A Bedside Decision Instrument To Elicit a Patient's Preference Concerning Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer

The objective of this study was to develop an instrument to help clinicians inform patients with breast cancer of risks and benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy as derived from clinical trials and to help the informed patient decide whether she prefers treatment or no treatment. The instrument consists of a visual aid (called the decision board) and written material. It provides detailed information on a patient's choices (chemotherapy or no chemotherapy), outcomes (recurrence or not), probabilities of outcomes and their meaning, and quality of life associated with treatment choice and outcome. The validity and reliability of the instrument were evaluated in 30 healthy female volunteers. It was first administered using standard estimates of recurrence for node-negative breast cancer (15% risk of recurrence without treatment, which is reduced to 10% with chemotherapy). A preference for treatment (or no treatment) was then elicited. The validity was evaluated by changing the information provided on risks and benefits and determining whether the preference changed in a predictable manner. To test for reliability, the instrument was administered 2 weeks later. Seventeen women chose chemotherapy and 13 chose no chemotherapy. In the former group, 14 women (82%) switched preference when the magnitude of benefit was reduced, and 16 (94%) switched when the toxicity of treatment was increased. For those women who chose not to receive chemotherapy, 12 (92%) switched when the benefit was increased and 100% switched when toxicity was eliminated. The reliability was excellent (kappa = 0.86). The instrument has been used to elicit treatment preferences in 37 newly presenting patients with high-risk, node-negative breast cancer and has been found to be acceptable and helpful to the patient.

[1]  A. Mehrez,et al.  The Healthy-years Equivalents , 1991, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[2]  T E Hughes,et al.  Patient involvement in health care. A procedural justice viewpoint. , 1991, Medical care.

[3]  M. Gent,et al.  When is a prognostic factor useful? A guide for the perplexed. , 1991, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  B E Hillner,et al.  Efficacy and cost effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with node-negative breast cancer. A decision-analysis model. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  V. Shih,et al.  Aminoaciduria due to vinyl-GABA administration. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  G. Rose Reflections on the changing times. , 1990, BMJ.

[7]  David V. Budescu,et al.  Dyadic decisions with numerical and verbal probabilities , 1990 .

[8]  G M Clark,et al.  How to use prognostic factors in axillary node-negative breast cancer patients. , 1990, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  S. Wartman,et al.  When competent patients make irrational choices. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  A Gafni,et al.  Evaluating health related quality of life: an indifference curve interpretation for the time trade-off technique. , 1990, Social science & medicine.

[11]  L. Siminoff,et al.  Effects of outcome framing on treatment decisions in the real world: impact of framing on adjuvant breast cancer decisions. , 1989, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[12]  L. Siminoff,et al.  Doctor-patient communication about breast cancer adjuvant therapy. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  C K Osborne,et al.  Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk node-negative breast cancer. An intergroup study. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  C. Redmond,et al.  A randomized clinical trial evaluating sequential methotrexate and fluorouracil in the treatment of patients with node-negative breast cancer who have estrogen-receptor-negative tumors. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  W. McGuire Adjuvant therapy for node-negative breast cancer. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  G. Loomes,et al.  The use of QALYs in health care decision making. , 1989, Social science & medicine.

[17]  M. Zelen,et al.  Prolonged disease-free survival after one course of perioperative adjuvant chemotherapy for node-negative breast cancer. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Quality of life in stage II breast cancer: an instrument for clinical trials. , 1988, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  W. Mackillop,et al.  Cancer patients' perceptions of their disease and its treatment. , 1988, British Journal of Cancer.

[20]  I. Henderson,et al.  Adjuvant systemic therapy for early breast cancer. , 1987, Current problems in cancer.

[21]  N F Boyd,et al.  Eliciting preferences for alternative drug therapies in oncology: influence of treatment outcome description, elicitation technique and treatment experience on preferences. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[22]  G. Bonadonna,et al.  Adjuvant systemic therapy for resectable breast cancer. , 1985, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  B. Cassileth,et al.  Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. , 1980, Annals of internal medicine.