PRIORITIZING THE MANY MEASURES OF SUCCESS IN OUTSOURCED DESIGN

Companies that develop new products increasingly outsource design, a trend that has prompted much concern but little prescription on how best to manage such projects. One challenge is the lack of understanding of what constitutes success in outsourced design. To provide clarity, this paper identifies academic and practical perspectives on success from the literature as well as our own interviews with design consultants and consulting clients, organizes the perspectives into a typology featuring seven distinct dimensions of success, and then prioritizes the key success measures using a survey of 194 additional practitioners. The results suggest that past research has generally focused on the wrong success measures, overstating the impact of problems during development and the relative importance of return on investment, and omitting key measures such as working relationship quality, project value, and client satisfaction. Not all success measures are well correlated; a project may do very well on some but poorly on others. While each measure has it merits, client satisfaction appears to be a promising summary measure.Copyright © 2013 by ASME

[1]  Stephen Potter,et al.  Managing design projects in small and medium-sized firms , 1990 .

[2]  R. Roy,et al.  The commercial impacts of investment in design , 1993 .

[3]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[4]  Edward G. Anderson,et al.  Managing Outsourced Product Design: The Effectiveness of Alternative Integration Mechanisms , 2007 .

[5]  C. Fornell,et al.  The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, Purpose, and Findings , 1996 .

[6]  A. Griffin PDMA Research on New Product Development Practices: Updating Trends and Benchmarking Best Practices , 1997 .

[7]  R. Cooper,et al.  New Products: What Separates Winners from Losers? , 1987 .

[8]  Sam Kurokawa,et al.  Technology Outsourcing in the U.S. and Japan , 2002 .

[9]  Daniel E. Whitney,et al.  EXPLORING THE MEANING OF SUCCESS IN OUTSOURCED PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 2010 .

[10]  Stephen Potter,et al.  The risks and rewards of design investment , 1995 .

[11]  E. Hultink,et al.  Measuring new product success: The difference that time perspective makes , 1995 .

[12]  Stephen J. Carson When to Give up Control of Outsourced New Product Development , 2007 .

[13]  Charles H. Fine,et al.  The International Center for Research on the Management of Technology Is the Make-buy Decision Process a Core Competence? , 2022 .

[14]  Daniel E. Whitney,et al.  The effectiveness of design and innovation consulting , 2012 .

[15]  Arnold J. Rothstein,et al.  Outsourcing: An Accelerating Global Trend in Engineering , 1998 .

[16]  S. Hart,et al.  Dimensions of success in new product development: An exploratory investigation , 1993 .

[17]  N. Kano,et al.  Attractive Quality and Must-Be Quality , 1984 .

[18]  A. Griffin,et al.  An Interim Report on Measuring Product Development Success and Failure , 1993 .

[19]  Youjae Yi A Critical review of consumer satisfaction , 1989 .

[20]  A. Griffin,et al.  PDMA Success Measurement Project: Recommended Measures for Product Development Success and Failure , 1996 .

[21]  William J. Palm Understanding success and failure in outsourced product development , 2011 .

[22]  Peter L. Grant,et al.  Outsourced knowledge: knowledge transfer and strategic implications from design outsourcing , 2000 .

[23]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  The Effects of Outsourcing, Offshoring, and Distributed Product Development Organization on Coordinating the NPD Process , 2007 .

[24]  Kenneth B. Kahn,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: Trends and Drivers of Success in NPD Practices: Results of the 2003 PDMA Best Practices Study* , 2009 .