TIL: AN INNOVATIVE TOOL FOR THE RECRUITMENT OF BACHELOR ENGINEERING STUDENTS IN ITALY

This paper summarizes the guidelines and the main results of the set-up of an access Test in Laib –TIL performed at Politecnico di Torino, Italy, during the last decade. Many reasons forced to define this proprietary tool, such as the introduction of the numerus clausus and the consequent need of an effective and robust evaluation process associated to merit, the improvement of the attractiveness at the national and international level, and the reduction of the drop-out rate.  This test was able to supply several functions, useful both for the university and the potential students. It demonstrated to be a reliable and predictable tool for evaluating the competence background needed for a successful career in a technical university. In addition, it is a self-assessment test for the applicants able to contribute to a conscious individual choice.

[1]  M Y E Selim,et al.  Do Secondary School Grades Predict the Performance of Engineering Students? , 2009 .

[2]  Per-Erik Lyrén.  Prediction of Academic Performance by Means of the Swedish Scholastic Assessment Test , 2008 .

[3]  Wei Chi,et al.  Do College Entrance Examination Scores Predict Undergraduate GPAs? A Tale of Two Universities , 2013 .

[4]  Adrian Page,et al.  Influences on engineering enrolments. A synthesis of the findings of recent reports , 2009 .

[5]  Grant Harman,et al.  Student selection and admission to higher education:Policies and practices in the Asian region , 1994 .

[6]  P. B. Morice.  Recruitment of Engineering Students in the UK , 1990 .

[7]  R. Pascoe.  Admission to Australian Universities. , 1999 .

[8]  K. Scheiter,et al.  Do it twice! Test-taking fosters repeated but not initial study of multimedia instruction , 2017 .

[9]  Geoff Potvin,et al.  Identity, Critical Agency, and Engineering: An Affective Model for Predicting Engineering as a Career Choice , 2016 .

[10]  D. Shen,et al.  Women Engineering Students and Self‐Efficacy: A Multi‐Year, Multi‐Institution Study of Women Engineering Student Self‐Efficacy , 2009 .

[11]  Umar Ali,et al.  Predictability of engineering students’ performance at the University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar from admission test conducted by educational testing and evaluation agency (ETEA), NWFP, Pakistan , 2010 .

[12]  Nadir Zanini,et al.  Away, but not too far from home. The effects of financial aid on university enrolment decisions , 2015 .

[13]  S. Wolter,et al.  Reducing university dropout rates with entrance tests – self-fulfilling prophecy or high quality students , 2015 .

[14]  Gunnar Graeffe.  Experimenting with New Criteria for Recruitment into Engineering , 1989 .

[15]  Amy Liu.  Unraveling the myth of meritocracy within the context of US higher education , 2011 .

[16]  Mark J. Gierl,et al.  The impact of immediate test score reporting on university students' achievement emotions in the context of computer-based multiple-choice exams , 2017 .

[17]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Do students use testing and feedback while learning? A focus on key concept definitions and learning to criterion , 2015 .

[18]  Patricia B. Campbell,et al.  Upping the Numbers: Using Research-Based Decision Making To Increase Diversity in the Quantitative Disciplines. , 2002 .

[19]  G. F. Schaefler.  Wastage remedy—The use of an entrance test , 1962 .

[20]  E. Seymour,et al.  Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave The Sciences , 1997 .

[21]  Understanding ‘fairness’ in student selection: are there differences and does it make a difference anyway? , 2016 .

[22]  Lars Geschwind,et al.  More students of better quality? Effects of a mathematics and physics aptitude test on student performance , 2017 .

[23]  G. Migliaretti,et al.  Is the admission test for a course in medicine a good predictor of academic performance? A case−control experience at the school of medicine of Turin , 2017, BMJ Open.

[24]  Dawn G. Williams,et al.  Why Students Leave Engineering: The Unexpected Bond , 2006 .

[25]  A. Ooms,et al.  Student nurse selection and predictability of academic success: The Multiple Mini Interview project. , 2016, Nurse education today.