‚Mirroring‘ the Ethics of Biobanking: What Analysis of Consent Documents Can Tell Us?

Biobanks have been recognized as a key research infrastructure and how to approach ethical questions has been a topic of discussion for at least a decade by now. This article explores the characteristics of donors’ participation in European biobanks as reflected in the consent documents of a selection of different biobanks from various European countries. The primary aim of this study is to understand how donors are informed about their participation in biobanking. Also the paper discusses what the most important thematic issues of information are to be given to the biobank participants and how this information should be presented in the consent documents. For these purposes, we analyse consent documents from 14 biobanks in 11 countries for six ethically relevant issues: (1) model of consent, (2) scope of future research, (3) access to medical data, (4) feedback to the participants, (5) consent withdrawal, and (6) role of research ethics committee. In order to compare different trends of informing donors of human biological material and medical data, we interpret the six analysed issues in the context of respect to donor’s autonomy paradigm. Although the results of the paper reflect the heterogeneity of biobank consent document policies applied in different European countries, we uncovered some trends and suggested several examples of good practices to balance the interests of the donors with those of the researchers and future patients. S. Jurate (&) G. Eugenijus Department of Medical History and Ethics, Vilnius University, M.K. Ciurlionio St. 21/27, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania e-mail: jurate.serepkaite@gmail.com G. Eugenijus e-mail: eugenijus.gefenas@mf.vu.lt V. Zivile Department of Cardiology, Hospital of Lithuanian, University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania e-mail: zivile.burneikaite@gmail.com 123 Sci Eng Ethics (2014) 20:1079–1093 DOI 10.1007/s11948-013-9481-0

[1]  B. Knoppers,et al.  The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives , 2006, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[2]  Ruth Chadwick,et al.  Solidarity and equity: new ethical frameworks for genetic databases , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[3]  Fay Betsou,et al.  Biobanking for better healthcare , 2008, Molecular oncology.

[4]  Bartha Maria Knoppers,et al.  Human Genetic Research: Emerging Trends in Ethics , 2006 .

[5]  Jean-Raymond Abrial,et al.  On B , 1998, B.

[6]  R. Mohler TIME Magazine on “10 Ideas Changing the World Right Now” , 2009 .

[7]  J Ludvigsson,et al.  How to handle informed consent in longitudinal studies when participants have a limited understanding of the study , 2005, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[8]  J. Robert,et al.  Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants , 2008, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[9]  E. Gefenas,et al.  Research on Human Biological Materials: What Consent Is Needed, and When , 2011 .

[10]  K. Hoeyer Donors Perceptions of Consent to and Feedback from Biobank Research: Time to Acknowledge Diversity? , 2009, Public Health Genomics.

[11]  Edwin Cuppen,et al.  Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered. , 2011, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[12]  A. Ackerman,et al.  Opinion: No , 2016, International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology.

[13]  K. Brothers,et al.  Biobanking in pediatrics: the human nonsubjects approach. , 2011, Personalized medicine.