An alternate line erasure and readout (ALER) method for implementing slot-scan imaging technique with a flat-panel detector-initial experiences

This paper describes and demonstrates an electronic collimation method, referred to as the alternate line erasure and readout (ALER) technique, for implementing slot-scan digital radiography technique with an amorphous silicon (a-Si) thin-film transistor (TFT) array based flat-panel detector. An amorphus selenium (a-Se) flat-panel detector was modified to implement the ALER technique for slot-scan imaging. A stepping-motor driven fore-collimator was mounted in front of an X-ray tube to generate a scanning X-ray fan beam. The scanning speed and magnification were adjusted to synchronize the fan beam motion with the image line readout rate. The image lines on the leading and trailing edges of the fan beam were tracked and alternately reset and read out, respectively. The former operation resulted in the erasure of the scatter signals accumulated in the leading edge image line prior to the arrival of the fan beam. The latter operation resulted in the acquisition of fan beam exposure data integrated in the trailing edge image line right after the fan beam passed. To demonstrate the scatter rejection capability of this technique, an anthropomorphic chest phantom was placed in PA position and scanned at a speed of 576 lines (8.0 cm)/s at 117 kVp and 32 mA. A tungsten bar is placed at the entrance side of the chest phantom to measure the scatter-to-primary ratio (SPR), scatter reduction factor (SRF), and contrast-to-noise ratio degradation factor (CNRDF) in the slot-scan images to evaluate the effectiveness of scatter rejection and the resultant improvement of image quality. SPR and CNRDF in the open-field images were also measured and used as the reference for comparison. A scatter reduction by 86.4 to 95.4% across lower lung and heart regions has been observed with slot-scan imaging. The CNRs have been found to be improved by a factor of 2 in the mediastinum areas over the open-field image as well.

[1]  Andreas Koch,et al.  Design and evaluation of a slot-scanning full-field digital mammography system , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[2]  I A Brezovich,et al.  Scanning multiple slit assembly: a practical and efficient device to reduce scatter. , 1977, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  D B Plewes,et al.  A scanning system for chest radiography with regional exposure control: practical implementation. , 1983, Medical physics.

[4]  Albert de Roos,et al.  Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography for detection of simulated nodules and interstitial disease in a chest phantom. , 2004, Radiology.

[5]  G T Barnes,et al.  Scanning slit chest radiography: a practical and efficient scatter control design. , 1994, Radiology.

[6]  H Helen Liu,et al.  Dm rather than Dw should be used in Monte Carlo treatment planning. For the proposition. , 2002, Medical physics.

[7]  W Huda,et al.  Scattered radiation in scanning slot mammography. , 1998, Medical physics.

[8]  C E Ravin,et al.  Scatter fractions in AMBER imaging. , 1990, Radiology.

[9]  J. Boone,et al.  Scatter/primary in mammography: comprehensive results. , 2000, Medical physics.

[10]  R E Latchaw,et al.  Diode array digital radiography: initial clinical experience. , 1982, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  E W Webster,et al.  Radiographic contrast improvement by means of slit radiography. , 1975, Radiology.

[12]  Chris C. Shaw,et al.  Scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR): implementation with a flat-panel detector , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[13]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Fundamental imaging characteristics of a slot-scan digital chest radiographic system. , 2004, Medical physics.

[14]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  Tables of X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients and Mass Energy-Absorption Coefficients 1 keV to 20 MeV for Elements Z = 1 to 92 and 48 Additional Substances of Dosimetric Interest , 1995 .

[15]  B S Slasky,et al.  Digital radiography of the chest by self-scanning linear diode arrays. , 1987, Acta radiologica.

[16]  C E Ravin,et al.  Measurement of scatter fractions in clinical bedside radiography. , 1992, Radiology.

[17]  G T Barnes,et al.  Contrast and scatter in x-ray imaging. , 1991, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[18]  A computer‐controlled x‐ray imaging scanner using a kinestatic charge detector , 1990 .

[19]  J A Sorenson,et al.  Scatter rejection by air gaps: an empirical model. , 1985, Medical physics.

[20]  K Doi,et al.  Physical characteristics of scattered radiation in diagnostic radiology: Monte Carlo simulation studies. , 1985, Medical physics.

[21]  James A. Sorenson,et al.  Scattered radiation in chest radiography. , 1981, Medical physics.

[22]  Martin J Yaffe,et al.  A slot-scanned photodiode-array/CCD hybrid detector for digital mammography. , 2002, Medical physics.

[23]  D Gur,et al.  Effectiveness of Antiscatter Grids in Digital Radiography: A Phantom Study , 1994, Investigative radiology.

[24]  J. Sorenson,et al.  Rotating disk device for slit radiography of the chest. , 1980, Radiology.

[25]  J A Sorenson,et al.  Investigations of moving-slit radiography. , 1976, Radiology.

[26]  U Neitzel,et al.  Grids or air gaps for scatter reduction in digital radiography: a model calculation. , 1992, Medical physics.

[27]  R A Kruger,et al.  Scatter rejection by electronic collimation. , 1986, Medical physics.

[28]  P. Keall Dm rather than Dw should be used in Monte Carlo treatment planning. Against the proposition. , 2002, Medical physics.

[29]  S Rudin,et al.  Improved contrast in special procedures using a rotating aperture wheel (RAW) device. , 1980, Radiology.

[30]  A Fenster,et al.  A time-delay integration charge-coupled device camera for slot-scanned digital radiography. , 1990, Medical physics.