Symbolic power and the internet: The power of a ‘horse’

It is a common perception that as long as people have the resources to access the internet, they are in a position to make their voice heard. In reality, however, it is obvious that the vast majority of internet users are not really able to make themselves ‘visible’ and that their concerns receive little attention. Thus, it is more accurate to suggest that the internet offers ordinary people the potential of this power. Under what conditions can this potential be realized and what are the associated implications? Drawing upon the concept of symbolic power, and utilizing a recent example from China, this article addresses these often overlooked questions. It shows that it is not easy to materialize the potential of symbolic power on the internet. What the internet makes easy is to produce follow-up discourse once a powerful symbol has appeared. With the aid of supporters and their follow-up discourses, the symbol creates a symbolic network and takes roots in the society quickly and deeply. Finally, some thoughts on symbolic power in the context of China are also provided in the framework of discourse and social change.

[1]  Xiao Qiang,et al.  Political Expression in the Chinese Blogosphere: Below the Radar , 2008 .

[2]  Xiang Zhou,et al.  The political blogosphere in China: A content analysis of the blogs regarding the dismissal of Shanghai leader Chen Liangyu , 2009, New Media Soc..

[3]  Norman Fairclough,et al.  Language and Neo-Liberalism , 2000 .

[4]  Colin Sparks,et al.  INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM IN CHINA TODAY , 2009 .

[5]  Norman Fairclough,et al.  Language in New Capitalism , 2002 .

[6]  Rebecca MacKinnon.  Flatter world and thicker walls? Blogs, censorship and civic discourse in China , 2007 .

[7]  Guobin Yang.  The Internet as Cultural Form: Technology and the Human Condition in China , 2009 .

[8]  Andrew Morrison,et al.  A Discourse of Disillusionment: Letters to the Editor in Two Zimbabwean Magazines 10 Years after Independence , 1996 .

[9]  Guobin Yang,et al.  China Since Tiananmen: Online Activism , 2009 .

[10]  Guobin Yang,et al.  The Co-evolution of the Internet and Civil Society in China , 2003 .

[11]  Xing Lu,et al.  An Ideological/Cultural Analysis of Political Slogans in Communist China , 1999 .

[12]  Liu Lihua,et al.  Discourse construction of social power: interpersonal rhetoric in editorials of the China Daily , 2009 .

[13]  Lokman Tsui,et al.  The Panopticon as the Antithesis of a Space of Freedom , 2003 .

[14]  Yong Zhong,et al.  CCTV ‘dialogue’ = speaking + listening: a case analysis of a prestigious CCTV talk show series Dialogue , 2004 .

[15]  Xin Wang,et al.  Seeking Channels for Engagement: Media Use and Political Communication by China's Rising Middle Class , 2009, China: An International Journal.

[16]  J. Thompson,et al.  The New Visibility , 2005 .

[17]  Ning Wang,et al.  Online network size, efficacy, and opinion expression: Assessing the impacts of internet use in China , 2009 .

[18]  Philip W. Graham,et al.  Hypercapitalism: language, new media and social perceptions of value , 2002 .

[19]  Randolph Kluver,et al.  The Internet in nine Asian nations , 2005 .

[20]  Guobin Yang,et al.  The Internet and Civil Society in China: A preliminary assessment , 2003 .

[21]  Mark Deuze,et al.  The Web and its Journalisms: Considering the Consequences of Different Types of Newsmedia Online , 2003, New Media Soc..

[22]  Haiqing Yu,et al.  Blogging Everyday Life in Chinese Internet Culture , 2007 .

[23]  Jingrong Tong,et al.  Press self-censorship in China: a case study in the transformation of discourse , 2009 .

[24]  Shaojung Sharon Wang,et al.  Discourse behind the Forbidden Realm: Internet surveillance and its implications on China's blogosphere , 2010, Telematics Informatics.