Exploring the X-ray sky with the XMM-Newton bright serendipitous survey

We present here "The XMM-Newton Bright Serendipitous Survey", composed of two flux-limited samples: the XMM-Newton Bright Source Sample (BSS, hereafter) and the XMM-Newton "Hard" Bright Source Sample (HBSS, hereafter) having a flux limit of f(x) similar or equal to 7 x 10(-14) erg cm(-2) s(-1) in the 0.5-4.5 keV and 4.5-7.5 keV energy band, respectively. After discussing the main goals of this project and the survey strategy, we present the basic data on a complete sample of 400 X-ray sources (389 of them belong to the BSS, 67 to the HBSS with 56 X-ray sources in common) derived from the analysis of 237 suitable XMM-Newton fields (211 for the HBSS). At the flux limit of the survey we cover a survey area of 28.10 (25.17 for the HBSS) sq. deg. The extragalactic number-flux relationships (in the 0.5-4.5 keV and in the 4.5-7.5 keV energy bands) are in good agreement with previous and new results making us confident about the correctness of data selection and analysis. Up to now similar to71% (similar to90%) of the sources have been spectroscopically identified making the BSS (HBSS) the sample with the highest number of identified XMM-Newton sources published so far. At the X-ray flux limits of the sources studied here we found that: a) the optical counterpart in the majority (similar to90%) of cases has a magnitude brighter than the POSS II limit (R similar to 21(mag)); b) the majority of the objects identified so far are broad line AGN both in the BSS and in the HBSS. No obvious trend of the source spectra ( as deduced from the Hardness Ratios analysis) as a function of the count rate is measured and the average spectra of the "extragalactic" population corresponds to a (0.5-4.5 keV) energy spectral index of similar to0.8 (similar to0.64) for the BSS ( HBSS) sample. Based on the hardness ratios we infer that about 13% (40%) of the sources in the BSS ( HBSS) sample are described by an energy spectral index flatter than that of the cosmic X-ray background. Based on previous X-ray spectral results on a small subsample of objects we speculate that all these sources are indeed absorbed AGN with the N-H ranging from a few times 10(21) up to few times 10(23) cm(-2). We do not find strong evidence that the 4.5-7.5 keV survey is sampling a completely different source population if compared with the 0.5-4.5 keV survey; rather we find that, as expected from the CXB synthesis models, the hard survey is simply picking up a larger fraction of absorbed AGN. At the flux limit of the HBSS sample we measure surface densities of optically type 1 and type 2 AGN of 1.63 +/- 0.25 deg(-2) and 0.83 +/- 0.18 deg(-2), respectively; optically type 2 AGN represent 34 +/- 9% of the total AGN population. Finally, we have found a clear separation, in the hardness ratio diagram and in the (hardness ratio) vs. (X-ray to optical flux ratio) diagram, between Galactic "coronal emitting" stars and extragalactic sources. The information and "calibration" reported in this paper will make the existing and incoming XMM-Newton catalogs a unique resource for astrophysical studies.

[1]  I. Georgantopoulos,et al.  The X-ray spectra of optically selected Seyfert 2 galaxies: are there any Seyfert 2 galaxies with no absorption? , 2001, astro-ph/0104061.

[2]  D. M. Alexander,et al.  The Chandra Deep Field North Survey. XIII. 2 Ms Point-Source Catalogs , 2003, astro-ph/0304392.

[3]  Roberto Gilmozzi,et al.  The Chandra Deep Field-South: The 1 Million Second Exposure* , 2002 .

[4]  X. Barcons,et al.  H1320+551: a type 1.8/1.9 Seyfert galaxy with an unabsorbed X-ray spectrum , 2003 .

[5]  European Southern Observatory,et al.  XMM-Newton observation of the Lockman Hole - II. Spectral analysis , 2002, astro-ph/0207166.

[6]  J. Dickey,et al.  H I in the Galaxy , 1990 .

[7]  R. Narayan,et al.  On the Nature of X-Ray-Bright, Optically Normal Galaxies , 2004, astro-ph/0401117.

[8]  Kindler-Rohrborn,et al.  In press , 1994, Molecular carcinogenesis.

[9]  P. Ciliegi,et al.  The HELLAS2XMM survey - VI. X-ray absorption in the 1df AGN sample through a spectral analysis , 2004 .

[10]  Loredana Bassani,et al.  Unabsorbed Seyfert 2 galaxies , 2002 .

[11]  Takamitsu Miyaji,et al.  Cosmological Evolution of the Hard X-Ray Active Galactic Nucleus Luminosity Function and the Origin of the Hard X-Ray Background , 2003, astro-ph/0308140.

[12]  P. Ciliegi,et al.  The HELLAS2XMM survey IV. Optical identifications and the evolution of the accretion luminosity in the Universe , 2003, astro-ph/0306556.

[13]  D. M. Alexander,et al.  The Chandra Deep Field North Survey. V. 1 Ms Source Catalogs , 2001, astro-ph/0108404.

[14]  M. J. Page,et al.  The XMM-Newton HBS28 sample: Studying the obscuration in hard X-ray selected AGNs , , 2004 .

[15]  Astrophysics,et al.  The HELLAS2XMM Survey. I. The X-Ray Data and the log N-log S Relation , 2001, astro-ph/0108514.

[16]  L. Bassani,et al.  Exploring the spectral properties of faint hard X-ray sources with XMM Newton , 2002 .

[17]  P. Véron,et al.  A catalogue of quasars and active nuclei: 10th edition , 2001 .

[18]  Wolfgang Voges,et al.  The ROSAT Bright Survey: II. Catalogue of all high-galactic latitude RASS sources with PSPC countrate CR > 0.2 s -1 , 2000 .

[19]  G. Hasinger,et al.  Testing current synthesis models of the X-ray background , 2000, astro-ph/0011341.

[20]  G. Zamorani,et al.  The X-ray spectra of the extragalactic sources in the Einstein extended medium sensitivity survey , 1988 .

[21]  The XMM Newton/2dF Survey - IV. The X-ray spectral properties of the hard sources , 2004, astro-ph/0404048.

[22]  A. C. Fabian,et al.  The unified Seyfert scheme and the origin of the cosmic X-ray background , 1994 .

[23]  Takashi Ichikawa,et al.  GALAXY COLORS IN VARIOUS PHOTOMETRIC BAND SYSTEMS , 1995 .

[24]  M. J. Page,et al.  The XMM-Newton serendipitous survey: II. First results from the AXIS high galactic latitude medium sensitivity survey , 2002 .

[25]  R. Schild,et al.  The Einstein Observatory Extended Medium-Sensitivity Survey. I - X-ray data and analysis , 1990 .

[26]  R. Della Ceca,et al.  A Medium Survey of the Hard X-Ray Sky with ASCA. II. The Source's Broadband X-Ray Spectral Properties , 1999 .

[27]  James Liebert,et al.  A medium sensitivity X-ray survey using the Einstein Observatory - The log N-log S relation for extragalactic X-ray sources , 1982 .

[28]  Richard E. Griffiths,et al.  A ROSAT deep survey – VI. Active and passive X-ray galaxies , 1995 .

[29]  M. Mignoli,et al.  The HELLAS2XMM Survey. II. Multiwavelength Observations of P3: An X-Ray-bright, Optically Inactive Galaxy* , 2002, astro-ph/0202080.

[30]  G. C. Perola,et al.  The BeppoSAX High Energy Large Area Survey (HELLAS) – III. Testing synthesis models for the X‐ray background , 2001 .

[31]  F. Fiore,et al.  The BeppoSAX High Energy Large Area Survey (HELLAS) , 1998 .

[32]  Martin Elvis,et al.  Two optically dull galaxies with strong nuclear X-ray sources , 1981 .

[33]  S.Campana,et al.  The Resolved Fraction of the Cosmic X-Ray Background , 2003, astro-ph/0301555.

[34]  Germany,et al.  The classification of BL Lacertae objects: the Ca H&K break , 2002, astro-ph/0207075.

[35]  G. Di Cocco,et al.  An XMM-Newton study of the hard X-ray sky , 2003, astro-ph/0309606.