Space-based Earth observation in support of the UNFCCC Paris Agreement

Space-based Earth observation (EO), in the form of long-term climate data records, has been crucial in the monitoring and quantification of slow changes in the climate system—from accumulating greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the atmosphere, increasing surface temperatures, and melting sea-ice, glaciers and ice sheets, to rising sea-level. In addition to documenting a changing climate, EO is needed for effective policy making, implementation and monitoring, and ultimately to measure progress and achievements towards the overarching goals of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Paris Agreement to combat climate change. The best approach for translating EO into actionable information for policymakers and other stakeholders is, however, far from clear. For example, climate change is now self-evident through increasingly intense and frequent extreme events—heatwaves, droughts, wildfires, and flooding—costing human lives and significant economic damage, even though single events do not constitute “climate”. EO can capture and visualize the impacts of such events in single images, and thus help quantify and ultimately manage them within the framework of the UNFCCC Paris Agreement, both at the national level (via the Enhanced Transparency Framework) and global level (via the Global Stocktake). We present a transdisciplinary perspective, across policy and science, and also theory and practice, that sheds light on the potential of EO to inform mitigation, including sinks and reservoirs of greenhouse gases, and adaptation, including loss and damage. Yet to be successful with this new mandate, EO science must undergo a radical overhaul: it must become more user-oriented, collaborative, and transdisciplinary; span the range from fiducial to contextual data; and embrace new technologies for data analysis (e.g., artificial intelligence). Only this will allow the creation of the knowledge base and actionable climate information needed to guide the UNFCCC Paris Agreement to a just and equitable success.

[1]  J. Blunden,et al.  State of the Climate in 2021 , 2022, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.

[2]  Ipcc.  Global Warming of 1.5°C , 2022 .

[3]  P. Ciais,et al.  Large CO2 Emitters as Seen From Satellite: Comparison to a Gridded Global Emission Inventory , 2022, Geophysical research letters.

[4]  Sujay V. Kumar,et al.  Changes in land use enhance the sensitivity of tropical ecosystems to fire-climate extremes , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[5]  K. Bjella,et al.  Impacts of permafrost degradation on infrastructure , 2022, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment.

[6]  G. Hegerl,et al.  The value of values in climate science , 2022, Nature Climate Change.

[7]  T. Lauvaux,et al.  Global assessment of oil and gas methane ultra-emitters , 2021, Science.

[8]  M. Buchwitz,et al.  Assimilation of atmospheric CO2 observations from space can support national CO2 emission inventories , 2021, Environmental Research Letters.

[9]  Adaptation Gap Report 2020 , 2021 .

[10]  T. Shepherd.  Bringing physical reasoning into statistical practice in climate-change science , 2021, Climatic Change.

[11]  Gabrielle J. M. De Lannoy,et al.  A Review of Irrigation Information Retrievals from Space and Their Utility for Users , 2021, Remote. Sens..

[12]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[13]  T. Borsdorff,et al.  The added value of satellite observations of methane forunderstanding the contemporary methane budget , 2021, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A.

[14]  M. Kandlikar,et al.  Climate services promise better decisions but mainly focus on better data , 2021, Nature Climate Change.

[15]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Comparing national greenhouse gas budgets reported in UNFCCC inventories against atmospheric inversions , 2021, Earth System Science Data.

[16]  J. Blunden,et al.  State of the Climate in 2020 , 2021, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.

[17]  T. Shepherd,et al.  Climate change attribution and legal contexts: evidence and the role of storylines , 2021, Climatic Change.

[18]  Felix Rembold,et al.  A review of satellite-based global agricultural monitoring systems available for Africa , 2021 .

[19]  K. Calvin,et al.  Critical adjustment of land mitigation pathways for assessing countries’ climate progress , 2021, Nature Climate Change.

[20]  Philip Smith,et al.  Emerging reporting and verification needs under the Paris Agreement: How can the research community effectively contribute? , 2021, Environmental science & policy.

[21]  R. Goldblatt,et al.  Remotely Sensed Derived Land Surface Temperature (LST) as a Proxy for Air Temperature and Thermal Comfort at a Small Geographical Scale , 2021, Land.

[22]  B. Menounos,et al.  Accelerated global glacier mass loss in the early twenty-first century , 2021, Nature.

[23]  G. Danabasoglu,et al.  Predictable Variations of the Carbon Sinks and Atmospheric CO2 Growth in a Multi‐Model Framework , 2021, Geophysical Research Letters.

[24]  M. Peeters.  THE GLOBAL STOCKTAKE , 2021 .

[25]  G. Lannoy,et al.  SMOS-IC data record of soil moisture and L-VOD: Historical development, applications and perspectives , 2021, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[26]  G. Bonan,et al.  The signature of internal variability in the terrestrial carbon cycle , 2021, Environmental Research Letters.

[27]  M. Herold,et al.  Global maps of twenty-first century forest carbon fluxes , 2021, Nature Climate Change.

[28]  M. Herold,et al.  An assessment of data sources, data quality and changes in national forest monitoring capacities in the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005–2020 , 2021, Environmental Research Letters.

[29]  A. Cazenave,et al.  Headline Indicators for Global Climate Monitoring , 2020, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.

[30]  W. Filho,et al.  Monitoring Adaptation Using Earth Observations in View of the “Global Stocktake” , 2021, Handbook of Climate Change Management.

[31]  P. Ciais,et al.  PMIF v1.0: assessing the potential of satellite observations to constrain CO2 emissions from large cities and point sources over the globe using synthetic data , 2020, Geoscientific Model Development.

[32]  M. Toohey,et al.  Overview and update of the SPARC Data Initiative: comparison of stratospheric composition measurements from satellite limb sounders , 2020, Earth System Science Data.

[33]  Jacqueline Boutin,et al.  Consistency of Satellite Climate Data Records for Earth System Monitoring , 2020, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.

[34]  S. Kotlarski,et al.  Observed snow depth trends in the European Alps: 1971 to 2019 , 2020, The Cryosphere.

[35]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Global Carbon Budget 2020 , 2020, Earth System Science Data.

[36]  M. Webb,et al.  An Assessment of Earth's Climate Sensitivity Using Multiple Lines of Evidence , 2020, Reviews of geophysics.

[37]  P. Ciais,et al.  Toward an Operational Anthropogenic CO2 Emissions Monitoring and Verification Support Capacity , 2020, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.

[38]  P. Ciais,et al.  Observing carbon dioxide emissions over China's cities and industrial areas with the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 , 2020 .

[39]  J. Lenters,et al.  Global lake responses to climate change , 2020, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment.

[40]  J. Canadell,et al.  On the role of trend and variability in the hydroxyl radical (OH) in the global methane budget , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[41]  O. Schneising,et al.  Remote sensing of methane leakage from natural gas and petroleum systems revisited , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[42]  J. Shumake-Guillemot,et al.  Making Society Climate Resilient: International Progress under the Global Framework for Climate Services , 2020, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.

[43]  Thomas Esch,et al.  Outlining where humans live, the World Settlement Footprint 2015 , 2019, Scientific Data.

[44]  V. Brovkin,et al.  The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017 , 2016, Earth System Science Data.

[45]  Christopher O. Justice,et al.  No pixel left behind: Toward integrating Earth Observations for agriculture into the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals framework , 2019 .

[46]  E. Cerdá,et al.  Climate change impacts on renewable energy generation. A review of quantitative projections , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[47]  Stronger Climate Resilience with Insurance , 2019, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.

[48]  Arnaud Mialon,et al.  Satellite-observed pantropical carbon dynamics , 2019, Nature Plants.

[49]  W. Bloh,et al.  Importance of snow and glacier meltwater for agriculture on the Indo-Gangetic Plain , 2019, Nature Sustainability.

[50]  Kei Shiomi,et al.  A scientific algorithm to simultaneously retrieve carbon monoxide and methane from TROPOMI onboard Sentinel-5 Precursor , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[51]  T. Shepherd,et al.  Climate Scientists’ Wide Prediction Intervals May Be More Likely but Are Perceived to Be Less Certain , 2019, Weather, Climate, and Society.

[52]  N. Koutsias,et al.  Historical background and current developments for mapping burned area from satellite Earth observation , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[53]  Frank Flechtner,et al.  Contributions of GRACE to understanding climate change , 2019, Nature Climate Change.

[54]  M. Thompson,et al.  Decision Making Under Contradictory Certainties: How to Save the Himalayas When you can't Find Out what's wrong with them * , 2019, Risk Management.

[55]  M. Thomson,et al.  On the use and misuse of climate change projections in international development , 2019, WIREs Climate Change.

[56]  K. S. Sajinkumar,et al.  Satellite-based assessment of the August 2018 flood in parts of Kerala, India , 2019, Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk.

[57]  Marino Palacios,et al.  Earth Observation Actionable Information Supporting Disaster Risk Reduction Efforts in a Sustainable Development Framework , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[58]  M. L. Gitarskiy.  THE REFINEMENT TO THE 2006 IPCC GUIDELINES FOR NATIONAL GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORIES , 2019, Fundamental and Applied Climatology.

[59]  Heleen de Coninck,et al.  Technical Summary. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways , 2018 .

[60]  Katharine Vincent,et al.  What can climate services learn from theory and practice of co-production? , 2018, Climate Services.

[61]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Impact of the 2015/2016 El Niño on the terrestrial carbon cycle constrained by bottom-up and top-down approaches , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[62]  G. Anandarajah,et al.  Climate change impacts on the energy system: a review of trends and gaps , 2018, Climatic Change.

[63]  J. Townshend,et al.  Global land change from 1982 to 2016 , 2018, Nature.

[64]  Haili Hu,et al.  Toward Global Mapping of Methane With TROPOMI: First Results and Intersatellite Comparison to GOSAT , 2018 .

[65]  Arnaud Mialon,et al.  Satellite passive microwaves reveal recent climate-induced carbon losses in African drylands , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[66]  John D. Bolten,et al.  A MODIS-based automated flood monitoring system for southeast asia , 2017, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[67]  Yoichi Kaya,et al.  Prove Paris was more than paper promises , 2017, Nature.

[68]  Wolfgang Wagner,et al.  Uncertainty information in climate data records from Earth observation , 2017 .

[69]  K. V. Suryabhagavan,et al.  Land use and land cover changes and Soil erosion in Yezat Watershed, North Western Ethiopia , 2017, International Soil and Water Conservation Research.

[70]  Katherine Anderson,et al.  Earth observation in service of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development , 2017, Geo spatial Inf. Sci..

[71]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  A manifesto for reproducible science , 2017, Nature Human Behaviour.

[72]  Y. Yu.  An enhanced transparency framework , 2017 .

[73]  D. Klein.  The Paris Agreement on Climate Change : analysis and commentary , 2017 .

[74]  W. Salas,et al.  Attribution of net carbon change by disturbance type across forest lands of the conterminous United States , 2016, Carbon Balance and Management.

[75]  Hartmut Boesch,et al.  Satellite-derived methane hotspot emission estimates using a fast data-driven method , 2016 .

[76]  R. Betts,et al.  El Nino and a record CO2 rise , 2016 .

[77]  David C Rose,et al.  The case for policy-relevant conservation science , 2014, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[78]  Benjamin Leon Bodirsky,et al.  Land-use protection for climate change mitigation , 2014 .

[79]  E. Kort,et al.  Four corners: The largest US methane anomaly viewed from space , 2014 .

[80]  Pete Smith,et al.  Co‐benefits, trade‐offs, barriers and policies for greenhouse gas mitigation in the agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) sector , 2014, Global change biology.

[81]  D. Rose,et al.  Five ways to enhance the impact of climate science , 2014 .

[82]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  Extreme events in gross primary production: a characterization across continents , 2014 .

[83]  T. Shepherd,et al.  Reconciliation of Halogen-Induced Ozone Loss with the Total-Column Ozone Record , 2014 .

[84]  Hartmut Boesch,et al.  Inverse modelling of CH 4 emissions for 2010–2011 using different satellite retrieval products from GOSAT and SCIAMACHY , 2014 .

[85]  Douglas Cripe,et al.  Earth Observations for Global Water Security , 2013 .

[86]  A. Cazenave,et al.  The ESA Climate Change Initiative: Satellite Data Records for Essential Climate Variables , 2013 .

[87]  Steven W. Running,et al.  A Measurable Planetary Boundary for the Biosphere , 2012, Science.

[88]  P. Ciais,et al.  Carbon Cycle Uncertainty in REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes (RECCAP) , 2012 .

[89]  Huadong Guo,et al.  Next-generation Digital Earth , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[90]  A. Corner,et al.  Uncertainty, scepticism and attitudes towards climate change: biased assimilation and attitude polarisation , 2012, Climatic Change.

[91]  T. Lantz,et al.  Impacts of a recent storm surge on an Arctic delta ecosystem examined in the context of the last millennium , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[92]  A. Cazenave,et al.  Sea-Level Rise and Its Impact on Coastal Zones , 2010, Science.

[93]  Y. Shimabukuro,et al.  The Incidence of Fire in Amazonian Forests with Implications for REDD , 2010, Science.

[94]  W. Landman.  Climate change 2007: the physical science basis , 2010 .

[95]  S. Hagemann,et al.  Vulnerability of Permafrost Carbon to Climate Change: Implications for the Global Carbon Cycle , 2008 .

[96]  F. Woodward,et al.  Global responses of terrestrial productivity to contemporary climatic oscillations , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[97]  D. Scott,et al.  Climate change vulnerability of the US Northeast winter recreation– tourism sector , 2008 .

[98]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Tipping elements in the Earth's climate system , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[99]  C. Pohl,et al.  The Emergence of Transdisciplinarity as a Form of Research , 2008 .

[100]  Ruth S. DeFries,et al.  Earth observations for estimating greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation in developing countries , 2007 .

[101]  Fikret Berkes,et al.  Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: lessons from resilience thinking , 2007 .

[102]  T. Wilbanks,et al.  Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[103]  D. Sarewitz.  How science makes environmental controversies worse , 2004 .

[104]  Tuomas Laurila,et al.  The timing of snow melt controls the annual CO2 balance in a subarctic fen , 2004 .

[105]  C. S. Holling.  From Complex Regions to Complex Worlds , 2004 .

[106]  H. Etzkowitz.  Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations , 2002 .

[107]  David W. Cash,et al.  Knowledge systems for sustainable development , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[108]  B. Kushner.  Descartes' error. , 1998, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[109]  D. Eade.  Capacity-Building: An Approach to People-Centred Development , 1997 .

[110]  Deborah Eade,et al.  Capacity-Building: Shifting the paradigms of practice , 1997 .

[111]  J. Muller,et al.  Terrestrial remote sensing science and algorithms planned for EOS/MODIS , 1994 .

[112]  A. Tversky,et al.  Variants of uncertainty , 1982, Cognition.

[113]  E. F. Schumacher.  Small Is Beautiful: Economics as if People Mattered , 1973 .