PCA-based linear parameter varying control of SCR aftertreatment systems

Hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, and other polluting emissions produced by diesel engines are usually much lower than those by gasoline engines. However, higher combustion temperature in diesel engines cause substantially larger percentage of nitrogen oxides (NOχ) emissions. Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) is a well proven technology for reducing NOx emissions from automotive sources and in particular, heavy-duty diesel engines. In this paper, we develop a quasi linear parameter varying (qLPV) model to capture the non-linearities in the dynamics of the ammonia SCR system with varying catalyst surface temperature. To effectively enable the use of LMI-based control design methods, the number of LPV parameters in the qLPV model is then reduced by using the principal component analysis (PCA) technique. An LPV feedback/feedforward controller is designed for the qLPV model with reduced number of scheduling parameters. The designed full-order controller is further simplified to a first-order transfer function with parameter-varying gain and pole. Finally, simulation results illustrate the high conversion efficiency with minimum ammonia slip of the closed-loop SCR system using the parameter-varying control law.

[1]  Junmin Wang,et al.  Diesel Engine Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) Ammonia Surface Coverage Control Using a Computationally-Efficient Model Predictive Control Assisted Method , 2009 .

[2]  Christopher H. Onder,et al.  Control of an SCR catalytic converter system for a mobile heavy-duty application , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[3]  Pio Forzatti,et al.  Adequacy of lumped parameter models for SCR reactors with monolith structure , 1992 .

[4]  P. Apkarian,et al.  Advanced gain-scheduling techniques for uncertain systems , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 American Control Conference (Cat. No.97CH36041).

[5]  Gordon G. Parker,et al.  Model-Based Estimation and Control System Development in a Urea-SCR Aftertreatment System , 2008 .

[6]  M. Elsener,et al.  Urea-SCR: a promising technique to reduce NOx emissions from automotive diesel engines , 2000 .

[7]  J. N. Chi,et al.  Modeling and Control of a Urea-SCR Aftertreatment System , 2005 .

[8]  Wilson J. Rugh,et al.  Research on gain scheduling , 2000, Autom..

[9]  Herbert Werner,et al.  PCA-Based Parameter Set Mappings for LPV Models With Fewer Parameters and Less Overbounding , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[10]  Devesh Upadhyay,et al.  Modeling of a Urea SCR Catalyst With Automotive Applications , 2002 .

[11]  S. Bittanti,et al.  Affine Parameter-Dependent Lyapunov Functions and Real Parametric Uncertainty , 1996 .

[12]  Michiel J. Van Nieuwstadt,et al.  Model Based Analysis and Control Design of a Urea-SCR deNOx Aftertreatment System , 2006 .

[13]  Ian T. Jolliffe,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2002, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.