Cardiac resynchronisation therapy in chronic atrial fibrillation: impact on left atrial size and reversal to sinus rhythm

Objective: To evaluate the impact of long term cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) on left atrial and left ventricular (LV) reverse remodelling and reversal to sinus rhythm (SR) in patients with heart failure with atrial fibrillation (AF). Patients: 74 consecutive patients (age 68 (8) years; 67 men) with advanced heart failure and AF (20 persistent and 54 permanent) were implanted with a CRT device. Main outcome measures: Patients were evaluated clinically (New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, quality of life, six minute walk test) and echocardiographically (LV ejection fraction, LV diameters, and left atrial diameters) before and after six months of CRT. Additionally, restoration of SR was evaluated after six months of CRT. Results: NYHA class, quality of life score, six minute walk test, and LV ejection fraction had improved significantly after six months of CRT. In addition, left atrial and LV end diastolic and end systolic diameters had decreased from 59 (9) to 55 (9) mm, from 72 (10) to 67 (10) mm, and from 61 (11) to 56 (11) mm, respectively (all p < 0.01). During implantation 18 of 20 (90%) patients with persistent AF were cardioverted to SR. At follow up 13 of 18 (72%) patients had returned to AF and none had spontaneously reverted to SR; thus, only 5 of 74 (7%) were in SR. Conclusion: Six months of CRT resulted in significant clinical benefit with significant left atrial and LV reverse remodelling. Despite these beneficial effects, 93% of patients had not reverted to SR.

[1]  N. Reichek,et al.  Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. , 1989, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[2]  K. Swedberg,et al.  Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure: results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS). , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  Stefan Sack,et al.  Long-term clinical effect of hemodynamically optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and ventricular conduction delay. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  Milton Packer,et al.  Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Prashanthan Sanders,et al.  Electrical Remodeling of the Atria in Congestive Heart Failure: Electrophysiological and Electroanatomic Mapping in Humans , 2003, Circulation.

[6]  J. Cohn,et al.  Validity of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire as a measure of therapeutic response to enalapril or placebo. , 1993, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  W. Kim,et al.  Three dimensional echocardiography documents haemodynamic improvement by biventricular pacing in patients with severe heart failure , 2001, Heart.

[8]  S. Nattel,et al.  Dissociation Between Ionic Remodeling and Ability to Sustain Atrial Fibrillation During Recovery From Experimental Congestive Heart Failure , 2004, Circulation.

[9]  M A Waclawiw,et al.  Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk for mortality and heart failure progression in patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a retrospective analysis of the SOLVD trials. Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  R A Levine,et al.  Insights from three-dimensional echocardiography into the mechanism of functional mitral regurgitation: direct in vivo demonstration of altered leaflet tethering geometry. , 1997, Circulation.

[11]  J. Daubert,et al.  Left ventricular remodelling and haemodynamic effects of multisite biventricular pacing in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and activation disturbances in sinus rhythm: sub-study of the MUSTIC (Multisite Stimulationin Cardiomyopathies) trial. , 2003, European heart journal.

[12]  N. Kanuru,et al.  Cardiac resynchronization in patients with congestive heart failure and chronic atrial fibrillation: effect of upgrading to biventricular pacing after chronic right ventricular pacing. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Comparison of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with sinus rhythm versus chronic atrial fibrillation. , 2004, The American journal of cardiology.

[14]  S. Heinle,et al.  Doppler echocardiographic assessment of mitral regurgitation. , 2000, Coronary artery disease.

[15]  A. DeMaria,et al.  Recommendations Regarding Quantitation in M-Mode Echocardiography: Results of a Survey of Echocardiographic Measurements , 1978, Circulation.

[16]  J. Mcanulty,et al.  Reversal of Electrical Remodeling After Cardioversion of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation , 2004, Cardiovascular Electrophysiology.

[17]  M. Allessie,et al.  Atrial fibrillation begets atrial fibrillation. A study in awake chronically instrumented goats. , 1995, Circulation.

[18]  Chu-Pak Lau,et al.  Tissue Doppler Echocardiographic Evidence of Reverse Remodeling and Improved Synchronicity by Simultaneously Delaying Regional Contraction After Biventricular Pacing Therapy in Heart Failure , 2002, Circulation.

[19]  K. Malinowski.  Spontaneous Conversion of Permanent Atrial Fibrillation into Stable Sinus Rhythm After 17 Months of Biventricular Pacing , 2003, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[20]  Thomas Lavergne,et al.  Long-term benefits of biventricular pacing in congestive heart failure: results from the MUltisite STimulation in cardiomyopathy (MUSTIC) study. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  T. Şahin,et al.  Effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy on left atrial reverse remodeling and spontaneous echo contrast. , 2004, The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine.

[22]  P. Vardas,et al.  Left ventricular mechanics during right ventricular apical or left ventricular-based pacing in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation after atrioventricular junction ablation. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  J. Daubert,et al.  Electrocardiographic predictive factors of long-term clinical improvement with multisite biventricular pacing in advanced heart failure. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[24]  E. Aliot,et al.  Catheter ablation or modulation of the AV node. , 2002, Cardiac electrophysiology review.

[25]  D. Delurgio,et al.  Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  S Nattel,et al.  Promotion of atrial fibrillation by heart failure in dogs: atrial remodeling of a different sort. , 1999, Circulation.

[27]  N. Bayley,et al.  Failure , 1890, The Hospital.

[28]  J. Daubert,et al.  Comparative effects of permanent biventricular and right-univentricular pacing in heart failure patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. , 2002, European heart journal.

[29]  A. Costard-Jäckle.  [Atrial fibrillation in heart failure]. , 2002, Herz.

[30]  P A Poole-Wilson,et al.  Six minute walking test for assessing exercise capacity in chronic heart failure. , 1986, British medical journal.

[31]  J. Indik.  Spontaneous conversion of atrial fibrillation in the setting of biventricular pacing. , 2004, Cardiology in Review.

[32]  Richard Sutton,et al.  International consensus on nomenclature and classification of atrial fibrillation: A collaborative project of the Working Group on Arrhythmias and the Working Group of Cardiac Pacing of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. , 2003, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.