Recursive sequence generation in crows

Recursion, the process of embedding structures within similar structures, is often considered a foundation of symbolic competence and a uniquely human capability. To understand its evolution, we can study the recursive aptitudes of nonhuman animals. We adopted the behavioral protocol of a recent study demonstrating that humans and nonhuman primates grasp recursion. We presented sequences of bracket pair stimuli (e.g., [ ] and { }) to crows who were instructed to peck at training lists. They were then tested on their ability to transfer center-embedded structure to never-before-seen pairings of brackets. We reveal that crows have recursive capacities; they perform on par with children and even outperform macaques. The crows continued to produce recursive sequences after extending to longer and thus deeper embeddings. These results demonstrate that recursive capabilities are not limited to the primate genealogy and may have occurred separately from or before human symbolic competence in different animal taxa.

[1]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Symbols and mental programs: a hypothesis about human singularity , 2022, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Judith M Burkart,et al.  Nonadjacent dependency processing in monkeys, apes, and humans , 2020, Science Advances.

[3]  Jessica F. Cantlon,et al.  Recursive sequence generation in monkeys, children, U.S. adults, and native Amazonians , 2020, Science Advances.

[4]  Raphaëlle Malassis,et al.  Baboons (Papio papio) Process a Context-Free but Not a Context-Sensitive Grammar , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[5]  A. Nieder,et al.  A histological study of the song system of the carrion crow (Corvus corone) , 2021, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[6]  G. Striedter,et al.  Brains Through Time , 2019 .

[7]  Steffen R. Hage,et al.  Volitional control of vocalizations in corvid songbirds , 2019, PLoS biology.

[8]  David Barner,et al.  Ontogenetic Origins of Human Integer Representations , 2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  Jinook Oh,et al.  Common marmosets are sensitive to simple dependencies at variable distances in an artificial grammar , 2019, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

[10]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Spontaneous Learning of Visual Structures in Domestic Chicks , 2018, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[11]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Production of Supra-regular Spatial Sequences by Macaque Monkeys , 2018, Current Biology.

[12]  Fenna H. Poletiek,et al.  What baboons can (not) tell us about natural language grammars , 2016, Cognition.

[13]  T. Bugnyar,et al.  Cognition without Cortex , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  W. Fitch,et al.  More than one way to see it: Individual heuristics in avian visual computation , 2015, Cognition.

[15]  Helen M. Ditz,et al.  Neurons selective to the number of visual items in the corvid songbird endbrain , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Anna Smirnova,et al.  Crows Spontaneously Exhibit Analogical Reasoning , 2015, Current Biology.

[17]  Alan D Baddeley,et al.  Memory for serial order across domains: An overview of the literature and directions for future research. , 2014, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  Abstract rule neurons in the endbrain support intelligent behaviour in corvid songbirds , 2013, Nature Communications.

[19]  A. Rey,et al.  Centre-embedded structures are a by-product of associative learning and working memory constraints: Evidence from baboons (Papio Papio) , 2012, Cognition.

[20]  S. Sugita,et al.  Quantity discrimination in jungle crows, Corvus macrorhynchos , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  Kentaro Abe,et al.  Songbirds possess the spontaneous ability to discriminate syntactic rules , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  C. Scharff,et al.  Twitter evolution: converging mechanisms in birdsong and human speech , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[23]  Willem H. Zuidema,et al.  Simple rules can explain discrimination of putative recursive syntactic structures by a songbird species , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  R. Heathcote,et al.  The Role of Experience in Problem Solving and Innovative Tool Use in Crows , 2009, Current Biology.

[25]  A. Nieder Prefrontal cortex and the evolution of symbolic reference , 2009, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[26]  Pienie Zwitserlood,et al.  Syntactic structure and artificial grammar learning: The learnability of embedded hierarchical structures , 2008, Cognition.

[27]  Susan Carey,et al.  One, two, three, four, nothing more: An investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal counting principles , 2007, Cognition.

[28]  Alex H. Taylor,et al.  Spontaneous Metatool Use by New Caledonian Crows , 2007, Current Biology.

[29]  Michael C. Corballis,et al.  Recursion, Language, and Starlings , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[30]  Timothy Q. Gentner,et al.  Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds , 2006, Nature.

[31]  S. Pinker,et al.  The faculty of language: what's special about it? , 2005, Cognition.

[32]  Gerald E. Hough,et al.  Avian brains and a new understanding of vertebrate brain evolution , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[33]  W. Fitch,et al.  Computational Constraints on Syntactic Processing in a Nonhuman Primate , 2004, Science.

[34]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002, Science.

[35]  G. Hunt Manufacture and use of hook-tools by New Caledonian crows , 1996, Nature.

[36]  Herbert S. Terrace,et al.  Memory and Representation of Serial Order by Children, Monkeys, and Pigeons , 1994 .

[37]  M. Colombo,et al.  Serial learning with wild card items by monkeys (Cebus apella): implications for knowledge of ordinal position. , 1989, Journal of comparative psychology.

[38]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[39]  M. Braine,et al.  Short-term memory limitations on decoding self-embedded sentences , 1974 .