Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Noninvasive Detection of Stenosis in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts and Recipient Coronary Arteries

Background—Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a potential noninvasive diagnostic tool to detect coronary artery bypass graft stenosis, but its value in clinical practice remains to be established. We investigated the value of MRI in detecting stenotic grafts, including recipient vessels. Methods and Results—We screened for inclusion 173 consecutive patients who were scheduled for coronary angiography because of recurrent chest pain after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We studied 69 eligible patients with 166 grafts (81 single vein, 44 sequential vein, and 41 arterial grafts). MRI with baseline and stress flow mapping was performed. Both scans were successful in 80% of grafts. Grafts were divided into groups with stenosis ≥50% (n=72) and ≥70% (n=48) in the graft or recipient vessels. Marginal logistic regression was used to predict the probability for the presence of stenosis per graft type using multiple MRI variables. Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic value of MRI. Sensitivity (95% confidence interval)/specificity (95% confidence interval) in detecting single vein grafts with stenosis ≥50% and ≥70% were 94% (86 to 100)/63% (48 to 79) and 96% (87 to 100)/92% (84 to 100), respectively. Conclusions—MRI with flow mapping is useful for identifying grafts and recipient vessels with flow-limiting stenosis. Flow scans could be obtained in 80% of the grafts. This proof-of-concept study suggests that noninvasive MRI detection of stenotic grafts in patients who present with recurrent chest pain after CABG may be useful in selecting those in need of an invasive procedure.

[1]  A. Zwinderman,et al.  MR flow mapping in coronary artery bypass grafts: a validation study with Doppler flow measurements. , 2002, Radiology.

[2]  K. Gould,et al.  Coronary flow reserve as a physiologic measure of stenosis severity. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  R. Edelman,et al.  A preliminary report comparing magnetic resonance coronary angiography with conventional angiography. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  D. Pennell Pharmacological cardiac stress: when and how? , 1994, Nuclear medicine communications.

[5]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[6]  E. Wellnhofer,et al.  Noninvasive determination of coronary blood flow velocity with magnetic resonance imaging: Comparison of breath‐hold and navigator techniques with intravascular ultrasound , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  No difference in cardiac event-free survival between positron emission tomography-guided and single-photon emission computed tomography-guided patient management: a prospective, randomized comparison of patients with suspicion of jeopardized myocardium. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  M. Omata,et al.  Impaired myocardial vasodilation during hyperemic stress with dipyridamole in hypertriglyceridemia. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  C. Visser,et al.  Value of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing patency and function of coronary artery bypass grafts. An angiographically controlled study. , 1996, Circulation.

[10]  E. E. van der Wall,et al.  Gated single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial imaging: a new tool in clinical cardiology. , 2001, American heart journal.

[11]  C. Higgins,et al.  Coronary flow reserve: noninvasive measurement in humans with breath-hold velocity-encoded cine MR imaging. , 1996, Radiology.

[12]  C. Higgins,et al.  Coronary artery bypass graft patency: noninvasive evaluation with MR imaging. , 1987, Radiology.

[13]  K Y Liang,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. , 1986, Biometrics.

[14]  Pennell Dj Pharmacological cardiac stress: when and how? , 1994 .

[15]  A. Zeiher,et al.  Long-term cigarette smoking impairs endothelium-dependent coronary arterial vasodilator function. , 1995, Circulation.

[16]  D. Jewitt,et al.  Manual of Otolaryngology , 1969 .

[17]  C. White,et al.  Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  J. Viikari,et al.  Early impairment of coronary flow reserve in young men with borderline hypertension. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  Y. Yamada,et al.  [Evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts with magnetic resonance imaging]. , 1997, [Zasshi] [Journal]. Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai.

[20]  R. Mccoll,et al.  Assessment of coronary arterial flow and flow reserve in humans with magnetic resonance imaging. , 1996, Circulation.

[21]  T Shimono,et al.  Mr flow measurement in the internal mammary artery-to-coronary artery bypass graft: comparison with graft stenosis at radiographic angiography. , 2001, Radiology.

[22]  D A Clark,et al.  Cardiac catheterization 1990: a report of the Registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions (SCA&I). , 1991, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[23]  A. Zwinderman,et al.  Detection of Vein Graft Disease Using High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Angiography , 2002, Circulation.

[24]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Accuracy of currently available techniques for prediction of functional recovery after revascularization in patients with left ventricular dysfunction due to chronic coronary artery disease: comparison of pooled data. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  W. Hundley,et al.  Visualization and functional assessment of proximal and middle left anterior descending coronary stenoses in humans with magnetic resonance imaging. , 1999, Circulation.

[26]  M. Reiser,et al.  Patency of coronary bypass grafts: assessment with breath-hold contrast-enhanced MR angiography--value of a non-electrocardiographically triggered technique. , 1998, Radiology.

[27]  E J Topol,et al.  Aortocoronary saphenous vein graft disease: pathogenesis, predisposition, and prevention. , 1998, Circulation.

[28]  E. Prvulovich Resuscitation following arrhythmia in patients undergoing pharmacological/exercise stress for myocardial perfusion imaging. , 1996, Nuclear medicine communications.

[29]  H. Lamb,et al.  Improved MR flow mapping in coronary artery bypass grafts during adenosine-induced stress. , 2001, Radiology.

[30]  W. Hundley,et al.  Noninvasive determination of infarct artery patency by cine magnetic resonance angiography. , 1995, Circulation.

[31]  L. Axel,et al.  Noninvasive determination of coronary artery bypass graft patency by cine magnetic resonance imaging. , 1989, Circulation.

[32]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  P. V. van Ooijen,et al.  MR coronary angiography with breath-hold targeted volumes: preliminary clinical results. , 2000, Radiology.

[34]  O. Simonetti,et al.  Contrast-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography for evaluating patency of coronary artery bypass grafts. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[35]  R. Helfant,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate patency of aortocoronary bypass grafts. , 1987, Circulation.

[36]  P. V. van Ooijen,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the coronary arteries: clinical results from three dimensional evaluation of a respiratory gated technique , 1999, Heart.

[37]  R. Krone,et al.  Cardiac catheterization 1991: a report of the Registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions (SCA&I). , 1993, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[38]  R. J. van der Geest,et al.  Noninvasive evaluation of aortocoronary bypass grafts with magnetic resonance flow mapping. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.