Increasing Trend of Damaging Bird Strikes with Aircraft Outside the Airport Boundary: Implications for Mitigation Measures

A basic tenet of programs to mitigate the risks of bird strikes with aircraft has been to focus management efforts at airports because various historical analyses of bird-strike data for civil aviation have indicated the majority of strikes occur in this environment during take-off and landing at 500 feet AGL increased signifi cantly from about 25% in 1990 to 30% in 2009. The percentage of all damaging strikes that occurred at >500 feet increased at a greater rate, from about 37% in the early 1990s to 45% during 2005 to 2009. I also examined trends in strike rates (strikes/1 million commercial aircraft movements) for strikes occurring at 500 feet. From 1990 to 2009, the damaging strike rate at >500 feet increased from about 2.5 to 4.0, whereas the damaging strike rate for strikes at 1.8 kg, showed a pattern similar to that for all species. I conclude that mitigation efforts incrementally implemented at airports in the United States during the past 20 years have resulted in a reduction of damaging strikes in the airport environment. This reduction in strikes has occurred in spite of increases in populations of Canada geese and many other species hazardous to aircraft. However, these successful mitigation efforts, which must be sustained, have done little to reduce strikes outside the airport. Increased efforts now are needed to eliminate bird attractants within 5 miles of airports, to further develop bird-detecting radar and bird-migration forecasting, and to research avian sensory perception to enhance aircraft detection and avoidance by birds.

[1]  B. F. Blackwell,et al.  EFFICACY OF AIRCRAFT LANDING LIGHTS IN STIMULATING AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR IN BIRDS , 2004 .

[2]  Robert C. Beason,et al.  Role of near-miss bird strikes in assessing hazards , 2009 .

[3]  Richard A. Dolbeer,et al.  Wildlife Strikes to Civil Aircraft in the United States 1990-2007 , 2008 .

[4]  Joanna Burger,et al.  Jet aircraft noise and bird strikes: Why more birds are being hit , 1983 .

[5]  P. Marra,et al.  Frontiers inEcology and the Environment Migratory Canada geese cause crash of US Airways Flight 1549 , 2009 .

[6]  G. Key,et al.  Affordable avian radar surveillance systems for natural resource management and BASH applications , 2005, IEEE International Radar Conference, 2005..

[7]  R A Dolbeer Trends in Wildlife Strike Reporting, Part 1 - Voluntary System 1990-2008 , 2009 .

[8]  F. N. David,et al.  Principles and procedures of statistics. , 1961 .

[9]  R Richa,et al.  Safety management systems: how useful will the FAA National Wildlife Strike Database be? , 2009 .

[10]  T. Adam Kelly,et al.  THE AVIAN HAZARD ADVISORY SYSTEM (AHAS): OPERATIONAL USE OF WEATHER RADAR FOR REDUCING BIRD STRIKE RISK IN NORTH AMERICA , 2000 .

[11]  Paul F. Eschenfelder,et al.  Amplied Birdstrike Risk Related to Population Increases of Large Birds in North America , 2003 .

[12]  H. Robinson Principles and Procedures of Statistics , 1961 .

[13]  R. Dolbeer,et al.  Height Distribution of Birds Recorded by Collisions with Civil Aircraft , 2006 .

[14]  E. Fernández-Juricic,et al.  Wildlife collisions with aircraft: a missing component of land-use planning for airports. , 2009 .

[15]  Russell P. DeFusco CURRENT STATUS OF THE USAF BIRD AVOIDANCE MODEL (BAM) , 2000 .