Strategic influence on the time course of predictive inferences in reading

In the present study, we investigated how reading strategies affect the time course of online predictive inferences. Participants read sentences under instructions either to anticipate the outcomes of described events or to understand the sentences. These were followed by a target word to be named, with stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) of 500 or 1,000 msec (50- or 550-msec interstimulus interval, respectively). Sentences either were predictive of events or were lexically matched control sentences. There was facilitation in naming latencies for predictable target words in the strategic-anticipation condition at both SOAs, but not in the read-to-understand condition, with a significant improvement in the former condition in comparison with the latter. This suggests that predictive inferences, which are typically considered to be resource demanding, can be speeded up by specific goals in reading. Moreover, this can occur at no cost to comprehension of explicit information, as was revealed by a comprehension test.

[1]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Minimal or Global Inference during Reading , 1994 .

[2]  M Carreiras,et al.  Inferences about predictable events: eye movements during reading , 2001, Psychological research.

[3]  Edward J. O’Brien,et al.  Character profiles and the activation of predictive inferences , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[4]  Jerome L. Myers,et al.  Accessing the discourse representation during reading , 1998 .

[5]  Manuel G. Calvo,et al.  Predictive inferences occur on‐line, but with delay: Convergence of naming and reading times , 1996 .

[6]  G. R. Potts,et al.  Assessing the occurrence of elaborative inferences: Lexical decision versus naming , 1988 .

[7]  Debra L. Long,et al.  Individual differences in the time course of inferential processing. , 1994 .

[8]  J. D. Murray,et al.  Forward Inferences in Narrative Text , 1993 .

[9]  Franz Schmalhofer,et al.  What is minimal about predictive inferences? , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. , 1994 .

[11]  Jonathan M. Golding,et al.  Methodological Issues In Evaluating The Occurrence of Inferences , 1990 .

[12]  Franz Schmalhofer,et al.  A Unified Model for Predictive and Bridging Inferences , 2002 .

[13]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[14]  G. McKoon,et al.  The readiness is all: The functionality of memory‐based text processing , 1998 .

[15]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Inference during reading. , 1992 .

[16]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Time course of priming for associate and inference words in a discourse context , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[17]  M. Castillo,et al.  On-line predictive inferences in reading: Processing timeduring versusafter the priming context , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[18]  Rebecca Fincher-Kiefer,et al.  Encoding differences between bridging and predictive inferences , 1996 .

[19]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  The time course of generating causal antecedent and causal consequence inferences , 1993 .

[20]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  The time course and durability of predictive inferences , 1993 .

[21]  P. Broek.  The causal inference maker: Towards a process model of inference generation in text comprehension. , 1990 .

[22]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Inferences about predictable events. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  Manuel G. Calvo,et al.  Predictive inferences take time to develop , 1998 .

[24]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Situation models in language comprehension and memory. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  Celia M. Klin,et al.  Prevalence and persistence of predictive inferences , 1999 .

[26]  W. Kintsch.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.

[27]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Strategic processing during comprehension. , 1999 .

[28]  Edward J. O'Brien,et al.  Situation-Based Context and the Availability of Predictive Inferences , 2001 .

[29]  Manuel G. Calvo,et al.  Bias in Predictive Inferences During Reading , 2001 .

[30]  Jean-Pierre Rossi,et al.  Associative and Causal Constraints in the Process of Generating Predictive Inferences , 2001 .

[31]  Rebecca Fincher-Kiefer,et al.  RELATIVE INHIBITION FOLLOWING THE ENCODING OF BRIDGING AND PREDICTIVE INFERENCES , 1995 .

[32]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  The Time-Course of Constructing Knowledge-Based Inferences for Scientific Texts , 1994 .

[33]  J. D. Murray,et al.  Forward Inferences: From Activation to Long-Term Memory. , 1999 .

[34]  Manuel G. Calvo,et al.  The time course of predictive inferences depends on contextual constraints , 2000 .

[35]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  Conscious understanding during comprehension , 1996 .

[36]  David A. Balota.  Comprehension Processes in Reading. , 1990 .

[37]  S A Duffy,et al.  Role of expectations in sentence integration. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[38]  Jerome L Myers,et al.  Do readers make inferences about conversational topics? , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[39]  P. Whitney,et al.  The effect of foregrounding on readers’ use of predictive inferences , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[40]  Robert F. Lorch,et al.  The effects of readers’ goals on inference generation and memory for texts , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[41]  Celia M. Klin,et al.  When Throwing a Vase Has Multiple Consequences: Minimal Encoding of Predictive Inferencest , 2003 .