8.5/8.6-mm Excimer Laser-Assisted Penetrating Keratoplasties in a Tertiary Corneal Subspecialty Referral Center: Indications and Outcomes in 107 Eyes.

PURPOSE To report the indications and outcomes of 8.5/8.6-mm excimer laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasties (PKPs) at a tertiary corneal subspecialty referral center. METHODS This retrospective, descriptive, observational study included 107 PKPs performed in 96 patients (mean age, 53 ± 12 years). The patients' indications for surgery, best-corrected visual acuity, surface regularity index, surface asymmetry index, topographic astigmatism, central endothelial cell density, central corneal thickness, and graft status were recorded preoperatively, 6 weeks postoperatively, and before (12 ± 2 months) and after (19 ± 4 months) the suture removal. RESULTS The surgeries included 48 primary PKPs and 59 repeat PKPs. The main indications were corneal ectatic disorders (50%), severe corneal keratitis (21%), and corneal scars (16%) in the primary PKP group and highly irregular astigmatism after PKP (51%) and previous graft decompensation (37%) in the repeat PKP group. From preoperative measurements to the last follow-up visit without sutures, we found significant improvements (P < 0.001 for all) in visual acuity (0.7 ± 0.3 LogMAR to 0.3 ± 0.2 LogMAR), surface regularity index (1.5-1.0), and surface asymmetry index (2.59-1.1). At the last follow-up, the mean outcome measurements did not significantly differ between the primary and repeat PKP groups. Overall, 89 grafts (83%) remained clear at the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS In cases of ectatic disorders and highly irregular astigmatism after keratoplasty, 8.5/8.6-mm excimer laser-assisted PKP seems to be an excellent treatment option, achieving a significant improvement in visual acuity.

[1]  B. Seitz,et al.  Comparison of Excimer Laser Versus Femtosecond Laser Assisted Trephination in Penetrating Keratoplasty: A Retrospective Study , 2019, Advances in Therapy.

[2]  B. Seitz,et al.  Early Penetrating Keratoplasty À Chaud May Improve Outcome in Therapy-Resistant Acanthamoeba Keratitis , 2019, Advances in Therapy.

[3]  B. Seitz,et al.  Endothelial cell density and corneal graft thickness following excimer laser vs. femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty—a prospective randomized study , 2019, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[4]  B. Seitz,et al.  Trends in Corneal Transplantation from 2001 to 2016 in Germany: A Report of the DOG-Section Cornea and its Keratoplasty Registry. , 2018, American journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  B. Seitz,et al.  Reconsidering Sequential Double Running Suture Removal After Penetrating Keratoplasty: A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Excimer Laser and Motor Trephination , 2017, Cornea.

[6]  B. Seitz,et al.  Penetrating Keratoplasty for Keratoconus – Excimer Versus Femtosecond Laser Trephination , 2017, The open ophthalmology journal.

[7]  B. Seitz,et al.  [PKP for Keratoconus - From Hand/Motor Trephine to Excimer Laser and Back to Femtosecond Laser]. , 2016, Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde.

[8]  B. Seitz,et al.  The Penetrating Keratoplasty (PKP): A Century of Success , 2016 .

[9]  E. Pels,et al.  Endothelial cell loss and visual outcome of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty: a randomized multicenter clinical trial. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[10]  S. Hannush.  Preoperative Considerations and Decision-Making in Keratoplasty , 2011 .

[11]  E. Holland,et al.  Large-Diameter Penetrating Keratoplasty: Indications and Outcomes , 2010, Cornea.

[12]  B. Seitz,et al.  Intra-individual variability of penetrating keratoplasty outcome after excimer laser versus motorized corneal trephination. , 2006, Journal of refractive surgery.

[13]  M. B. Goren.  The Eye Bank Association of America. , 2006, Comprehensive ophthalmology update.

[14]  H. D. Cavanagh,et al.  Results of penetrating keratoplasty for visual rehabilitation after Acanthamoeba keratitis. , 2005, American journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  B. Seitz,et al.  Repeat keratoplasty for correction of high or irregular postkeratoplasty astigmatism in clear corneal grafts. , 2005, American journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  P. Hamrah.  High-risk penetrating keratoplasty. , 2005, Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia.

[17]  B. Seitz,et al.  Impact of graft diameter on corneal power and the regularity of postkeratoplasty astigmatism before and after suture removal. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[18]  B. Seitz,et al.  Corneal endothelial cell loss after nonmechanical penetrating keratoplasty depends on diagnosis: a regression analysis , 2002, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[19]  B. Seitz,et al.  [Corneal dimensions in various types of corneal dystrophies and their effect on penetrating keratoplasty]. , 2000, Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde.

[20]  B. Seitz,et al.  Nonmechanical corneal trephination with the excimer laser improves outcome after penetrating keratoplasty. , 1999, Ophthalmology.

[21]  P. Laibson,et al.  Long‐term survival of large diameter penetrating keratoplasties for keratoconus and pellucid marginal degeneration , 1989, Acta ophthalmologica. Supplement.