAIRED IDENTIFICATION OF FACES AND PLACES WITH AGNOSIA FOR COLOURS , 1955, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[3]  Paul E. Downing,et al.  An event-related potential component sensitive to images of the human body , 2006, NeuroImage.

[4]  M. Botez,et al.  Course and outcome of visual static agnosia. , 1967, Journal of the neurological sciences.

[5]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[6]  A. Vighetto,et al.  An attention modulated response to disgust in human ventral anterior insula , 2003, Annals of neurology.

[7]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Unattended emotional faces elicit early lateralized amygdala–frontal and fusiform activations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[8]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  V. Stone,et al.  The Body-Inversion Effect , 2003, Psychological science.

[10]  Gilles Pourtois,et al.  Portraits or People? Distinct Representations of Face Identity in the Human Visual Cortex , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  P. Thompson,et al.  Margaret Thatcher: A New Illusion , 1980, Perception.

[12]  N. Hadjikhani,et al.  Seeing Fearful Body Expressions Activates the Fusiform Cortex and Amygdala , 2003, Current Biology.

[13]  Chi-Hua Chen,et al.  Frontoparietal Activation Distinguishes Face and Space from Artifact Concepts , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  P. Downing,et al.  The neural basis of visual body perception , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  Alberto Pisoni,et al.  The role of the occipital face area in holistic processing involved in face detection and discrimination: A tDCS study. , 2015, Neuropsychology.

[16]  E. Marg A VISION OF THE BRAIN , 1994 .

[17]  Teodora Gliga,et al.  Structural Encoding of Body and Face in Human Infants and Adults , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  Eleanor A. Maguire,et al.  Distinct Neural Systems for the Encoding and Recognition of Topography and Faces , 2001, NeuroImage.

[19]  西岡 啓治,et al.  Francis Bacon の文法 , 1995 .

[20]  J. M. Anderson,et al.  Responses of human frontal cortex to surprising events are predicted by formal associative learning theory , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys , 1995, Current Biology.

[22]  G. Winocur,et al.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  Rebecca F. Schwarzlose,et al.  Separate face and body selectivity on the fusiform gyrus. , 2010, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[24]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline , 1991, Cognition.

[25]  G. Assal,et al.  [Nonrecognition of familiar animals by a farmer. Zooagnosia or prosopagnosia for animals]. , 1984, Revue neurologique.

[26]  W. Grodd,et al.  Many Faces of Expertise: Fusiform Face Area in Chess Experts and Novices , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  E. Miller,et al.  Effects of Visual Experience on the Representation of Objects in the Prefrontal Cortex , 2000, Neuron.

[28]  S. Kojima,et al.  Configurational Factors in the Perception of Faces and Non-Facial Objects: An ERP Study , 2008, The International journal of neuroscience.

[29]  T. Kochiyama,et al.  Rapid amygdala gamma oscillations in response to fearful facial expressions , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  R. Dolan,et al.  Unconscious fear influences emotional awareness of faces and voices. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  R. Dolan,et al.  Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  B. Gelder Towards the neurobiology of emotional body language , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[33]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  The development of face expertise , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[34]  S. Petersen,et al.  Practice-related changes in human brain functional anatomy during nonmotor learning. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  François Mauguière,et al.  Early Amygdala Reaction to Fear Spreading in Occipital, Temporal, and Frontal Cortex A Depth Electrode ERP Study in Human , 2004, Neuron.

[36]  Raya Ariel,et al.  Congenital Visual Agnosia and Prosopagnosia in a Child: A Case Report , 1996, Cortex.

[37]  Kazumi Hirayama,et al.  Visual Agnosia for Line Drawings and Silhouettes without Apparent Impairment of Real-Object Recognition: A Case Report , 2009, Behavioural neurology.

[38]  S. Kojima,et al.  Magnetoencephalographic study of the neural responses in body perception , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[39]  J. Stekelenburg,et al.  The neural correlates of perceiving human bodies: an ERP study on the body-inversion effect , 2004, Neuroreport.

[40]  S. Grossberg Why do parallel cortical systems exist for the perception of static form and moving form? , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  Boris Suchan,et al.  Losing your Head: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Effects of Body Inversion , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The Effect of Face Inversion on Activity in Human Neural Systems for Face and Object Perception , 1999, Neuron.

[44]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Comparing neural correlates of configural processing in faces and objects: An ERP study of the Thatcher illusion , 2006, NeuroImage.

[45]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  E. Làdavas,et al.  I am blind, but I “see” fear , 2013, Cortex.

[47]  J. Sergent,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[48]  C. Umilta,et al.  Newborns’ preference for up–down asymmetrical configurations , 2002 .

[49]  B. Gelder,et al.  Paradoxical configuration effects for faces and objects in prosopagnosia , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  G. Yovel,et al.  TMS Evidence for the Involvement of the Right Occipital Face Area in Early Face Processing , 2007, Current Biology.

[51]  Semir Zeki,et al.  Splendors and Miseries of the Brain: Love, Creativity, and the Quest for Human Happiness , 2008 .

[52]  D. Perrett,et al.  A differential neural response in the human amygdala to fearful and happy facial expressions , 1996, Nature.

[53]  R. Kimchi,et al.  Perceptual separability of featural and configural information in congenital prosopagnosia , 2012, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[54]  K. Shadan,et al.  Available online: , 2012 .

[55]  G. V. Van Hoesen,et al.  Prosopagnosia , 1982, Neurology.

[56]  D. Pitcher,et al.  The role of the occipital face area in the cortical face perception network , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[57]  K. Mogg,et al.  Coarse threat images reveal theta oscillations in the amygdala: A magnetoencephalography study , 2009, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[58]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition , 2001, Vision Research.

[59]  Conny F. Schmidt,et al.  Face perception is mediated by a distributed cortical network , 2005, Brain Research Bulletin.

[60]  G. Humphreys,et al.  To See But Not To See: A Case Study Of Visual Agnosia , 1987 .

[61]  S. Zeki,et al.  Three cortical stages of colour processing in the human brain. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[62]  D. Maurer,et al.  The Composite-Face Effect Survives Asymmetric Face Distortions , 2012, Perception.

[63]  W. Krieg Functional Neuroanatomy , 1953, Springer Series in Experimental Entomology.

[64]  D. Hubel,et al.  Ferrier lecture - Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex , 1977, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[65]  C. C. Goren,et al.  Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants. , 1975, Pediatrics.

[66]  H. McConachie,et al.  Developmental Prosopagnosia. A Single Case Report , 1976, Cortex.