What do Cells Really Look Like? An Inquiry into Students’ Difficulties in Visualising a 3-D Biological Cell and Lessons for Pedagogy

In our explorations of students’ concepts in an inquiry science classroom with grade 6 students from urban schools in India, we uncovered a variety of problems in their understanding of biological cells as structural and functional units of living organisms. In particular, we found not only that they visualised the cell as a two-dimensional (2-D) structure, instead of a closed three-dimensional (3-D) functional unit, but that they had a strong resistance to changing their 2-D conception to a 3-D one. Based on analyses of students’ oral as well as written descriptions of cells in the classroom, and of models they made of the cell, we were able to identify the causes of students’ difficulties in correctly visualising the cell. These insights helped us design a pedagogy involving guided discussions and activities that challenges students’ 2-D conceptions of the cell. The activities entail very simple, low-cost, easily doable techniques to help students visualise the cell and to understand that it would not be able to function if its structure were 2-D. We also present the results of our investigations of conceptions of grade 7 students and biology undergraduates, revealing that the incorrect 2-D mental model can persist right up to the college level if it is not explicitly addressed. The classroom interactions described in this study illustrate how students’ ideas can be probed and addressed in the classroom using pedagogical action research.

[1]  Jim Minstrell,et al.  Inquiring into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science , 2000 .

[2]  Jennifer Morris,et al.  A combination of hand-held models and computer imaging programs helps students answer oral questions about molecular structure and function: a controlled investigation of student learning. , 2009, CBE life sciences education.

[3]  H. Patrick,et al.  Learning science through inquiry in kindergarten , 2008 .

[4]  Carl-Johan Rundgren,et al.  CRITICAL FEATURES OF VISUALIZATIONS OF TRANSPORT THROUGH THE CELL MEMBRANE—AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF UPPER SECONDARY AND TERTIARY STUDENTS’ MEANING-MAKING OF A STILL IMAGE AND AN ANIMATION , 2010 .

[5]  R. Driver,et al.  Making Sense of Secondary Science: Research into children’s ideas , 1993 .

[6]  Samia Khan.  Model‐based inquiries in chemistry , 2007 .

[7]  Margaret Brooks.  Drawing to Learn , 2009 .

[8]  Joel J. Mintzes,et al.  Students' alternative conceptions of the human circulatory system: A cross-age study , 1985 .

[9]  M. Chi.  Three Types of Conceptual Change: Belief Revision, Mental Model Transformation, and Categorical Shift , 2009 .

[10]  Shaaron E. Ainsworth,et al.  Drawing to Learn in Science , 2011, Science.

[11]  K. McGilly,et al.  Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice. , 1994 .

[12]  B. Crawford,et al.  Confronting Prospective Teachers' Ideas of Evolution and Scientific Inquiry Using Technology and Inquiry-Based Tasks , 2005 .

[13]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[14]  Ibrahim Erdogan,et al.  Teacher Questioning and Interaction Patterns in Classrooms Facilitated with Differing Levels of Constructivist Teaching Practices , 2008 .

[15]  David R. Thomas,et al.  A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data , 2006 .

[16]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Handbook of Research on Science Education , 2023 .

[17]  Amos Dreyfus,et al.  The Pupil and the Living Cell: A Taxonomy of Dysfunctional Ideas about an Abstract Idea. , 1989 .

[18]  Ian James Mitchell,et al.  Learning from Teacher Research , 2002 .

[19]  A. Yarden,et al.  Experienced Junior-High-School Teachers’ PCK in Light of a Curriculum Change: “The Cell is to be Studied Longitudinally” , 2009 .

[20]  Nancy Aguilar-Roca,et al.  Garage demos: using physical models to illustrate dynamic aspects of microscopic biological processes. , 2009, CBE life sciences education.

[21]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Secondary students' mental models of atoms and molecules: Implications for teaching chemistry , 1996 .

[22]  D. Treagust,et al.  Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning , 2003 .

[23]  John Elliott,et al.  What Have We Learned from Action Research in School‐based Evaluation? , 1993 .

[24]  K. T. Boersma,et al.  Systems Modelling and the Development of Coherent Understanding of Cell Biology , 2008 .

[25]  A. Dreyfus,et al.  The cell concept of 10th graders: curricular expectations and reality , 1988 .

[26]  Microscopy images as interactive tools in cell modeling and cell biology education. , 2004, Cell biology education.

[27]  W. McComas.  Benchmarks for Science Literacy , 2014 .

[28]  M. Orgill,et al.  Analysis of Essential Features of Inquiry Found in Articles Published in The Science Teacher, 1998–2007 , 2010 .

[29]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Guided discovery in a community of learners. , 1994 .

[30]  Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al.  The Learning Environment as a Site of Science Education Reform. , 1995 .

[31]  Reuven Lazarowitz,et al.  Learning the Cell Structures with Three-Dimensional Models: Students’ Achievement by Methods, Type of School and Questions’ Cognitive Level , 2013 .

[32]  P. Mathis.  The Use of Manipulative Models in Teaching Mitosis and Meiosis , 1979 .

[33]  Philip Scott,et al.  The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons , 2006 .

[34]  Fernando Flores,et al.  Representation of the cell and its processes in high school students: An integrated view , 2003 .

[35]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Some observations on mental models , 1987 .

[36]  Bridget Somekh,et al.  The Contribution of Action Research to Development in Social Endeavours: a position paper on action research methodology , 1995 .

[37]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students , 1998 .

[38]  P. Johnson-Laird.  Mental models , 1989 .

[39]  M. Foote.  Recognizing Spatial Relationships in Biology. , 1981 .

[40]  P. Clément.  Introducing the Cell Concept with both Animal and Plant Cells: A Historical and Didactic Approach , 2007 .

[41]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  Mental Models of the Day/Night Cycle , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[42]  J. D. Bradley,et al.  Identification and rectification of student difficulties concerning three-dimensional structures, rotation, and reflection , 1991 .