Acceptable daily intake: inception, evolution, and application.

The acceptable daily intake (ADI) approach to toxicological evaluation was initiated by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives in 1961. The procedure involves collecting all relevant data, ascertaining the completeness of the available data, determining the no-effect level using the most sensitive indicator of the toxicity, and applying an appropriate safety factor to arrive at the ADI for man. This procedure was also adopted by the Joint FAO/WHO Meeting of Experts on Pesticide Residues later in 1961. In the ensuing years, hundreds of food additives and pesticide residues have been evaluated and reevaluated by these two international expert groups. The ADIs, used nationally and internationally in the elaboration of food standards, have proved satisfactory in permitting the judicious use of these chemicals and in protecting the health of the consumer. The success of this endeavor over the years can be attributed to the dedication and hard work of the many international experts involved as well as to the cooperation of the chemical industry in submitting all relevant published and unpublished data. It is envisaged that this approach will continue to be followed in evaluating and reevaluating additives, pesticides, and contaminants, and that it will likely be extended to other situations where toxicological evaluation forms the scientific basis of control measures.

[1]  R. E. Duggan,et al.  Pesticide Residues in Food , 1973 .

[2]  P. Bidstrup Principles Governing Consumer Safety in Relation to Pesticide Residues , 1963 .

[3]  P. Grasso Principles for the Testing and Evaluation of Drugs for Carcinogenicity , 1970 .

[4]  The no-effect level, an old bone of contention in toxicology , 1979, Archives of Toxicology.

[5]  O. G. Fitzhugh,et al.  100-Fold margin of safety , 1954 .

[6]  M L Dourson,et al.  Regulatory history and experimental support of uncertainty (safety) factors. , 1983, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[7]  I C Munro,et al.  Risk assessment and regulatory decision making. , 1981, Food and cosmetics toxicology.

[8]  F. Lu,et al.  Safety assessments of chemicals with thresholded effects. , 1985, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[9]  D G Hoel,et al.  Estimation of risks of irreversible, delayed toxicity. , 1975, Journal of toxicology and environmental health.

[10]  F C Lu Toxicological evaluations of carcinogens and noncarcinogens: pros and cons of different approaches. , 1983, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[11]  M. Johnson Delayed neurotoxic action of some organophosphorus compounds. , 1969, British medical bulletin.

[12]  F. Coulston Reconsideration of the dilemma of DDT for the establishment of an acceptable daily intake. , 1985, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[13]  M. B. Abou-Donia,et al.  Delayed neurotoxicity from continous low-dose oral administration of leptophos to hens. , 1976, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[14]  E. Anderson,et al.  New Risk Assessment Initiatives in Epa , 1985, Toxicology and industrial health.

[15]  O. Fitzhugh,et al.  Marked potentiation in mammalian toxicity from simultaneous administration of two anticholinesterase compounds. , 1957, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.