The bionic blues: Robot rejection lowers self-esteem

Humans can fulfill their social needs with fictional and non-living entities that act as social surrogates. Though recent research demonstrates that social surrogates have beneficial effects on the individual similar to human relations, it is unclear whether surrogates can also cause similar harm to humans through social rejection. After playing a game of connect-4 with a human-sized robot, participants were informed by the robot that it would like to see them again (acceptance), would not like to see them again (rejection), or told nothing regarding a future interaction (control). Data revealed that social rejection from a robot significantly reduced self-esteem relative to receiving no-feedback and social acceptance (the latter two did not differ from each other). However, robot rejection had no impact on negative attitudes and opposition to the use of robots in everyday life. These findings demonstrate that social surrogates have the potential to cause psychological harm. Examines influence of robot rejection and acceptance on human self-esteem.Robot rejection decreased self-esteem, while acceptance had no effect on self-esteem.Demonstrates that robot rejection can cause psychological harm.

[1]  J. Crocker,et al.  From Vulnerability to Resilience , 2004, Psychological science.

[2]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  The interactive effects of robot anthropomorphism and robot ability on perceived threat and support for robotics research , 2016 .

[3]  B. Pelham,et al.  Fluctuations in state implicit self-esteem in response to daily negative events☆ , 2007 .

[4]  K. Crawford.  Artificial Intelligence's White Guy Problem , 2016 .

[5]  F. Eyssel,et al.  Wanna play? The role of self-construal when using gadgets to cope with ostracism , 2015 .

[6]  Miles Hewstone,et al.  Subtyping and Subgrouping: Processes for the Prevention and Promotion of Stereotype Change , 2001 .

[7]  K. Murphy,et al.  Statistical Power Analysis: A Simple and General Model for Traditional and Modern Hypothesis Tests, Second Ediction , 1998 .

[8]  T. Pettigrew.  Intergroup contact theory. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[9]  Rick Richardson,et al.  How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer is sufficient to lower self-reported levels of belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existence , 2004 .

[10]  Richard N. Landers,et al.  An Inconvenient Truth: Arbitrary Distinctions Between Organizational, Mechanical Turk, and Other Convenience Samples , 2015, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[11]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  Life after P-Hacking , 2013 .

[12]  Roy F. Baumeister,et al.  If You Can't Join Them, Beat Them: Effects of Social Exclusion on Aggressive Behavior , 2001 .

[13]  Brian C. Nelson,et al.  Rejection Elicits Emotional Reactions but Neither Causes Immediate Distress nor Lowers Self-Esteem: A Meta-Analytic Review of 192 Studies on Social Exclusion , 2009, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[14]  M. Leary,et al.  Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. , 1995 .

[15]  Robin M. Kowalski,et al.  Teasing, rejection, and violence: Case studies of the school shootings. , 2003 .

[16]  T. Kanda,et al.  Measurement of negative attitudes toward robots , 2006 .

[17]  Kipling D. Williams,et al.  Ostracism: The Kiss of Social Death , 2007 .

[18]  C. Nathan DeWall,et al.  It's the thought that counts: The role of hostile cognition in shaping aggressive responses to social exclusion. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Steven J. Sherman,et al.  Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. , 2000 .

[20]  Roy F. Baumeister,et al.  Thwarting the Need to Belong: Understanding the Interpersonal and Inner Effects of Social Exclusion , 2007 .

[21]  Thomas F. Pettigrew,et al.  Recent advances in intergroup contact theory , 2011 .

[22]  C. Nathan DeWall,et al.  Alone but feeling no pain: Effects of social exclusion on physical pain tolerance and pain threshold, affective forecasting, and interpersonal empathy. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  D. Campbell.  Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities , 2007 .

[24]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Computers are social actors , 1994, CHI '94.

[26]  D. Horton,et al.  Mass communication and para-social interaction; observations on intimacy at a distance. , 1956, Psychiatry.

[27]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Can we control it? Autonomous robots threaten human identity, uniqueness, safety, and resources , 2017, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[28]  Jelte M. Wicherts,et al.  The Ordinal Effects of Ostracism: A Meta-Analysis of 120 Cyberball Studies , 2015, PloS one.

[29]  A. Rubin,et al.  LONELINESS, PARASOCIAL INTERACTION, AND LOCAL TELEVISION NEWS VIEWING , 1985 .

[30]  Jonathan Cohen,et al.  Parasocial Break-Up from Favorite Television Characters: The Role of Attachment Styles and Relationship Intensity , 2004 .

[31]  L. Wheeler,et al.  On Being Rejected: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Research on Rejection , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[32]  Jaye L. Derrick,et al.  Social surrogacy: How favored television programs provide the experience of belonging , 2009 .

[33]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  Does Rejection Hurt? An fMRI Study of Social Exclusion , 2003, Science.

[34]  K. Dautenhahn,et al.  The Negative Attitudes Towards Robots Scale and reactions to robot behaviour in a live Human-Robot Interaction study , 2009 .

[35]  M. Rosenberg.  Conceiving the self , 1979 .

[36]  M. Hewstone,et al.  Changing people’s views of outgroups through individual-to-group generalisation: meta-analytic reviews and theoretical considerations , 2016 .