A Multicenter, Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Dose-Finding Trial of the Oral Factor XIa Inhibitor Asundexian to Prevent Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Background: Oral activated factor XI (FXIa) inhibitors may modulate coagulation to prevent thromboembolic events without substantially increasing bleeding. We explored the pharmacodynamics, safety, and efficacy of the oral FXIa inhibitor asundexian for secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction (MI). Methods: We randomized 1601 patients with recent acute MI to oral asundexian 10, 20, or 50 mg or placebo once daily for 6 to 12 months in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2, dose-ranging trial. Patients were randomized within 5 days of their qualifying MI and received dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor. The effect of asundexian on FXIa inhibition was assessed at 4 weeks. The prespecified main safety outcome was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding comparing all pooled asundexian doses with placebo. The prespecified efficacy outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, or stent thrombosis comparing pooled asundexian 20 and 50 mg doses with placebo. Results: The median age was 68 years, 23% of participants were women, 51% had ST-segment–elevation MI, 80% were treated with aspirin plus ticagrelor or prasugrel, and 99% underwent percutaneous coronary intervention before randomization. Asundexian caused dose-related inhibition of FXIa activity, with 50 mg resulting in >90% inhibition. Over a median follow-up of 368 days, the main safety outcome occurred in 30 (7.6%), 32 (8.1%), 42 (10.5%), and 36 (9.0%) patients receiving asundexian 10 mg, 20 mg, or 50 mg, or placebo, respectively (pooled asundexian versus placebo: hazard ratio, 0.98 [90% CI, 0.71–1.35]). The efficacy outcome occurred in 27 (6.8%), 24 (6.0%), 22 (5.5%), and 22 (5.5%) patients assigned asundexian 10 mg, 20 mg, or 50 mg, or placebo, respectively (pooled asundexian 20 and 50 mg versus placebo: hazard ratio, 1.05 [90% CI, 0.69–1.61]). Conclusions: In patients with recent acute MI, 3 doses of asundexian, when added to aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor, resulted in dose-dependent, near-complete inhibition of FXIa activity without a significant increase in bleeding and a low rate of ischemic events. These data support the investigation of asundexian at a dose of 50 mg daily in an adequately powered clinical trial of patients who experienced acute MI. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04304534; URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search; Unique identifier: 2019-003244-79.

[1]  Jan van den Berg,et al.  Safety of the oral factor XIa inhibitor asundexian compared with apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation (PACIFIC-AF): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, dose-finding phase 2 study. , 2022, Lancet.

[2]  V. Laux,et al.  Pharmacological profile of asundexian, a novel, orally bioavailable inhibitor of factor XIa , 2022, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[3]  D. Kubitza,et al.  Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of BAY 2433334, a novel activated factor XI inhibitor, in healthy volunteers: A randomized phase 1 multiple‐dose study , 2022, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[4]  G. Raskob,et al.  Milvexian for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism. , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  G. Raskob,et al.  Abelacimab for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism. , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Mortality Benefit of Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin in Patients With Chronic Coronary or Peripheral Artery Disease. , 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  A. Yassen,et al.  First evaluation of the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of BAY 2433334, a small molecule targeting coagulation factor XIa , 2021, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[8]  G. Raskob,et al.  Effect of Osocimab in Preventing Venous Thromboembolism Among Patients Undergoing Knee Arthroplasty: The FOXTROT Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2020, JAMA.

[9]  Yaiza Beatriz Molero-Díez,et al.  Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction , 2019, Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology.

[10]  J. Spertus,et al.  Standardized End Point Definitions for Coronary Intervention Trials: The Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus Document , 2018, European heart journal.

[11]  G. Hindricks,et al.  2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). , 2018, European heart journal.

[12]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Rivaroxaban with or without Aspirin in Stable Cardiovascular Disease , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Claudia Schmoor,et al.  Statistical issues in the analysis of adverse events in time‐to‐event data , 2016, Pharmaceutical statistics.

[14]  G. Raskob,et al.  Factor XI antisense oligonucleotide for prevention of venous thrombosis. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  E. Tuzcu,et al.  Stent Thrombosis With Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Compared With Bare-Metal Stents: Network Meta-Analysis of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Trials in ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[16]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Reduction of stent thrombosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with rivaroxaban in ATLAS-ACS 2 TIMI 51. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  Paul Burton,et al.  Rivaroxaban in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  F. Van de Werf,et al.  Dabigatran vs. placebo in patients with acute coronary syndromes on dual antiplatelet therapy: a randomized, double-blind, phase II trial. , 2011, European heart journal.

[19]  G. Lip,et al.  RUBY-1: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the safety and tolerability of the novel oral factor Xa inhibitor darexaban (YM150) following acute coronary syndrome , 2011, European heart journal.

[20]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Apixaban with antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  Standardized Bleeding Definitions for Cardiovascular Clinical Trials: A Consensus Report From the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium , 2011, Circulation.

[22]  Claes Held,et al.  Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Strategies to reduce bleeding among patients with ischemic heart disease treated with antiplatelet therapies. , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.

[24]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Improving clinical outcomes by reducing bleeding in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. , 2008, European heart journal.

[25]  H. White,et al.  Impact of major bleeding on 30-day mortality and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes: an analysis from the ACUITY Trial. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  Sin-Ho Jung,et al.  Sample Size Computation for Two-Sample Noninferiority Log-Rank Test , 2005, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[27]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2013, Circulation.

[28]  P. R. R. Ecurrent,et al.  EFFECTS OF CLOPIDOGREL IN ADDITION TO ASPIRIN IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES WITHOUT ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION , 2001 .