Metamodels are used to provide simpler prediction means than the complex simulation models they approximate. Accuracy of a metamodel is one fundamental criterion that is used as the basis for accepting or rejecting a metamodel. Average-based metrics such as root-mean-square error RMSE and R-square are often used. Like all other average-based statistics, these measures are sensitive to sample sizes unless the number of test points in these samples is adequate. A new metric that can be used to measure metamodels fit quality, called metamodel acceptability score MAS, is introduced. The proposed metric gives readily interpretable meaning to metamodels acceptability. Furthermore, initial studies show that MAS is less sensitive to test sample sizes compared to average-based validation measures
[1]
Osman Balci,et al.
How To Assess The Acceptability And Credibility Of Simulation Results
,
1989,
1989 Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings.
[2]
Robert G. Sargent,et al.
Validation and verification of simulation models
,
1999,
Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference, 2004..
[3]
Husam Hamad,et al.
Two new subjective validation methods using data displays
,
2005,
Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, 2005..
[4]
Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.
Validation of regression metamodels in simulation: Bootstrap approach
,
2006,
Eur. J. Oper. Res..