Reasoning on Engineering Knowledge: Applications and Desired Features

The development and operation of highly flexible automated systems for discrete manufacturing, which can quickly adapt to changing products, has become a major research field in industrial automation. Adapting a manufacturing system to a new product for instance requires comparing the systems functionality against the requirements imposed by the changed product. With an increasing frequency of product changes, this comparison should be automated. Unfortunately, there is no standard way to model the functionality of a manufacturing system, which is an obstacle to automation. The engineer still has to analyze all documents provided by engineering tools like 3D-CAD data, electrical CAD data or controller code. In order to support this time consuming process, it is necessary to model the so-called skills of a manufacturing system. A skill represents certain features an engineer has to check during the adaption of a manufacturing system, e.g. the kinematic of an assembly or the maximum load for a gripper. Semantic Web Technologies (SWT) provide a feasible solution for modeling and reasoning on the knowledge of these features. This paper provides the results of a project that focused on modeling the kinematic skills of assemblies. The overall approach as well as further requirements are shown. Since not all expectations on reasoning functionality could be met by available reasoners, the paper focuses on desired reasoning features that would support the further use of SWT in the engineering domain.

[1]  Alexander Fay,et al.  Knowledge-based Engineering of Automation Systems using Ontologies and Engineering Data , 2015, KEOD.

[2]  Thomas Andreas Meyer,et al.  Introducing Defeasibility into OWL Ontologies , 2015, International Semantic Web Conference.

[3]  Birgit Vogel-Heuser,et al.  Automatic generation of field control strategies for supporting (re-)engineering of manufacturing systems , 2012, J. Intell. Manuf..

[4]  Mozafar Saadat,et al.  On Designing a Unified Ontology for Holonic Manufacturing Networks , 2013 .

[5]  Michael Kifer,et al.  Representing Flexible Role-Based Access Control Policies Using Objects and Defeasible Reasoning , 2015, RuleML.

[6]  Abdur Rakib,et al.  Modeling and verifying context-aware non-monotonic reasoning agents , 2015, 2015 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Formal Methods and Models for Codesign (MEMOCODE).

[7]  Letizia Tanca,et al.  Requirements and languages for the semantic representation of manufacturing systems , 2016, Comput. Ind..

[8]  Ulrich Epple,et al.  Reference model of Industrie 4.0 service architectures , 2015, Autom..

[9]  Dimitris Mourtzis,et al.  Decentralized manufacturing systems review: challenges and outlook , 2012, Logist. Res..

[10]  Alexander Fay,et al.  Software Support for Building Automation Requirements Engineering—An Application of Semantic Web Technologies in Automation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[11]  Christoph Legat,et al.  Knowledge-Based Technologies for Future Factory Engineering and Control , 2012, Service Orientation in Holonic and Multi Agent Manufacturing and Robotics.

[12]  Brigitte Moench,et al.  Engineering Design A Systematic Approach , 2016 .

[13]  Birgit Vogel-Heuser,et al.  Challenges for Software Engineering in Automation , 2014 .

[14]  Alexander Fay,et al.  Risk minimization in modernization projects of plant automation — A knowledge-based approach by means of semantic web technologies , 2011, ETFA2011.

[15]  Peter Nyhuis,et al.  Changeable Manufacturing - Classification, Design and Operation , 2007 .

[16]  Jürgen Beyerer,et al.  Plug & produce by modelling skills and service-oriented orchestration of reconfigurable manufacturing systems , 2015, Autom..

[17]  Oliver Niggemann,et al.  Integrating semantics for diagnosis of manufacturing systems , 2016, 2016 IEEE 21st International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA).

[18]  Yoram Koren,et al.  Product variety and manufacturing complexity in assembly systems and supply chains , 2008 .

[19]  Cecilia Zanni-Merk,et al.  An Intelligent Data Analysis Framework for Supporting Perception of Geospatial Phenomena , 2016, FOIS.

[20]  José L. Martínez Lastra,et al.  Semantics-Based Composition of Factory Automation Processes Encapsulated by Web Services , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[21]  Pavel Vrba,et al.  Ontologies for flexible production systems , 2015, 2015 IEEE 20th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA).

[22]  Bijan Parsia,et al.  A Survey of Current, Stand-alone OWL Reasoners , 2015, ORE.

[23]  José L. Martínez Lastra,et al.  Product, process and resource model coupling for knowledge-driven assembly automation , 2016, Autom..

[24]  David Hästbacka,et al.  Context modeling with situation rules for industrial maintenance , 2016, 2016 IEEE 21st International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA).

[25]  Christoph Legat,et al.  Ontology-based validation of plant models , 2013, 2013 11th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN).