Quantification of coronary artery calcium with multi-detector row CT: assessing interscan variability with different tube currents pilot study.

PURPOSE To assess the interscan variability of coronary artery calcium as measured with different tube currents and quantification methods in prospective electrocardiography (ECG)-gated multi-detector row CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-three subjects who were asymptomatic for coronary heart disease underwent prospective ECG-gated, subsecond multi-detector row CT of the heart. Each subject underwent two consecutive CT examinations, the first with a dose of either 40 mAs (n = 18) or 80 mAs (n = 15) and the second with a dose of 150 mAs. Calcium volume and calcium score were calculated. Pearson correlation coefficient was computed between the calcium scores of high- and low-dose examinations. Interscan variability in these measurements (ie, the absolute percentage difference) was compared between the examinations with 40-150 mAs and those with 80-150 mAs by using an independent sample t test. In addition, the interscan variabilities of calcium scores between vessels were evaluated with repeated measures of analysis of variance. The interscan variabilities between calcium score and volume measurement were also compared with paired t tests. RESULTS Twenty-seven of 33 subjects had coronary artery calcium deposits on both CT scans. Five subjects had no calcium deposit on either scan. One subject had calcium deposits on only one scan. The total calcium score between the high- and low-dose scans was highly correlated (r = 0.98) and was not significantly different (P =.58). The interscan variability of calcium score showed no significant difference with respect to subject (P =.25) or vessel (P =.84). The interscan variability of the calcium volume measurement was significantly lower than that of the calcium score with respect to both the subject (P <.01) and the vessel (P <.01). CONCLUSION A dose of 40 mAs appears adequate for quantifying coronary artery calcium at multi-detector row CT. Interscan variability of multi-detector row CT is substantially reduced by using the calcium volume method.

[1]  R. Detrano,et al.  Detection of coronary calcification with electron-beam computed tomography: evaluation of interexamination reproducibility and comparison of three image-acquisition protocols. , 1996, American heart journal.

[2]  Shusuke Sone,et al.  Optimal tube current for lung cancer screening with low-dose spiral CT , 2000 .

[3]  M. Budoff,et al.  Prognostic value of coronary calcification and angiographic stenoses in patients undergoing coronary angiography. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  C A Kelsey,et al.  CT scanning: patterns of use and dose , 2000, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[5]  J. Gardin,et al.  Coronary artery calcium evaluation by electron beam computed tomography and its relation to new cardiovascular events. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  M. Reiser,et al.  Helical and single-slice conventional CT versus electron beam CT for the quantification of coronary artery calcification. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  J G Goldin,et al.  Coronary artery calcium: alternate methods for accurate and reproducible quantitation. , 1997, Academic radiology.

[8]  L. Bielak,et al.  Progression of coronary artery calcification: a pilot study. , 1999, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[9]  T. Callister,et al.  Identification of patients at increased risk of first unheralded acute myocardial infarction by electron-beam computed tomography. , 2000, Circulation.

[10]  M. Budoff,et al.  Electron beam computed tomography: Screening for coronary artery disease , 1999, Clinical cardiology.

[11]  Y. Arad,et al.  Predictive value of electron beam computed tomography of the coronary arteries. 19-month follow-up of 1173 asymptomatic subjects. , 1996, Circulation.

[12]  K. Bailey,et al.  Independent and incremental value of coronary artery calcium for predicting the extent of angiographic coronary artery disease: comparison with cardiac risk factors and radionuclide perfusion imaging. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  R. Detrano,et al.  Prognostic value of coronary electron-beam computed tomography for coronary heart disease events in asymptomatic populations. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.

[14]  J. Rumberger,et al.  Coronary artery calcium area by electron-beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque area. A histopathologic correlative study. , 1995, Circulation.

[15]  D J Conces,et al.  Measurement of coronary artery calcium with dual-slice helical CT compared with coronary angiography: evaluation of CT scoring methods, interobserver variations, and reproducibility. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  Y. Arad,et al.  Comparison of electron beam computed tomography scanning and conventional risk factor assessment for the prediction of angiographic coronary artery disease. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  D. Aberle,et al.  Spiral versus electron-beam CT for coronary artery calcium scoring. , 2001, Radiology.

[18]  J. Rumberger,et al.  Electron beam computed tomographic coronary calcium score cutpoints and severity of associated angiographic lumen stenosis. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  R. Detrano,et al.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  C H McCollough,et al.  Small lesions in the heart identified at electron beam CT: calcification or noise? , 1994, Radiology.

[21]  D. Rader,et al.  Electron beam computed tomographic coronary calcium scanning: a review and guidelines for use in asymptomatic persons. , 1999, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[22]  T. Callister,et al.  Coronary artery disease: improved reproducibility of calcium scoring with an electron-beam CT volumetric method. , 1998, Radiology.

[23]  S. Rich,et al.  Reproducibility of the measurement of coronary calcium with ultrafast computed tomography. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.

[24]  M. P. Hayball,et al.  Impact of motion artefact on the measurement of coronary calcium score. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[25]  C. Mielke,et al.  Reliability of electron beam computed tomography to detect coronary artery calcification. , 1995, American journal of cardiac imaging.

[26]  Y Itzchak,et al.  Calcification of coronary arteries: detection and quantification with double-helix CT. , 1995, Radiology.

[27]  J. Rumberger,et al.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium by electron beam computed tomography for determination of severity of angiographic coronary artery disease in younger patients. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  M. Budoff,et al.  Relation of coronary calcium score by electron beam computed tomography to arteriographic findings in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.

[29]  M. Reiser,et al.  Cardiac imaging by means of electrocardiographically gated multisection spiral CT: initial experience. , 2000, Radiology.

[30]  P. Sheedy,et al.  Detection of heart calcification with electron beam CT: interobserver and intraobserver reliability for scoring quantification. , 1994, Radiology.

[31]  J G Goldin,et al.  Interscan variation in coronary artery calcium quantification in a large asymptomatic patient population. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[32]  M. Budoff,et al.  Exercise testing and electron beam computed tomography in the evaluation of coronary artery disease. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.