Technology and accessibility in global governance and human rights: the experience of disability rights advocates

International organizations are working on an unprecedented number of development initiatives relevant to people with disabilities. This makes it essential for the global disability community to be able to participate effectively in the decision-making processes associated with these programs. In light of this, this study aims to explore whether information technologies can help create a more inclusive global governance, forming the basis for equitable development for people with disabilities.,The results of a global survey of disabled people’s organizations’ (DPOs) leaders are discussed. This asked disability rights advocates about their experiences with accessibility and barriers to effective participation, low-cost accessible technological solutions for remote participation and freely available “off-the-shelf” online technologies – in particular social media platforms – to bridge the gap between the disability community and global governance processes.,Although only a small number of international conferences offer accessible virtual participation through web conferencing and other tools, responses from DPO advocates suggest that there is a strong demand for this technology and provide evidence of its potential for improving accessibility in global governance. Furthermore, disability organizations all over the world have embraced social media platforms to liaise with their grassroots and enable them to part-take in policy-making processes.,This study highlights community-backed technological solutions to persisting barriers that systematically exclude people with disabilities from fundamental global governance processes, illuminating the nexus of disability, accessibility, and participation.

[1]  Sajda Qureshi,et al.  Are we making a Better World with Information and Communication Technology for Development (ICT4D) Research? Findings from the Field and Theory Building , 2015, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[2]  F. Trevisan Connective action mechanisms in a time of political turmoil: virtual disability rights protest at Donald Trump’s inauguration , 2018 .

[3]  J. Lord,et al.  Lessons from the Experience of U.N. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Addressing the Democratic Deficit in Global Health Governance , 2010, The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[4]  Øystein Sæbø,et al.  A holistic perspective on the theoretical foundations for ICT4D research , 2018, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[5]  Sajda Qureshi,et al.  Creating a Better World with Information and Communication Technologies: Health Equity , 2016, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[6]  Sajda Qureshi,et al.  Discovering development from information technologies: does open access to technology improve the lives of people? , 2012, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[7]  Todd G. Shields,et al.  Generational Cohorts, Group Membership, and Political Participation by People with Disabilities , 2005 .

[8]  Nimmi Rangaswamy,et al.  Social Media for Development: Outlining Debates, Theory and Praxis , 2016, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[9]  F. Trevisan Crowd-sourced advocacy: Promoting disability rights through online storytelling , 2017 .

[10]  Kathleen Diga,et al.  The ICT Ecosystem: The Application, Usefulness, and Future of an Evolving Concept , 2016, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[11]  Reima Suomi,et al.  Digital disability divide in information society: A framework based on a structured literature review , 2015, J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc..

[12]  James Skouge,et al.  Navigating the currents of change: technology, inclusion, and access for people with disabilities in the Pacific , 2012, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[13]  Yingqin Zheng,et al.  Conceptualizing development in information and communication technology for development (ICT4D) , 2018, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[14]  Jack Yan Social media in branding: Fulfilling a need , 2011 .

[15]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Unrealized potential: Exploring the digital disability divide , 2016 .