Variation of clinical target volume definition among Japanese radiation oncologists in external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND We investigated the interobserver variation in the prostate target volume and the trend toward the use of diagnostic computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) images for treatment planning. METHODS Twenty-five radiation oncologists were asked to draw the external contour of the prostate on CT images (0.3 cm spacing) of a patient with localized prostate cancer. They also answered a questionnaire regarding the use of diagnostic CT or MR images for the contouring. RESULTS Of the 25 physicians, 28% rarely or never referred to the diagnostic CT images. In contrast, the physicians tended to refer to the MR images more frequently. Approximately 50% of the physicians believed in the usefulness of contrast-enhanced images for the delineation of the prostate. As for the variation of the prostate contouring, the median craniocaudal prostate length was 36 mm (range, 21-54 mm), and the median prostate volume was 43.5 cm(3) (range, 23.8-98.3 cm(3)). The interobserver variability was not significant in the duration as a radiation oncologist, the board certification status as radiation oncologists, and the number of treatment plans developed for prostate cancer during the last 1 year. CONCLUSION A wide variety of the definitions of the prostate was found among Japanese radiation oncologists.

[1]  M. Parmar,et al.  Escalated-dose versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: first results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial. , 2007, The Lancet. Oncology.

[2]  G T Chen,et al.  Tumor and target delineation: current research and future challenges. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  R. Steenbakkers,et al.  Reduction of dose delivered to the rectum and bulb of the penis using MRI delineation for radiotherapy of the prostate. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  H. Hricak,et al.  Prostate volumes defined by magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomographic scans for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  S. Zhou,et al.  Differences in gross target volumes on contrast vs. noncontrast CT scans utilized for conformal radiation therapy treatment planning for prostate carcinoma. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  H. Onishi,et al.  Radical external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer in Japan: changing trends in the patterns of care process survey between 1996-1998 and 1999-2001. , 2005, Anticancer research.

[7]  M. Koizumi,et al.  Radical external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer in Japan: preliminary results of the 1999-2001 patterns of care process survey. , 2004, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[8]  H. Onishi,et al.  Radical external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer in Japan: results of the 1999-2001 patterns of care process survey. , 2006, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[9]  B W Corn,et al.  Variation of clinical target volume definition in three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  M van Herk,et al.  Definition of the prostate in CT and MRI: a multi-observer study. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  Daniel W. Miller,et al.  Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a randomized controlled trial. , 2005, JAMA.

[12]  M. Koizumi,et al.  Trends in the practice of radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer in Japan: a preliminary patterns of care study report. , 2003, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[13]  E Bellon,et al.  The contribution of magnetic resonance imaging to the three-dimensional treatment planning of localized prostate cancer. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  V. Khoo,et al.  Do differences in target volume definition in prostate cancer lead to clinically relevant differences in normal tissue toxicity? , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.